Ghost of BiB Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Mmm.....squab. 357845[/snapback] Wouldn't be enough left to make a pate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 The people of California deserve better prosecutors. They put on a lousy case. I think Michael Jackson is a pathetic freak and would not be surprised to learn he was a pervert too but ... the best they could come up with was a bunch of con artists, what did they expect. The funniest part is Marcia Clark's commenting on how SHOCKED she is...it must be the smog or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 The funniest part is Marcia Clark's commenting on how SHOCKED she is...it must be the smog or something. 357911[/snapback] Marcia Clark = RJ I'd rather take legal advice from Arthur C Clark, and i think he's dead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 I think Michael may have molested kids in the past, but this past case was bogus, perpetrated by a gold-digging mother and an overzealous prosecutor. They should have tried him YEARS ago and maybe they would have gotten a conviction. And what strikes me is that, not only did they NOT find any kiddie porn after thoroughly searching his ranch, they didn't even find any homosexual adult porn. But they found lots of heterosexual adult porn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Just let him go. Yeah, he's being stupid...but it's best not to argue. 357732[/snapback] Well said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Marcia Clark = RJ I'd rather take legal advice from Arthur C Clark, and i think he's dead 357913[/snapback] Napoleon Dynamite = RJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 I'd rather take legal advice from Arthur C Clark, and i think he's dead 357913[/snapback] Nope, he's still alive. Living on Sri Lanka...was teaching diving until the tsunami wiped out his diving school. 90 years old, teaching scuba...I'm a third his age (roughly), and I couldn't dive or write as well as him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Just let him go. Yeah, he's being stupid...but it's best not to argue. 357732[/snapback] After having cooled off, yes, the post WAS stupid, because it implied that ALL liberals are glad to see him walk, which cannot be true. That said, I still have a feeling that not too many conservatives were crying tears of joy and releasing white doves with each not guilty verdict. He will do it again. Pedophiles as a rule cannot stop. The next time, I hope that they arrest the parents, along with this waste of human flesh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 After having cooled off, yes, the post WAS stupid, because it implied that ALL liberals are glad to see him walk, which cannot be true. That said, I still have a feeling that not too many conservatives were crying tears of joy and releasing white doves with each not guilty verdict. He will do it again. Pedophiles as a rule cannot stop. The next time, I hope that they arrest the parents, along with this waste of human flesh. 358115[/snapback] I thought I heard something about many of the "supporters" were from other countries. Releasing doves sounds like French Close Air Support, to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Nope, he's still alive. Living on Sri Lanka...was teaching diving until the tsunami wiped out his diving school. 90 years old, teaching scuba 357959[/snapback] thanks for the info Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 I started reading the prosecutions case last week and realized they were just throwing darts. Why even bring this to trial ? How could a jury convict him on hearsay evidence ? Nothing concrete. Yes, MJ is a sick freak but based on the case that was presented, he couldn't be convicted in any U.S. court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 After having cooled off, yes, the post WAS stupid, because it implied that ALL liberals are glad to see him walk, which cannot be true. That said, I still have a feeling that not too many conservatives were crying tears of joy and releasing white doves with each not guilty verdict. I doubt many liberals were either. Face facts: the dove lady was neither liberal nor conservative, but whacked in the head and representing the "whacked in the head" minority in the country that typically votes for Lyndon LaRouche or Frank Zappa anyway... He will do it again. Pedophiles as a rule cannot stop. The next time, I hope that they arrest the parents, along with this waste of human flesh. 358115[/snapback] Pedophiles as a rule also start to exhibit the behavior in their late teens or early 20's. When's the first allegation against Jackson...when he was about 35 or so? At the very least, he doesn't follow the normal pattern of pedophiles to begin with... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 I started reading the prosecutions case last week and realized they were just throwing darts. Why even bring this to trial ? How could a jury convict him on hearsay evidence ? Nothing concrete. Yes, MJ is a sick freak but based on the case that was presented, he couldn't be convicted in any U.S. court. 358209[/snapback] That's usually the way these types (child molestation) of trials go; physical evidence is not always forthcoming, and the case often boils down to "He said, he said". And even given THAT, it was still a weak case. The prosecution was !@#$ing stupid bringing this case to trial. Heard a talking head on the radio this morning lamenting on how this case sets a bad precedent in that a child molester can't be convicted solely on a child witness' testimony. Huh? Last I checked, no one's ever convicted solely on the uncorroborated testimony of the complainant. Morons...there is so much idiocy surrounding this case... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PTS Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 I got a great idea for a reality TV show. TITLE: Celebrity Assassins INFO: Has-been actors, actresses, musicians and other has-been celebrities are hired as assassins in California to make extra loot. The show will follow how these new b-list celebrity assassins are contacted, the negotiation process, the actual murder (who doesn't love seeing that on TV) and the subsequent trial and exoneration. I'm thinking this is probably a show for HBO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMadCap Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 This is FAR worse than the OJ case. There is no explanation for sodomizing children, other than being a sociopath; someone who does not deserve the gift of human life. I doubt if anyone on this board has seen the face of a child victim, or heard the cries of their parents. They are sights and sounds that are not possible to forget. Liberals must cherish this verdict and hold it dear. There were enough of them outside of the court holding signs and crying tears of joy. One lunatic released a white dove with every "not guilty" count. Jesse Jackson is pleased. In any event, congrats to you leftists. That said, watch your children, please. 357619[/snapback] Change the record dude.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Change the record dude.... 358352[/snapback] This is the B side. I'd tell you what was on the A side, but he'd call me a stalker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 This is the B side. I'd tell you what was on the A side, but he'd call me a stalker. 358369[/snapback] Anything new in your gay crusade? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Anything new in your gay crusade? 358447[/snapback] You're so cute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 You're so cute. 358468[/snapback] Especially when he wears those short shorts to the gym... ...but hey, look who I'm telling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted June 14, 2005 Author Share Posted June 14, 2005 Especially when he wears those short shorts to the gym... ...but hey, look who I'm telling. 358548[/snapback] You guys are incorrigible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts