SCBills Posted February 28 Posted February 28 45 minutes ago, aristocrat said: These dudes just wildin out lately or is everyone finally reporting on this stuff after the Laken Riley murder? We’ve got a murder, some manslaughter and few rapes all in the past week.
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted February 28 Posted February 28 “The only reason anyone cares about these heinous crimes and victims thereof is because the perpetrators have brown skin” -roundy or some such childish bullsh*t 1 1 2
US Egg Posted February 28 Posted February 28 34 minutes ago, SCBills said: Many of these Biden desired illegal criminals and their atrocities are reported at the local level. The scum that is LW msm, is doing their best to suppress these crimes being reported on the national level. 1 1
ChiGoose Posted February 28 Posted February 28 …what do conservatives believe that “sanctuary city” actually means? And if they buy into the ridiculous fallacy of an “open border,” why do they (wrongly) believe that Dems support that? 1
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted February 28 Posted February 28 3 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: …what do conservatives believe that “sanctuary city” actually means? And if they buy into the ridiculous fallacy of an “open border,” why do they (wrongly) believe that Dems support that? It’s a city that does not follow federal law regarding illegal immigrants. Right? How is that working out for cities that proudly proclaim themselves sanctuaries? https://www.politico.com/news/2024/02/27/adams-sanctuary-city-laws-new-york-00143705 All the “human trafficking” that delivered these people from under bridges in Texas to America’s great metropolitan areas seems to have caused some heartburn. 1 2
BillsFanNC Posted February 28 Author Posted February 28 You have to hand it to the King. You really do. When it decides to reappear down here, it always manages to so with a huge bang of stupidity. Long live The King! 1
US Egg Posted February 28 Posted February 28 (edited) 1 hour ago, JDHillFan said: It’s a city that does not follow federal law regarding illegal immigrants. Right? How is that working out for cities that proudly proclaim themselves sanctuaries? https://www.politico.com/news/2024/02/27/adams-sanctuary-city-laws-new-york-00143705 All the “human trafficking” that delivered these people from under bridges in Texas to America’s great metropolitan areas seems to have caused some heartburn. Adams cries ring hollow at this point. He won’t get what he is asking, he knows it. His masters used him, they accomplished what they wanted under his watch. He will forever be known as the mayor who put the worm in the Big 🍎. Edited February 28 by US Egg 1
US Egg Posted February 28 Posted February 28 Rest assured Democrat judges are the ones releasing these repeat criminal animals. Each one of them, judges and predators, are sick fux bent on savaging society.
SydneyBillsFan Posted February 28 Posted February 28 Serious question: Would the reaction of the fake news media in the US be any different if it were, say, a black activist lesbian or a transgender person? 1
BillsFanNC Posted February 28 Author Posted February 28 31 minutes ago, SydneyBillsFan said: Serious question: Would the reaction of the fake news media in the US be any different if it were, say, a black activist lesbian or a transgender person? Yes In the hierarchy of oppression: Black activist lesbian > Brown male migrant >>>>>> white female college student.
