TheFunPolice Posted February 14 Posted February 14 I think we'll see more and more QBs playing well into their 40's, because a lot of not doing it was mental, and the fact that it didn't happen much. I was listening to some pre-game coverage of the Super Bowl on Sirius XM, and they were doing the annual Joe Montana interview. He was talking about his time in KC and how he really regrets retiring when he did at age 38. He said he was "stupid" for doing it, and had some good years left. It made me think about how the game has changed. Back in the day, Montana being 38 was ancient. By then most guys were busted up, crippled versions of themselves. Yet here's "Joe Cool" saying he wishes he played another few seasons, into his 40's, at a time when that was unthinkable. Now, 40 is nothing. Brady played in 3 Super Bowls after age 40, winning 2. Diet is different, training is different, rules are different to protect QBs more and more, the offseason programs are different. IMO, a QBs prime years are also different. Physically it still might be the years from 27-33 or so, but mentally, which is more important for a QB, it might actually be their mid 30's, when the great ones become like another OC playing the game because they've done it for so long and the plays and reading defenses become second nature. Take Rodgers for example. He tore his Achilles at age 39 and by his 40th birthday 77 days later he was back at practice slinging the ball and (for some dumb reason) trying to intercept balls on defense. 15 years ago that injury happens to a 39 year old QB and they are done. A guy like Kirk Cousins who turns 36 this coming season was just at the NFL Honors show doing a comedy dance routine on his newly repaired Achilles and just played some of his best football the past couple seasons. He could sign somewhere and be a very effective to great 7 year starter there, easily. I could easily see Allen and Mahomes playing into their 40's, barring any major injuries. QBs retain their arm strength and accuracy, gain the mental edge, and have rules that protect them from the type of shots that guys like Kelly, Montana and Marino took game in and game out. 4 Quote
Process Posted February 14 Posted February 14 I don't see it. We literally have one example in NFL history of a guy playing at that level into their 40s. Several examples of guys breaking down before than (Peyton, Ben, Rivers etc) 5 1 Quote
KingBoots8 Posted February 14 Posted February 14 (edited) I think we will see QB’s playing longer for sure, so long as their skills don’t dull too much and their pay keeps pace. Location also matters- Megatron retired in his prime because the team was unwilling to either acquire talent to challenge for a title and was not willing to let him go. He was burned out and said he was done. the right QB, with the right team/ownership, and the right skills will play until the money or skills start to wilt. I expect more QB’s to keep playing, but only at a high enough level. Edited February 14 by KingBoots8 2 Quote
corta765 Posted February 14 Posted February 14 QBs are def playing longer with less hit and the game geared for offense. But 40 still is far different and Brady really was unique as he was a temple to his body to keep it so healthy and other then his knee in 08 never had another major injury. It is rare to have that injury luck, lack of wearing down on the body, and discipline health wise so I would say 40 will forever be rare for QBs. I do expect though far more high caliber QBs to hold their production much longer into their late 30s where high QB play for guys 35-36-37-38 is way more common. It use to be QBs came into the league, made their mark, got paid, and then by 32-33 the wheels came off. That I do think is far different and good QBs now have four phases 1. rookie QB contract build around guy to max // paid top time pt1 // paid top time pt2 // true regression and fading. I truly good QB I think will have 3-4 core group of guys in their lifetime as the team reloads. Josh has played with one core group which is fading. The second group is here now as guys like Cook, Kincaid, Torrence, Bernard, Benford, Oliver all are here for the next 5-6 years. If we are lucky Josh probably goes into a third group while still be really good for a few years. That to me is where the QB position has changed as if you got your QB to two core groups of guys it was really good. Going three strong which is 15-18 year life span is not unreasonable now. 1 Quote
TheFunPolice Posted February 14 Author Posted February 14 14 minutes ago, Process said: I don't see it. We literally have one example in NFL history of a guy playing at that level into their 40s. Several examples of guys breaking down before than (Peyton, Ben, Rivers etc) I think there are some specific reasons in those cases though. Ben didn't seem to believe in exercise and looked like an OT his last season or 2. Peyton and Rivers suffered a lot of injuries that piled up, and both started playing in a era that allowed a lot more vicious hits. These guys starting off now never played in that NFL. It's certainly true that to play into your 40's you first need to be very good, get a little lucky, but also be committed. The younger guys today are in such better hsape physically that I think it's realistic. Even Brady talks about how in his 20's he was nowhere near in the type of physical shape he was when he was in his late 30's. He ate burgers, drank beer, and had not yet started drinking kitten blood and eating souls. Not sure about the last part, but I think I heard it somewhere... 1 1 Quote
