blacklabel Posted March 4 Posted March 4 That's a negative, Ghost Rider. That dude changes the whole defense. Offenses have to account for him. He's smart, fast, and always around the ball. He's a cornerstone player. Really wish he could've been back for the playoffs. He and Bernard make a really good pair. They might be a smidge undersized but they play big so that's all that matters. Quote
Buffalo Super Fan Posted March 4 Posted March 4 No I bring back Matt Milano because he has it. The ability to make plays something you can’t really coach you either got it or you don’t as a football player. Matt Milano injury was a great loss for the Buffalo Bills defense last year. Because Matt Milano is able to get through blocks to make plays on defense so yes I bring him back in my opinion. Go Bills! Let’s Go Buffalo Quote
mrags Posted March 4 Posted March 4 Just now, Matt_In_NH said: Bengals game/Damar Hamlin? THe Bills played 16. Well. We finished 16 games but started 17. Not sure how they are using that with the stat line. point is the guy is always hurt in some way. If he’s not missing games he’s limited. amen the bigger point which is what I said before, I’m fine with him on our team. But nobody is trading a significant pick for him. Between his age and injury history he’s not going anywhere 1 1 Quote
Matt_In_NH Posted March 4 Posted March 4 3 minutes ago, mrags said: Not sure how they are using that with the stat line. The game does not exist in the NFL records, they played 16 games, period. Quote
RyanC883 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 perhaps put him in bubble wrap the first 2/3rds of the season. Has he played in the playoffs the last 2 years healthy? I'm thinking no. So save him? Quote
mrags Posted March 4 Posted March 4 13 minutes ago, Matt_In_NH said: The game does not exist in the NFL records, they played 16 games, period. Still doesn’t take away from the fact that he’s never finished a full season in his career 1 1 Quote
Robert Paulson Posted March 4 Posted March 4 is it stupid season or what? i may have to go away and come back draft night if this is what people think is an intelligent thought. The last 5 out of 7 posts i've opened have been like this. arrrrgh Quote
Kirby Jackson Posted March 4 Posted March 4 Maybe the Bills should consider trading Josh Allen? I saw a guy suggest picks 1 & 9 from the Bears. They can “reset the clock.”curious to get your thoughts on this @All I Need is Hope 1 2 Quote
All I Need is Hope Posted March 4 Author Posted March 4 Appreciate you getting on just to be a smart a&@, Kirby. Right or wrong, my premise was that Beane knows each player’s value, which positions have a potential surplus, cap implications, etc. We have good, young linebackers on their rookie contracts. And holes elsewhere. It’s about managing scarce resources to field the best team. This was merely a “what if”. 1 Quote
machine gun kelly Posted March 4 Posted March 4 11 hours ago, All I Need is Hope said: With the emergence of Bernard, Dodson, Williams and Spector; and considering other holes to fill and limited cap space, does it make any sense to consider seeking a high pick for Milano? I love Milano’s playing style and impact, it’s just interesting to think about what he could fetch in a trade/shedding his cap hit, and using a high pick in a loaded draft. So you want to trade a 1st team all pro and just keep backups outside if Bernard? One that has a significant cap hit to us when we don’t have $. He’s basically the most talented player we have on defense and in his prime. 1 1 Quote
JoPoy88 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 (edited) 22 minutes ago, All I Need is Hope said: Appreciate you getting on just to be a smart a&@, Kirby. Right or wrong, my premise was that Beane knows each player’s value, which positions have a potential surplus, cap implications, etc. We have good, young linebackers on their rookie contracts. And holes elsewhere. It’s about managing scarce resources to field the best team. This was merely a “what if”. Bernard is the only one that has proven anything at all. Who are the others? Dorian? Hasn’t proven anything. Spector? Might be okay. Dodson’s a FA. You talk about holes and yet want to create another gaping one and fill it with 2 guys with 52 total tackles in the NFL between the two of them. That’s it. So “good young LBs (plural)” is just completely false. Edited March 4 by JoPoy88 Quote
SCBills Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 hour ago, Kirby Jackson said: What happened to this place? I know you’re asking rhetorically, but the honest answer is a lot of us have given up on “running it back” and want to see some real change this off-season. Of course a lot of the suggestions are financially difficult given Beane (probably) purposefully locking this group into this current window. Let’s hope we stay healthy and see what they can truly do next year. Quote
