BarleyNY Posted February 8 Posted February 8 (edited) 22 hours ago, BillMafia716ix said: How you guys feeling on James Cook as a number 1 back? With Brady taking over full time James Cook should see an increase workload. Fumbles and drops have been an issue with him though. I still think he’s too small to be an every down back. Personally I would like to see use him like Detroit uses Gibbs and find a quality #2. I like Ty Johnson but could we find better? I think we are in very good shape with Cook as RB1. I like him a lot in that role. But we need a quality RB2. Joe Marino talked about this on Locked On Bills on the RB episode. Cook had over 300 touches (315 IiRC). That is about double his next highest year, including college. He clearly broke down late in the season and in the playoffs and was less efficient overall - and more prone to drops. Notably his workload increased under Brady so this happened even with a lighter load in the first 10 games. So if Brady’s offense is going to utilize the RB as much as it did last season, getting a quality RB2 is of paramount importance. We could also use a good short yardage back whether that’s part of our RB2’s skill set or our RB3’s. Edited February 9 by BarleyNY 1 Quote
GunnerBill Posted February 8 Posted February 8 4 minutes ago, ddaryl said: him dropping passes is worrisome. They are concentration drops though. His hands are pretty good. The number of time Josh checked down to him this year and he held the ball despite getting levelled as he caught it was considerable. It is just concentration especially in the redzone. 1 Quote
QB Bills Posted February 8 Posted February 8 He's not a heady player. Not devoid of talent but he's the kind of guy that will always have you worried that a terrible mistake is just around the corner and will lose you the game. He would have fit in well with the drought era Bills among guys like McKelvin and Spiller. Quote
T master Posted February 8 Posted February 8 I think in his exit interviews Beane & McD told him that he really needs to emphasize his work on the jugs machine this off season !! Quote
Gregg Posted February 8 Posted February 8 He is a good player. He has things to work on this offseason like every player does. But for the first time in a long time the Bills had a running game besides #17. Quote
colin Posted February 8 Posted February 8 he has a couple of well mentioned bad habits, but unless they persist over time we have to assume they can be corrected. he was super productive for us, and we had really good drives where we featured him. he might not be as "good" as a lot of guys (say 12? i dunno) but at the end of the day we need production. he's very productive. that's why knox kinda blows and kinkaid is great, dawson doesn't produce and Kinkaid does. that's also why diggs' contract is so bloody concerning (von miller too obv). in the case of stef, he is still really good over the last season, but his production late and particularly in the playoffs is cheeks. this is also why we'd like to keep floyd and or aj, they are productive albeit not consistently and clearly not game changing players. i think KC copied the rams model, when we kinda have to copy, where you focus on a few total super stars and rely on them, and then everyone else can get filled in by whoever performs, including rookies and cheaper FA players. KC even let a true super star (hill) go because they realized the cost of keeping him (30 a year!, like 25% more than we pay diggs but for a player is much more than 25% better IMO) vs what they get getting rid of him (a pick from miami, and all that juicy juicy cap space). our signing of miller and so on obv ended up hurting us, but i really think our biggest mistakes were in contracts we paid to extend guys we already had (diggs, knox, keeping poy and hyde a season too long, etc). Quote
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted February 8 Posted February 8 11 hours ago, Chaos said: He was not particularly effective in the Redzone. https://www.fantasypros.com/nfl/red-zone-stats/rb.php?range=full Wow. Thanks for posting this. I toggled over to QB, and you can really see how dominant Allen was on the ground inside the red zone. His YPA at 4.06 would have him in the top 10 of RB's. He also had 33 attempts which is top 25 for RB's and in the ball park ( 30 - 36 red zone attempts each) of Gibbs, Aaron Jones, Jacobs, Jonthan Taylor and Henry. All of whom had YPC in the red zone under 3.0 accept for Jones and Gibbs at 3.3 Among QB's Allen's YPA was double Hurts and about 0.2 higher than Lamar's. Some want to knock Allen for his 15 rushing TD's with about 5 of them being tush pushes this year, nearly all of them 5 coming in the final 5 games of the season too for some reason. But his rushing success in the red zone puts him on par with the good running backs in the league. Nobody would knock a RB for carrying the ball and doing well in the red zone. Quote
ddaryl Posted February 8 Posted February 8 31 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: They are concentration drops though. His hands are pretty good. The number of time Josh checked down to him this year and he held the ball despite getting levelled as he caught it was considerable. It is just concentration especially in the redzone. Yeah.. I know there was 1 game where I thought we were seeing the 2nd coming of Thruman Thomas... But the drops I remember after that game we're like you said "concentration" drops because he was so wide open and yet the ball hit the ground. hopefully he can fix it, but like Knox I worry Quote
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted February 8 Posted February 8 39 minutes ago, TheyCallMeAndy said: Cook, statistically averaged 2 yards after contact and had 482 yards after contact on the season. For a 200 pound RB, that isn’t bad. Yeah, I thought he was actually really good picking up tough yards. It may have been the first New England game that we blew where I really noticed he was turning carries that should have been stopped for no gain into 3-4 yard gains consistently. 1 Quote
Mister Defense Posted February 8 Posted February 8 12 hours ago, BillMafia716ix said: How you guys feeling on James Cook as a number 1 back? With Brady taking over full time James Cook should see an increase workload. Fumbles and drops have been an issue with him though. I still think he’s too small to be an every down back. Personally I would like to see use him like Detroit uses Gibbs and find a quality #2. I like Ty Johnson but could we find better? I think the lack of talk about the need for a very high quality back in the draft or free agency is missing element of off season talk so far. Cook is great, will be a superb weapon. But he will be much better, more dynamic, and last a lot longer once the Bills get a young, PHYSICAL back, who could block well, to compliment him. You can't just keep using Cook as that type of back, as he is very slight, one of the smallest backs I have seen in the NFL--not a pound it into the line kind of back, not a wear down the defense physically kind of back. While fans have not said much about this, the Bills' commitment to the running game with Brady, indicate to me they know how important of a need this is. I am confident that they will aggressively pursue this need in the off season. Johnson is also a good 3rd back to have and I assume they will resign him as well. Quote