Gigs Posted February 14 Posted February 14 Back in the early 2000s it was still normal to see a QB after just 30 as still good but past their prime. When we traded for a 30/31 year old Drew Bledsoe for a 1st it was said we overpaid for an ooooold QB past his best games. Then the game changed and now you can't really destroy a QB. If it was the old way, Brady would've made it to maybe 39/40 and would've been a shell of himself and especially the 44 year old TB we all saw. That's what you're seeing. Human physiology didn't change in 20 years, but the QBs got super protected in that time frame. Allen and Mahomes will most likely make it to 38-40 and be done. I don't really see Rodgers playing beyond this season outside of trying to earn another bag. Now if they make QBs 2 hand touch tackle you could see guys in their 50s playing, because at that point old timers like Hogan and Flair are still taking WWE bumps, why not 50+ year old Brady? Quote
GoBills808 Posted February 14 Posted February 14 I actually see it going backwards tbh QBs are asked to do more physically and they're making tons more $$ 2 3 Quote
TheFunPolice Posted February 14 Author Posted February 14 A lot has to do with the commitment too. Rivers has like 10 kids, so I could see him wanting to spend more time with family and not wanting to be on the road all the time. I've heard both Lamar and Mahomes say their goal is to play well into their 40's, so I think younger guys coming in have that idea early on and are taking the steps early on to try to do what Brady did, which he really didn't start doing until he was 35+ years old. 15 minutes ago, KingBoots8 said: I think we will see QB’s playing longer for sure, so long as their skills don’t dull too much and their pay keeps pace. Location also matters- Megatron retired in his prime because the team was unwilling to either acquire talent to challenge for a title and was not willing to let him go. He was burned out and said he was done. the right QB, with the right team/ownership, and the right skills will play until the money or skills start to wilt. I expect more QB’s to keep playing, but only at a high enough level. That's a huge part of it: the team around a guy and how things are going. If you're 40, are still great, are reasonably healthy, and your long time team seems to have a whole bunch of young up and coming star players and a coach you love, then it's a lot easier to commit to a few more years of winning, going to the playoffs, and having chances at the Super Bowl than if you're on New England and stuck in the basement! Quote
Another Fan Posted February 14 Posted February 14 Good topic OP Double edged sword to me : on the one hand the QB's are protected now more than ever and the increased awareness of health and nutrition can prolong their careers. On the other hand it seems like the learning curve for younger QB's is now gone or at least not what it was. I can definitely see back up QB's playing well into their 40s. Tyrod comes to mind Quote
MJS Posted February 14 Posted February 14 If it is the new norm, why don't we have more than one example of it? Brady is the only QB to play at that level at 40+. I don't see anything changing. In fact, QB's have to be more mobile than ever. Athleticism at the QB position is at an all time high. It might be that we never see another QB play to their 40's. Quote
Lost Posted February 14 Posted February 14 25 minutes ago, Process said: I don't see it. We literally have one example in NFL history of a guy playing at that level into their 40s. Several examples of guys breaking down before than (Peyton, Ben, Rivers etc) Aside from Brady, Brett Favre had statistically one of his best seasons at age 40. Quote
Sweats Posted February 14 Posted February 14 Go back and see some of the footage before QB's were protected so much these days. It was brutal warfare going on against the QB's....low hits, chop blocks, guys getting their legs rolled up on, hits to the head, etc. Many of a QB careers were cut short due to the beatings. 1 Quote
Returntoglory Posted February 14 Posted February 14 Yeah. Asong as you're healthy, no loss of arm talent AND still have the desire. Quote
Gregg Posted February 14 Posted February 14 3 minutes ago, Sweats said: Go back and see some of the footage before QB's were protected so much these days. It was brutal warfare going on against the QB's....low hits, chop blocks, guys getting their legs rolled up on, hits to the head, etc. Many of a QB careers were cut short due to the beatings. We saw it with Kelly. Defenses could hit the crap out of offensive players back then. Today not so much. Quote
