Westside Posted March 1 Posted March 1 24 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: No doubt Hunter is a sleazeball, whether high or sober. But I read the article (poorly written as it is), and I glean that: - Joe Biden was actually NOT present at the time the relevant phone call was made. The article says that photo evidence shows Joe was elsewhere. - The article fails to mention the date the phone call occurred. That's kind of important, isn't it? If it's when Joe was VP, well, then, this is even sleazier (but not illegal). If it happened while Trump was President, well, then it's just ordinarily sleazy, in the manner of Kushner's Saudi deal. This is why the Smirnov testimony was critical to the entire case. And that has gone bye-bye. I was in favor of a Congressional investigation here, since that CI report directly implicated Joe. Now there is no basis for this to continue. It's become a farce, more about keeping the "The President's son is a sleazeball" in the public eye than actually finding something even close to an impeachable offense. Spin, deflect, wash and rinse. Repeat process. 1 2
The Frankish Reich Posted March 1 Posted March 1 28 minutes ago, Westside said: Spin, deflect, wash and rinse. Repeat process. I just told you. I was FOR the Congressional investigation before I was against it. When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do? 1
The Frankish Reich Posted March 1 Posted March 1 14 hours ago, daz28 said: If these clowns are so about looking into the appearance of impropriety, then why are the smoking guns of Jarred Kushner and Clarence Thomas not being looked at? Lawfare much? Does it matter? You still have to directly link Joe. Do you think every time a kid says my dad will beat you up, that it's proof that he actually had a talk with his dad about being his enforcer? A court would laugh at this. Well, not a Congressional court of GQP fools, but they know the 60% non-Maga group of Americans aren't that dumb. And they're all worked up about who was looped in on the August 2017 call. What was Joe Biden's official role in August 2017? Well, pretty much what Trump's role was on May 8, 2022, when Jared Kushner signed that $2 billion deal with the Saudi royal family: private citizen, not yet an announced candidate for President. The key here is, and always has been, whether Joe used his official position (VP) for profit or to further Hunter's "business." What evidence do they have for that? 1
B-Man Posted March 1 Posted March 1 THE ONLY THING HE’S EVER SHOWN ANY APTITUDE FOR IS PLAYING OFF HIS FAMOUS NAME: Hunter Biden’s Explanation for Threatening Text to Chinese Exec Is Beyond Stupid. https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/02/29/hunter-bidens-explanation-for-threatening-text-to-chinese-exec-is-beyond-stupid-n4926898 1
The Frankish Reich Posted March 1 Posted March 1 I read earlier in the thread that there is proof that Joe wasn't at his Delaware home on July 30, 2017. So unless that's wrong, it does seem that Hunter was lying to his Chinese contacts when he texted (from the Delaware home) that he has Joe right here with him.
BillsFanNC Posted March 1 Author Posted March 1 2 hours ago, Westside said: Spin, deflect, wash and rinse. Repeat process. Finding Qanon is quiet adept at this. 2
B-Man Posted March 2 Posted March 2 229-Page Hunter Biden Deposition Transcript Released https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Hunter-Biden-Transcript_Redacted.pdf 2
The Frankish Reich Posted March 2 Posted March 2 On 3/1/2024 at 7:51 AM, B-Man said: Hunter Biden admits to being 'high or drunk' when he said he was 'sitting here' with dad Joe just days before $5.1 million flowed into family accounts from Chinese energy company by Jon Michael Raasch * Hunter Biden said he was either drunk or on drugs when he pretended his father was sitting next to him in a successful bid to persuade a Chinese company to pay the family $5.1 million, he told Congress today. The president's son was giving closed door testimony to the Congressional impeachment inquiry into his father's business links today when he made the jaw-dropping admission. 'Hunter admitted that he was high or drunk when he sent the "sitting here with my father" WhatsApp message, sent it to the wrong recipient, and is now embarrassed by the message,' a readout of his testimony recorded. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13138891/Hunter-Biden-high-drunk-Chinese-energy-company.html . From the linked story: The WhatsApp message to CEFC was cited by IRS whistleblowers Joseph Ziegler and Gary Shapley last year as evidence of a Justice Department cover-up into the Biden's after they were refused permission to investigate it. It later emerged from photos on his abandoned laptop that Hunter Biden was not with his father on the day it was sent, but was at Joe Biden's home in Wilmington, Delaware. So ... Hunter WAS lying about Joe being present with him at the time he sent his shakedown text. And this happened in summer 2017, when Joe was a private citizen. So ... where's anything remotely impeachable? Private citizen Joe may have profited from a China deal. Whoop-de-doo. Where's the malfeasance when he was actually VP? That all depended on discredited witness Smirnov. This is now pure politics, not an actual impeachment inquiry. Kill it.
ChiGoose Posted May 31 Posted May 31 Hunter Biden’s trial still set to begin on Monday. So odd that Joe Biden, the manipulator of all courts in the country, who controls the levers of the justice system at all levels would allow this to happen… 1
Recommended Posts