BBFL Posted February 27 Posted February 27 (edited) If we didn’t have Knox, Jonnu would be an interesting acquisition. Think he’s a very talented #2 to have or a low-end #1. Let’s say Floyd and AJE are out the door and don’t come back, wonder if Barrett would take a little less to come play with Von? He always said when his move to Tampa paid off that he credits Miller with guiding him on how to be a successful and consummate professional as a teammate and player. 🤔 Edited February 27 by BBFL 2 Quote
ngbills Posted February 28 Posted February 28 Waiting for Harty and Hines to be added to this list 1 Quote
MrEpsYtown Posted February 28 Posted February 28 I think the released guy (no comp pick impact) who makes a ton of sense is Eddie Jackson. Playmaker who has had injury issues the last couple of years. he is a perfect fit as a FS in this defense. Chicago plays many similar coverage concepts. Honestly doesn't seem like he has lost a. step, it's more of an injury issue. The other guy who makes some level of sense is Lawrence Guy, a dude who hs some flexibility and would add a non-comp pick affecting body to the DL room. 3 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted February 28 Author Posted February 28 Just now, ngbills said: Waiting for Harty and Hines to be added to this list didn’t Beane already “promise” Hines he wouldn’t be cut? Harty had a HUGE PR that won us the division, but he was barely used as an actual WR. I thought he showed some flashes when he was 2 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said: I think the released guy (no comp pick impact) who makes a ton of sense is Eddie Jackson. Playmaker who has had injury issues the last couple of years. he is a perfect fit as a FS in this defense. Chicago plays many similar coverage concepts. Honestly doesn't seem like he has lost a. step, it's more of an injury issue. The other guy who makes some level of sense is Lawrence Guy, a dude who hs some flexibility and would add a non-comp pick affecting body to the DL room. I like both of these ideas a lot 3 Quote
Gregg Posted February 28 Posted February 28 https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/jets-grant-qb-zach-wilson-permission-to-seek-trade/ar-BB1j3Tfv?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=51c30c3d3c2f4eae8f46397792e2c2b8&ei=14 1 Quote
ngbills Posted February 28 Posted February 28 1 hour ago, Warriorspikes51 said: didn’t Beane already “promise” Hines he wouldn’t be cut? Harty had a HUGE PR that won us the division, but he was barely used as an actual WR. I thought he showed some flashes when he was $10M is just way too much on these guys in any year. But with limited cap space that money is needed elsewhere. If these guys are willing to take less money ($2M per) then maybe you keep them. I doubt any team in the league would be paying them more than $2-3M. Quote
Warcodered Posted February 28 Posted February 28 1 hour ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Also Kadarius Toney is being fired from a cannon. I have no idea if that's true it's just a feeling. 4 Quote
Low Positive Posted February 28 Posted February 28 2 minutes ago, Warcodered said: Also Kadarius Toney is being fired from a cannon. I have no idea if that's true it's just a feeling. They would throw him a anchor, but he's probably drop it. 2 Quote
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted February 28 Posted February 28 2 hours ago, ngbills said: $10M is just way too much on these guys in any year. But with limited cap space that money is needed elsewhere. If these guys are willing to take less money ($2M per) then maybe you keep them. I doubt any team in the league would be paying them more than $2-3M. I assume Hines reworks his deal. He has very little in the way of guarantees, and hes coming off a lost season, and is 28. He hits the open market he's looking at like 1-1.5M and maybe a couple hundred K in guarantees. He's also likely without a home for a while sitting on his hands hoping the phone rings. 2yr deal, guarantee some of it, get the cap hit low and that gives you a return man and a speed back/gadget option. You can cut both but then you're back to trying to find a punt returner, which is obnoxious when you already had 2. You could potentially use shakir there, but thats not really a primary option in my head as his role should be on offense. Quote
90sBills Posted February 28 Posted February 28 4 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Should Bills look at him? At least he shows up in the playoffs. 1 1 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted February 28 Author Posted February 28 14 minutes ago, 90sBills said: Should Bills look at him? At least he shows up in the playoffs. get their playbook then cut his *** 😂 1 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted February 29 Author Posted February 29 (edited) unsure what $$ acquiring team would take on? Perhaps he’ll be released If so, we should be interested. Edited February 29 by Warriorspikes51 1 Quote
BillsFanForever19 Posted February 29 Posted February 29 (edited) 7 hours ago, ngbills said: Waiting for Harty and Hines to be added to this list I'd expect Harty to go, but not Hines. Beane's said he has him in his plans for this season. Hines has said he's going to be here. Seems fairly obvious that Beane told him he'd give him a shot this year if he didn't make an issue with the NFLPA over us being able to clear some cap space by not paying him much of anything. And ultimately, what sense does it make for us to have kept him around and paid him anything last season when we could have just cut him right then and there to turn around and cut him now? He's going to be here in Training Camp. And I'm sure he'll have his figure reduced. But if you're waiting for him to show up on a Released list anytime soon, you're in for a let down. Edited February 29 by BillsFanForever19 Quote
Solomon Grundy Posted February 29 Posted February 29 59 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: unsure what $$ acquiring team would take on? Perhaps he’ll be released If so, we should be interested. Should've been the pick years ago!! 2 6 Quote
T master Posted February 29 Posted February 29 20 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Good for them i guess but we already have enough players that know how to drop a pass when they are wide open so i'm thinking HELL NO ... 1 Quote
BuffaloRebound Posted February 29 Posted February 29 13 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said: unsure what $$ acquiring team would take on? Perhaps he’ll be released If so, we should be interested. Acquiring team would owe Mack $23m. That’s steep for a 33 year old. 6 of his 17 sacks came in 1 game. I’d think he’s looking more at a 1 year Leonard Floyd deal than anybody paying $23m for 1 year. Quote
ngbills Posted February 29 Posted February 29 1 hour ago, BuffaloRebound said: Acquiring team would owe Mack $23m. That’s steep for a 33 year old. 6 of his 17 sacks came in 1 game. I’d think he’s looking more at a 1 year Leonard Floyd deal than anybody paying $23m for 1 year. Von Miller says hi Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.