Kirby Jackson Posted March 4 Posted March 4 45 minutes ago, All I Need is Hope said: Appreciate you getting on just to be a smart a&@, Kirby. Right or wrong, my premise was that Beane knows each player’s value, which positions have a potential surplus, cap implications, etc. We have good, young linebackers on their rookie contracts. And holes elsewhere. It’s about managing scarce resources to field the best team. This was merely a “what if”. It is an awful idea and warranted the response. It’s not as bad as when people (or person) wanted to trade Mario Williams for John Skelton but it’s up there. The Bills need MORE stars, not less. Milano is probably their 2nd best player. They don’t get better subtracting him!! 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️ The Bills are FINE in terms of cap space. If you don’t believe me, I suggest that you watch Greg Tompsett’s take on the cap this offseason. The Bills will be able to add a couple of decent players (maybe Chinn/Dugger & Curtis Samuel) while bringing back Daquan Jones. They may even be able to fit Epenesa or Dane in there. I expect Lawson back as well. In the draft, you’re adding a WR early and probably another (potentially early). You’re adding a S early (if you don’t sign one in FA). You’re using the rest of your picks to fill out the DL and depth. The Bills will absolutely be a better team, on paper, in 2024 than they were in 2023. 18 minutes ago, SCBills said: I know you’re asking rhetorically, but the honest answer is a lot of us have given up on “running it back” and want to see some real change this off-season. Of course a lot of the suggestions are financially difficult given Beane (probably) purposefully locking this group into this current window. Let’s hope we stay healthy and see what they can truly do next year. See above No one is talking about running it back. We are talking about improving the weapons for Josh (duh) and getting younger and cheaper on the DL. The only “hard” decision that the Bills really have is bringing Von back. You hope he rebounds some and can clear that next year. They are fine. The sky is not falling (at all). 1 Quote
SCBills Posted March 4 Posted March 4 (edited) 32 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: It is an awful idea and warranted the response. It’s not as bad as when people (or person) wanted to trade Mario Williams for John Skelton but it’s up there. The Bills need MORE stars, not less. Milano is probably their 2nd best player. They don’t get better subtracting him!! 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️ The Bills are FINE in terms of cap space. If you don’t believe me, I suggest that you watch Greg Tompsett’s take on the cap this offseason. The Bills will be able to add a couple of decent players (maybe Chinn/Dugger & Curtis Samuel) while bringing back Daquan Jones. They may even be able to fit Epenesa or Dane in there. I expect Lawson back as well. In the draft, you’re adding a WR early and probably another (potentially early). You’re adding a S early (if you don’t sign one in FA). You’re using the rest of your picks to fill out the DL and depth. The Bills will absolutely be a better team, on paper, in 2024 than they were in 2023. See above No one is talking about running it back. We are talking about improving the weapons for Josh (duh) and getting younger and cheaper on the DL. The only “hard” decision that the Bills really have is bringing Von back. You hope he rebounds some and can clear that next year. They are fine. The sky is not falling (at all). I don’t think that’s the only hard decision though. I think a real case could be made to flip over the secondary. Any or all of Douglas, Tre and Poyer should be looked at. That could free up 20M+ and then we pull a Chiefs of a few years ago and draft a bunch of DB’s. Are their risks to that.. YUP. But I think with all that’s coming back on offense, it’s time to give Josh Allen everything he could possibly need to get us over the edge. Could flip that money into a legit boundary WR and then draft a WR early. Spend the rest on DL, make a run at Jeremy Chinn and then go heavy defense in the draft. I’ll take my chances with Benford, Elam, Johnson, Chinn and a RD2 or RD3 Safety like Kinchens, Bullard, Nubin etc. Draft some corners and a safety early Day 3 & bring back Dane Jackson/Cam Lewis/Taylor Rapp as depth. Now, we’re building a roster than can keep up with the Chiefs who have already fixed their cap and I don’t know that we’re any worse for the wear… especially come playoff time - where this group has yet to step up. Edited March 4 by SCBills Quote
Low Positive Posted March 5 Posted March 5 If NFL contracts were like NHL or NBA contracts, sure. Unload the player to get some picks to fill bigger needs. But they’re not. In terms of cap space, Milano costs more if we trade him than if he plays here. Quote
Trev Posted March 5 Posted March 5 How many full years has milano played? Guy may be injury proned. Is it worth it to find out? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.