John from Riverside Posted February 22 Posted February 22 55 minutes ago, Pokebball said: Well, the narrative began as the House killing the bill. Totally false as the bill didn't reach the House (if we're talking the same bill). Senators (both Dem and Republican) voted against the bill in the Senate. It failed. The narrative was never that the house killed. The bill left to do their jobs that bill would’ve passed. It has always been about Trump killing that bill so that he could run on it don’t kid yourself. The house killing the bill came from there, being a maga of representatives that have been ***** up everything ever since they’re Republicans to go over the house They take their orders from Trump The real question is if Trump doesn’t win the presidency, then what? 1 1
Doc Posted February 22 Posted February 22 8 hours ago, John from Riverside said: In what way does this change the fact that Trump killed that border deal? What makes you think Trump killed it? And who cares anyway? It was clearly a bad bill. 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 22 Posted February 22 11 minutes ago, Doc said: What makes you think Trump killed it? And who cares anyway? It was clearly a bad bill. Trump is simply echoing the views of the majority of American citizens. They want this invasion shut down ASAFP. The entrenched leadership of both party's aren't fooling anyone. Everybody knows its a ploy to get money to fund wars and all the border security provisions will be ignored like business as usual since day one of Joe Biden's regime. 1
John from Riverside Posted February 22 Posted February 22 42 minutes ago, Doc said: What makes you think Trump killed it? And who cares anyway? It was clearly a bad bill. I doubt that you have even read it
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted February 22 Posted February 22 1 hour ago, John from Riverside said: I doubt that you have even read it Please tell us that YOU read the 370 page bill - light by government standards. I know you pretended to read the report on Biden’s mishandling of classified information but had no clue about the classification level of the documents involved - despite it being spelled out in the report. The “did you read it” schtick is a bit much coming from someone that struggles to string coherent sentences together. 1
BillStime Posted February 22 Author Posted February 22 10 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Please tell us that YOU read the 370 page bill - light by government standards. I know you pretended to read the report on Biden’s mishandling of classified information but had no clue about the classification level of the documents involved - despite it being spelled out in the report. The “did you read it” schtick is a bit much coming from someone that struggles to string coherent sentences together. Who are these idiots fooling?
Pokebball Posted February 22 Posted February 22 10 hours ago, John from Riverside said: The narrative was never that the house killed. The bill left to do their jobs that bill would’ve passed. It has always been about Trump killing that bill so that he could run on it don’t kid yourself. The house killing the bill came from there, being a maga of representatives that have been ***** up everything ever since they’re Republicans to go over the house They take their orders from Trump The real question is if Trump doesn’t win the presidency, then what? A follow up pivot with you. A few weeks back you commented about how CA wasn't experiencing the border issues that Texas and Arizona were. CA has been in the news recently about a lot of it. What say you now?
Doc Posted February 22 Posted February 22 2 hours ago, John from Riverside said: I doubt that you have even read it I doubt you have either. 1
Pokebball Posted February 22 Posted February 22 2 minutes ago, Doc said: I doubt you have either. I've read quite a bit of why folks that voted against it. It would have codified some really bad administrative policies that Biden was allowing. What Biden has been allowing has caused record illegal immigration. Why would congress codify that? 1 1
Doc Posted February 22 Posted February 22 1 hour ago, Pokebball said: I've read quite a bit of why folks that voted against it. It would have codified some really bad administrative policies that Biden was allowing. What Biden has been allowing has caused record illegal immigration. Why would congress codify that? All I needed to hear was almost 5K/day before the President could choose to shut down the border. Sorry, nope. 1
BillStime Posted February 22 Author Posted February 22 35 minutes ago, Doc said: All I needed to hear was almost 5K/day before the President could choose to shut down the border. Sorry, nope. Well, it's just a not a priority for the Party of Putin - it can wait until January according to the cult. Oh well.
John from Riverside Posted February 22 Posted February 22 3 hours ago, Doc said: I doubt you have either. Actually, doc I have went over at line item by line item 3 hours ago, Pokebball said: A follow up pivot with you. A few weeks back you commented about how CA wasn't experiencing the border issues that Texas and Arizona were. CA has been in the news recently about a lot of it. What say you now? California is not complaining lots of jobs to fill
Doc Posted February 22 Posted February 22 Just now, John from Riverside said: Actually, doc I have went over at line item by line item All 370 pages? And again, I pointed-out the part that was a non-starter.
Pokebball Posted February 22 Posted February 22 2 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: California is not complaining lots of jobs to fill Not what the news is reporting.
John from Riverside Posted February 22 Posted February 22 4 hours ago, JDHillFan said: Please tell us that YOU read the 370 page bill - light by government standards. I know you pretended to read the report on Biden’s mishandling of classified information but had no clue about the classification level of the documents involved - despite it being spelled out in the report. The “did you read it” schtick is a bit much coming from someone that struggles to string coherent sentences together. Hal Sparks does a of three hour show where the provisions of the bill were gone over line item by line item 3 minutes ago, Doc said: All 370 pages? And again, I pointed-out the part that was a non-starter. That’s the problem with not reading it do you’re not even right about that The 5000 mark is the number of encounters that’s all encounters on the border does not mean 5000 people were let into the country and the provisions for claiming asylum one of the things that allows people to get in so easily when an encounter happens are totally revised 3 minutes ago, Pokebball said: Not what the news is reporting. We have conservatives in, California, too There is no invasion here 2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: Benhur was actually a great movie Donald Trump would’ve been the court jester
sherpa Posted February 22 Posted February 22 5 hours ago, JDHillFan said: Please tell us that YOU read the 370 page bill - light by government standards. I know you pretended to read the report on Biden’s mishandling of classified information but had no clue about the classification level of the documents involved - despite it being spelled out in the report. The “did you read it” schtick is a bit much coming from someone that struggles to string coherent sentences together. Also claimed that he knows what nuclear war would look like. Nobody knows that. Simply a crazy claim. I was certified to monitor loading them, carry them, and deliver them and I have absolutely no idea what a nuclear exchange would look like, nor does anyone I know with similar knowledge.
Doc Posted February 22 Posted February 22 9 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: That’s the problem with not reading it do you’re not even right about that The 5000 mark is the number of encounters that’s all encounters on the border does not mean 5000 people were let into the country and the provisions for claiming asylum one of the things that allows people to get in so easily when an encounter happens are totally revised Again John, this crisis was created by Joke when he told people prior to the election that we had an open border and when he reversed Trump's policies on Day One. All the cities crying poverty over having to take care of illegals and all the crime they are committing is on him. He can reverse his reversals, one of which is "remain in Mexico" for asylum seekers, therefore no need to revise anything or tie border security to anything else.
Pokebball Posted February 22 Posted February 22 18 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: Hal Sparks does a of three hour show where the provisions of the bill were gone over line item by line item That’s the problem with not reading it do you’re not even right about that The 5000 mark is the number of encounters that’s all encounters on the border does not mean 5000 people were let into the country and the provisions for claiming asylum one of the things that allows people to get in so easily when an encounter happens are totally revised We have conservatives in, California, too There is no invasion here Benhur was actually a great movie Donald Trump would’ve been the court jester News must be wrong then
Doc Posted February 22 Posted February 22 5 hours ago, JDHillFan said: Please tell us that YOU read the 370 page bill - light by government standards. I know you pretended to read the report on Biden’s mishandling of classified information but had no clue about the classification level of the documents involved - despite it being spelled out in the report. They still maintain Joke had no idea he had classified material strewn all over his house and garage.
Recommended Posts