Ethan in Cleveland Posted March 5 Posted March 5 (edited) 5 hours ago, GunnerBill said: I am not sure he is a very good Quarterback. He was the worst starter in football in 2022. He was slightly better in 2023 but still bottom 3rd. But you are right about the locker room stuff. Some of what I have heard about Seattle was truly unbelievable. And you just have to hear how the guys off that team talk about him. Normally players will go to bat for a QB who helped them get a ring, however, with that squad their defense of Russ is always flimsy and conditional. Which makes the think I should believe the unbelievable. Ranked 21 in QBR and 20th by NFL.com. Threw 10 less INTs than Allen in only 2 less games, while throwing only 3 less TD passes. His YPA is terrible though. Suggesting he is more dink and dunk than he was earlier in his career when he had one of the best long balls in the game. He played his worst football early and got better as the season wore on. He was benched for financial reasons not for performance. Oh yeah and he was more than good enough to beat McD's defense.... But all in all I think you are correct, he is probably at the very top of the bottom 3rd. Still think he is an ugrade for a large number of teams Edited March 5 by Ethan in Cleveland 1 Quote
NoHuddleKelly12 Posted March 5 Posted March 5 Sad—any of yinz, nay, even I, could’ve taken a fraction of the $$ from Denver and delivered blazingly similar results! 🤧 https://youtu.be/RJZvL4sWVZE?feature=shared Quote
Jauronimo Posted March 5 Posted March 5 5 hours ago, GunnerBill said: I am not sure he is a very good Quarterback. He was the worst starter in football in 2022. He was slightly better in 2023 but still bottom 3rd. But you are right about the locker room stuff. Some of what I have heard about Seattle was truly unbelievable. And you just have to hear how the guys off that team talk about him. Normally players will go to bat for a QB who helped them get a ring, however, with that squad their defense of Russ is always flimsy and conditional. Which makes the think I should believe the unbelievable. Please share. 1 Quote
Freddie's Dead Posted March 5 Posted March 5 8 hours ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said: More time to practice his catchphrase! Way to sneak in the Nyheim Hines reference..... 2 Quote
GunnerBill Posted March 5 Posted March 5 2 hours ago, Ethan in Cleveland said: Ranked 21 in QBR and 20th by NFL.com. Threw 10 less INTs than Allen in only 2 less games, while throwing only 3 less TD passes. His YPA is terrible though. Suggesting he is more dink and dunk than he was earlier in his career when he had one of the best long balls in the game. He played his worst football early and got better as the season wore on. He was benched for financial reasons not for performance. Oh yeah and he was more than good enough to beat McD's defense.... But all in all I think you are correct, he is probably at the very top of the bottom 3rd. Still think he is an ugrade for a large number of teams The numbers were fools gold. The tape looked very different. Quote
stuvian Posted March 5 Posted March 5 note to self...bet against Denver in your survivor pool this season 1 Quote
Utah John Posted March 5 Posted March 5 11 hours ago, RyanC883 said: interesting. 1. wonder who picks him up. 2. wonder what Denver's thinking for its QB situation. Denver is crashing. They gave up a ton for Wilson and can't return to success for a year or two. I think the reason for the release is that Wilson was still good enough for them to steal a couple of wins, and ruin their draft position in the years ahead. 1 Quote
davefan66 Posted March 5 Posted March 5 What an incredibly terrible trade and lost draft picks. Add the money/cap hit that will paralyze the team for the next two seasons. And people complain about Beane? 😆 1 Quote
Doc Brown Posted March 5 Posted March 5 Jets need a backup for Rodgers. Now that would be the ultimate reality TV. Quote
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted March 5 Posted March 5 So, the next time everyone here is talking about how Von is a bad contract I suspect he'll get a stop somewhere. There are places that are just as QB hungry as Denver, just that the amount of money he was getting was absurd in comparison to level of play. Washington, Pitt, Tenn, NE, Atlanta, Minnesota, LV, and even Seattle all need a QB and the back half of that list is way outside of the pick zone of the top candidates. Someone will take a sniff. Quote