NastyNateSoldiers Posted February 8 Posted February 8 11 hours ago, BillMafia716ix said: How you guys feeling on James Cook as a number 1 back? With Brady taking over full time James Cook should see an increase workload. Fumbles and drops have been an issue with him though. I still think he’s too small to be an every down back. Personally I would like to see use him like Detroit uses Gibbs and find a quality #2. I like Ty Johnson but could we find better? Couldn't agree with u more he needs to be used like Gibbs. He also needs some serious time working on the jugs machine this off-season as well as working with Josh Allen and getting there timing down. Cook is not built for 325 touches maybe 200-240 the most but anything over that is to much. He wore down towards the end of the season and his play dropped drastically. He can use another 5-10 lbs of muscle but on that frame not sure its douable. I truly believe Cook season was not necessarily because he's great at RB but because he's a product of Josh Allen and fact that we see less 6 man boxes then any team in the NFL not only that but the oline was awesome this season. Now I won't take away from him that he did get much better last off-season and that he'll probably even get better this off-season but I'm a true believe if the Bills had an elite RB he would be much better and would make more of a difference for us then Cook had vs the Chiefs in the playoffs. Now does that mean we should try to sign Barkley? I'm not on board with that because of his price but that shouldn't hold the Bills back from trying to find a better player in the mid to late rds of the draft or to bring in someone to compete with him via free agency. Quote
KentuckyBillsFan Posted February 8 Posted February 8 Good player but I don't think he's a long term 3 down back. Bills should invest in a mid-late round RB pick in my opinion. Gladly welcome the Bills finally making a competent running game a focus. Quote
Don Otreply Posted February 8 Posted February 8 12 hours ago, Westside said: He seems to disappear in games. I would love to see more consistent next year. He doesn’t disappear, his usage disappears at times. This comes back to personnel usage discussions we see brought up here with some regularity. The usage “issue” is part in parcel of why our offense looks disjointed/awkward at times. It is on the OC and his staff to utilize our “weapons” in a seamless fashion, it comes down to play design ,play call sequences and situational awareness. Dorsey was pounded for his inability to achieve those things with regularity. Situational awareness during games is key to keeping the offense humming, it is my belief/hope that Brady and Company will achieve a higher level of situational awareness during games and call plays that in turn benefit the following plays that are called…, a guy can hope right? Quote
Realist Posted February 8 Posted February 8 57 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: They are concentration drops though. His hands are pretty good. The number of time Josh checked down to him this year and he held the ball despite getting levelled as he caught it was considerable. It is just concentration especially in the redzone. I believe all of his drops were when he had running room, not when he was about to get hit. It seems like he's looking where to go before he pulls in the ball. Agree, concentration issue. 1 1 Quote
PBF81 Posted February 8 Posted February 8 (edited) Apart from the Dallas game where the entire team was hitting on all cylinders, Cook averaged a pathetic 3.7 yards-per-carry under Brady. We'll see whether that continues. Any perceived increase in team rushing production came from Allen. It is what it is. Edited February 8 by PBF81 1 2 Quote
Logic Posted February 8 Posted February 8 I like Cook a lot. He had 1500 yards from scrimmage and six touchdowns. That's a VERY good running back season in the 2024 NFL! What I'd like to see going forward to get as much mileage out of him as humanly possible is this: 1. Draft or sign a high quality RB2. Yes, I like Ty Johnson. He's a very good RB3. I'd like a 1b to Cook's 1a, solely because with Cook's size, I'd like to keep him fresh and healthy. Cook, while talented, is also not a great red zone running back, and having JOSH ALLEN SMASH be your primary red zone run play is not sustainable long term. 2. Draft and sign downfield receiving threats and spend the offseason scheming up the deep game and attempting to fix the "no explosive plays" problem that crept in this season. As the downfield passing game opens up, there should be more room for Cook to operate in the running (and short passing) game. And lastly...has anyone else noticed that the dude seems to have loosened up, dropped his shoulders, and actually smiles and seems to be having fun now? Love that. The future is bright for James Cook. It'll be even brighter if we get him a complimentary back and a deep passing game. 2 1 Quote
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted February 8 Posted February 8 Definitely a number #1 in the current NFL. The current model seems to be "by committee" unless you have a special back, and honestly CMC and Cook fall into that category. Even they have #2 support. Solid #2 hard running options are usually cheap to pick up (see Damien Harris and Ty Johnson) 1 3 Quote
bigK14094 Posted February 8 Posted February 8 13 hours ago, Beast said: Cook was 3rd in yards from scrimmage for all running backs. What else needs to be said? What about turnover ranking though? 1 Quote
phypon Posted February 8 Posted February 8 He's a bargain on a rookie contract. Easily replaceable and nothing exceptional. When a practice squad guy can come in and pick up the more difficult yardage you let him test the market when the time comes. I know, his brother that put him on the map also has the same last name. He's not elite, he's adequate. Has some fumbling and catching issues. He's fine for now, but he's no Thurman Thomas. I'd prefer a bruising back as the number 1 and a back like cook as the number 2. 2 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.