FireChans Posted February 14 Posted February 14 32 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: I actually see it going backwards tbh QBs are asked to do more physically and they're making tons more $$ Agreed. What is more likely? Mahomes retires early or plays til 40? If he gets to 4-5 SB’s over the next 3 years, I could easily see him walking. 1 Quote
Heels20X6 Posted February 14 Posted February 14 12 minutes ago, FireChans said: Agreed. What is more likely? Mahomes retires early or plays til 40? If he gets to 4-5 SB’s over the next 3 years, I could easily see him walking. No chance...he is driven by the want to be the greatest of all time now. If he can still go, he will play til he can set every record possible. I can see him pulling a Tom and being a mercenary at the end for good teams once KC's window closes 1 Quote
FilthyBeast Posted February 14 Posted February 14 It's not the new norm until we see multiple guys play well into their 40's, compete and a high level and most importantly win championships This one of many reasons Brady is still the unquestioned GOAT is because of what he did in his late 30's and well into his 40's. And most will tell you he truly aged like fine wine and became much better later in his career vs early on in his 20's when he won the first 3 SB's. And even though Mahomes is on pace to at worse match Brady, who knows if he's still as good 10 years from now. He may peak soon or already has...or simply isn't going to be blessed with the same health factors that enabled Brady to do what he did for so long. A freak injury could derail everything regardless. Quote
BillsShredder83 Posted February 14 Posted February 14 (edited) QB protecting rules. Also, like OP mentioned the mental aspect. Makes me think of the, anmd im paraphrasing, but the 3 or 4minute mile seemed untouchable for a long time. Someone did it, and it opened the flood gates. Also, better living through science. HGH is great for the sport despite what the dorks think. HGH isnt even a compound that makes you big or a freak, its hugely popular in Hollywood for anti-aging..... ya know that older chick J-Lo, Jennifer Love Hewitt etc etc, that has been hot and looks the same into her 50's? Yep, thats a component. Great for joints and ligaments strength and flexibility. As we age they tend to get more stiff and less flexible. GH in the body decreases as we age. Remember when you could sleep in, but now you wake up at 5-6am no matter what time you went to bed or how tired you are... low GH GH isnt going to make the man, but it amplifies the s*** out of what these guys are already doing to take care of their bodies. Then recovery peptides like BPC157 and TB500 for nagging/serious injuries. I know people hate the idea of this stuff in the sport, but its rampant and these things make the sport better. These arent magic double your season output type compounds, these are keep your teams healthier/able to grind through 17games, with some luck, without missing significant time type compounds. I fully understand (although respectfully disagree) most fans not wanting guys running 25 week tren/d-bol/test cycles all over the field. I'll shout it from the mountain tops, GH is not that, fans need to accept that and move forward thankful for it. In 20years were going to laugh this was ever a controversy. There was likely a time everyone thought creatine, whey, hyperbaric (bolic? i forget) chambers were cheating LOL.... we mind as well just go back to smoking cigs on the sidelines again HAHAHAHAHAHA Also, before someone shouts Lyle Alzado: #1 guy was taking the substances im not referencing #2 poor guys claims were emotion driven, understandably, but just not based in facts. correlation is not causation, or we'd see this NON-STOP in sports. we dont PS, Brady being to first to do it, in the same time frame as these compounds isnt a coincidence. You'd have to believe WWF was real to think that. As much as he terrorized us, he is a marquee example of why the NFL is turning a blind eye, and hopefully the lesser known players/positions are following suit. Why would we not want the best athletes to stick around? Do we prefer the Gale Sanders, Bo Jackson, Sterling Sharpe, Terrell Davis, Tony Bosseli, type player timelines? Edited February 14 by BillsShredder83 Quote
BillsShredder83 Posted February 14 Posted February 14 1 hour ago, FireChans said: Agreed. What is more likely? Mahomes retires early or plays til 40? If he gets to 4-5 SB’s over the next 3 years, I could easily see him walking. You're thinking like a rational human. You dont get to the top of a career like this with a personality that can just decide to hit the "off-switch". Does Warren Buffett still need to make more money? LOL. these dudes are singular driven cyborgs. the dudes who arent that get filtered out mentality wise at the college/early NFL levels. 8 billion people, and hes better than anyone else in the world, and you think a guy who can just shut it down has a chance to be where he is. nooooooo chanceeeeeeeee 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.