SydneyBillsFan Posted February 28 Posted February 28 15 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Yes In the hierarchy of oppression: Black activist lesbian > Brown male migrant >>>>>> white female college student. Sheesh. I shudder to think where a white, Christian, hetero, beer n' sports alpha male (ie - me) sits on that list. Actually, I already know. The woke hierarchy is the same down under. 1
ChiGoose Posted February 28 Posted February 28 8 hours ago, JDHillFan said: It’s a city that does not follow federal law regarding illegal immigrants. Right? How is that working out for cities that proudly proclaim themselves sanctuaries? https://www.politico.com/news/2024/02/27/adams-sanctuary-city-laws-new-york-00143705 All the “human trafficking” that delivered these people from under bridges in Texas to America’s great metropolitan areas seems to have caused some heartburn. It is simply that they do not hand people over to ICE if they suspect they are undocumented. The reason municipalities enact sanctuary policy is because undocumented people who are witnesses or victims of crime won’t report the crime if they fear they will be deported for doing so. Sanctuary policy allows them to contact law enforcement without risking their own deportation, increasing the chance that they report crime. That’s likely why municipalities that enact such policies don’t see an increase in crime and often actually see a decrease in crime. 1
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted February 28 Posted February 28 12 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: It is simply that they do not hand people over to ICE if they suspect they are undocumented. The reason municipalities enact sanctuary policy is because undocumented people who are witnesses or victims of crime won’t report the crime if they fear they will be deported for doing so. Sanctuary policy allows them to contact law enforcement without risking their own deportation, increasing the chance that they report crime. That’s likely why municipalities that enact such policies don’t see an increase in crime and often actually see a decrease in crime. I wonder why the mayors of these cities feel the need to virtue signal their sanctuary status if that’s all it is. Any chance it had something to do with the orange menace? I also think it might be time for that study to be updated. I noticed the date of the article is from the summer of 2022. The picture at the top of the article is of Denver. Based on what I’ve read lately I don’t think they’re super happy with how being a sanctuary city is working out for them. You can champion the concept of sanctuary city until the cows come home. I will just see what’s before me and make my own assessment. 1
Doc Posted February 28 Posted February 28 6 hours ago, US Egg said: Rest assured Democrat judges are the ones releasing these repeat criminal animals. Each one of them, judges and predators, are sick fux bent on savaging society. Time to start holding them accountable. 1
ChiGoose Posted February 28 Posted February 28 34 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: I wonder why the mayors of these cities feel the need to virtue signal their sanctuary status if that’s all it is. Any chance it had something to do with the orange menace? I also think it might be time for that study to be updated. I noticed the date of the article is from the summer of 2022. The picture at the top of the article is of Denver. Based on what I’ve read lately I don’t think they’re super happy with how being a sanctuary city is working out for them. You can champion the concept of sanctuary city until the cows come home. I will just see what’s before me and make my own assessment. The article states why sanctuary cities became popular and it pre-dates Trump: "Sanctuary policies became more consequential after 2009, when ICE implemented Secure Communities, a program that linked FBI databases with Department of Homeland Security databases to automatically check the citizenship status of anyone arrested anywhere in the country. By January 2013, ICE had activated such data-sharing technology in all state and local jails in the country, allowing them to track potential noncitizens and request law enforcement agencies to detain them for questioning, or be notified upon their release. Some local law enforcement agencies declined to honor these detainer and notification requests. Jurisdictions that declined to participate, Ascherio said, cited concerns that Secure Communities would penalize immigrant victims or witnesses of crimes and thus undermine community-police relationships." I haven't championed anything. Just trying to put some facts into the discussion that has been severely lacking them.
BillsFanNC Posted February 28 Author Posted February 28 And The King doubles down! People who have already broken US law need to be incentivized to report crimes, perhaps even crimes committed by other illegals who break still more laws. I wonder maybe if it was an illegal who was sufficiently incentivized to report the IDs of the illegals who beatdown NYC police officers, were subsequently released and then gave America the finger? Maybe it was an illegal, trusting in the sanctuary city of Athens to not jeopardize their free ride on taxpayer dime, who was confidently able to finger the illegal who disfigured the skull of a local college student? Only useful idiots can be this out of touch. They are forever lost. 35 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: I wonder why the mayors of these cities feel the need to virtue signal their sanctuary status if that’s all it is. Any chance it had something to do with the orange menace? I also think it might be time for that study to be updated. I noticed the date of the article is from the summer of 2022. The picture at the top of the article is of Denver. Based on what I’ve read lately I don’t think they’re super happy with how being a sanctuary city is working out for them. You can champion the concept of sanctuary city until the cows come home. I will just see what’s before me and make my own assessment. Always, always find the paper, the methods, author(s) background and the funding source if you can find it. This researcher has moved on from UT-Austin to U Chicago, right in The Kings backyard! Her current title? Assistant Professor in Criminal Justice Sciences and Latin American and Latinx/a/o Studies Latinx you say? 😂 I wonder if the paper is even written, let alone gets gets published if the data told a different story? Speaking of the data, I couldn't get full access since it is in a friggin sociology journal, but here's a portion of the methods. Probably needs updating, huh King? In order to investigate whether and to what extent sanctuary practice are associated with crime, I assembled an original dataset drawing on multiple sources at the county-level. The main dataset includes 3,105 counties for a total of 12,420 county-year observations from 2013 to 2016, which are over 98% of all 3,143 counties and county-equivalents in the United States. Counties in Alaska, Hawaii, and outlying islands are not included.
Recommended Posts