NoSaint Posted March 5 Posted March 5 6 hours ago, Ethan in Cleveland said: Ranked 21 in QBR and 20th by NFL.com. Threw 10 less INTs than Allen in only 2 less games, while throwing only 3 less TD passes. His YPA is terrible though. Suggesting he is more dink and dunk than he was earlier in his career when he had one of the best long balls in the game. He played his worst football early and got better as the season wore on. He was benched for financial reasons not for performance. Oh yeah and he was more than good enough to beat McD's defense.... But all in all I think you are correct, he is probably at the very top of the bottom 3rd. Still think he is an ugrade for a large number of teams If he was performing, his finances wouldn’t be an issue Quote
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted March 5 Posted March 5 9 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Cortland Sutton come on down!!!! Trade for him then draft Worthy. I mean...yes, but not for the money that he's due. If the Broncos are in full fire sale mode and are willing to trade him for peanuts and Beane uses salary conversion and void years it's possible but at this point if they are in a fire sale mode they might just cut him. Quote
BuffaloBillyG Posted March 5 Posted March 5 11 hours ago, Steptide said: I thought this as well. They have a ton of cap space and can afford to over pay him, at least a little, not give him what Denver gave him. He could be a good bridge qb for them Because of the offset language in his Bronco contact, it's highly likely that whoever signs him will get him at league minimum for a veteran. No one will have to overpay him. Anything signed above minimum just makes it so the Broncos pay less. Giants are a team I'd keep an eye on. Quote
BarleyNY Posted March 5 Posted March 5 11 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said: Looking around the league, it is REALLY hard to find a team that makes a lot of sense from the stand point of being an NFL starter. From a team need perspective, Steelers are the only one I can look at and Wilson likely makes that team better on the field, and that is more about how bad the Steeler QB's are than it is about how good Wilson is today. With the defense and run game, Wilson doesn't have to carry the offense kind of like the early days in Seattle when they went to back to back SB's winning one. However, from a culture stand point, Steelers feel like a bad fit and I have a hard time seeing Pittsburgh being interested. So I don't know where he goes and gets a chance to start other than to say keep the seat warm for a rookie. And you got to imagine teams are going to be concerned after the Broncos said they would rather have an $85M dead cap hit than see him QB another game for them. I mean, thats a pretty huge statement and from a team that has Sean Payton as an offensive HC. The other aspect is this: What if Wilson performs decently this season on his one year, $1.21M contract? I’m imagining a Daniel Jones kind of scenario where the team does well and wins a playoff game behind a QB that is just good enough. Then you have to have to pay him or go find another QB somewhere while the fans lose their minds. That would be a real possibility with the Steelers. Quote
Dan Darragh Posted March 5 Posted March 5 15 hours ago, Ethan in Cleveland said: He's still a very good QB. Is there any evidence to support this? Quote
ganesh Posted March 5 Posted March 5 16 hours ago, Steptide said: Isn't his cap hit like 30 million or something for like 3 years? Edit - 85 million dead cap hit 😳 and the multiple draft picks they lost Quote
fergie's ire Posted March 5 Posted March 5 15 hours ago, wppete said: Insane! Is that a record? I believe I heard that it's more than double the previous record. Quote
BBFL Posted March 5 Posted March 5 1 hour ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: So, the next time everyone here is talking about how Von is a bad contract I suspect he'll get a stop somewhere. There are places that are just as QB hungry as Denver, just that the amount of money he was getting was absurd in comparison to level of play. Washington, Pitt, Tenn, NE, Atlanta, Minnesota, LV, and even Seattle all need a QB and the back half of that list is way outside of the pick zone of the top candidates. Someone will take a sniff. The only thing bad about Von’s contract is he doesn’t play. Can’t fault Denver for the two years they over-compensated Seattle for Wilson. They had a decent core team to make an attempt at winning things… He at least was on the field for most of it irrespective of it worked out or not… They tried. Can’t do anything else but that. Quote
Sweats Posted March 5 Posted March 5 16 hours ago, wppete said: Possibly the worst trade of all time. The amount of money and assets traded for him was insane and he did absolutely nothing for denver. D. Watson was arguably the worst in NFL history, however, this RW one ranks right up there. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.