Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Traded 28 to GB for 41 and 58

 

 

41.  Troy Franklin WR Oregon

 

58.  Malachi Corley WR Western Kentucky

 

60.  McKinnley Jackson DT Texas A&M

 

100. Maason Smith DT LSU

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

35.

Troy FranklinWR Oregon

60.

Ben SinnottTE Kansas State

90.

Blake CorumRB Michigan

100.

Maason SmithDT LSU

129.

Cam HartCB Notre Dame

159.

Keith Randolph Jr.DT Illinois

162.

Mohamed KamaraEDGE Colorado State

198.

Trey TaylorS Air Force

202.

Jalyx HuntEDGE Houston Christian

206.

Sione VakiS Utah

246.

Ryan FlournoyWR SE Missouri State

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

28

Byron Murphy

DL | Texas

60

Braden Fiske

DL | Florida State

99

Calen Bullock

S | USC

129

Cade Stover

TE | Ohio State

159

Javon Solomon

EDGE | Troy

162

Luke McCaffrey

WR | Rice

198

Cedric Johnson

EDGE | Mississippi

202

Isaac Guerendo

RB | Louisville

206

Ryan Flournoy

WR | Southeast Missouri State

246

Jaylon Carlies

S | Missouri

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Richard Noggin said:

Wow would many of you HATE this one. Those first two picks are DUDES, though.

 

image.thumb.png.c56719a98e2dea7f8a0b2ef5ffd919cc.png

 

Yeah - this one won't do at all.

 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted

39.

Troy FranklinWR Oregon

60.

McKinnley JacksonDT Texas A&M

70.

Austin BookerEDGE Kansas

100.

Braden FiskeDT Florida State

159.

Tanor BortoliniOC Wisconsin

162.

Trey TaylorS Air Force

198.

Evan WilliamsS Oregon

202.

Mohamed KamaraEDGE Colorado State

206.

Joe MiltonQB Tennessee

246.

Isaac GuerendoRB Louisville

2025 KC 2nd

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, ScorpionZero said:

39.

Troy FranklinWR Oregon

60.

McKinnley JacksonDT Texas A&M

70.

Austin BookerEDGE Kansas

100.

Braden FiskeDT Florida State

159.

Tanor BortoliniOC Wisconsin

162.

Trey TaylorS Air Force

198.

Evan WilliamsS Oregon

202.

Mohamed KamaraEDGE Colorado State

206.

Joe MiltonQB Tennessee

246.

Isaac GuerendoRB Louisville

2025 KC 2nd

 

Who did KC get with our 1st rd pick? 

Posted

28: R1 P28 DL Byron Murphy - Texas

 

60: R2 P28 WR Xavier Legette - South Carolina

 

98: R3 P34 WR Johnny Wilson - FSU

 

128: R4 P28 S Tykee Smith - Georgia

 

161: R5 P25 EDGE Marshawn Kneeland - Western Michigan

 

164: R5 P28 LB Trevin Wallace - Kentucky

 

195: R6 P20 G Joshua Gray - Oregon State

 

199: R6 P24 C Dylan McMahon - NC State

 

203: R6 P28 CB Zy Alexander - LSU

 

247: R7 P28 WR Drake Stoops - Oklahoma

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

🚨🚨Pump the brakes lol on Pro Football Network's simulator🚨🚨

 

Did a little experiment where I did NOT choose a team and just let the entire draft run, and here are Buffalo's picks (they did not trade at all). I don't think the logic of this model is buttoned up, exactly. 2 CBs and 4 Ss, and 2 RBs. Bills gonna play a 3-2-6 or even 2-2-7 defense in 2024, apparently.

 

Kool-Aid McKinstry - CB

Cole Bishop - S

Blake Corum - RB

DeWayne Carter - DT

Demani Richardson - S

Ray Davis - RB

Trey Taylor - S

Jay Stanley - S

Jarvis Brownlee - CB

Khari Coleman - LB

 

  • Shocked 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Richard Noggin said:

🚨🚨Pump the brakes lol on Pro Football Network's simulator🚨🚨

 

Did a little experiment where I did NOT choose a team and just let the entire draft run, and here are Buffalo's picks (they did not trade at all). I don't think the logic of this model is buttoned up, exactly. 2 CBs and 4 Ss, and 2 RBs. Bills gonna play a 3-2-6 or even 2-2-7 defense in 2024, apparently.

 

Kool-Aid McKinstry - CB

Cole Bishop - S

Blake Corum - RB

DeWayne Carter - DT

Demani Richardson - S

Ray Davis - RB

Trey Taylor - S

Jay Stanley - S

Jarvis Brownlee - CB

Khari Coleman - LB

 

 

2nd automated mock I ran resulted in 4 safeties again. Funny stuff.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Success said:

 

Yeah - this one won't do at all.

 

Right. I’d hate this with everything I have 

1 hour ago, Richard Noggin said:

Trading back out of the first is like a cheat code with PFN's simulator. Stupid value all over the place in this mock. Sign me up.

 

image.thumb.png.6fa7d42a2a89885c74f9b1d990c265d5.png

Much better. I don’t like the RB. But everything else is awesome 

1 hour ago, Richard Noggin said:

Really like the prospects chosen in this one, with one trade back out of the 2nd rd. Those b2b LSU DTs are pretty cool.

 

image.thumb.png.3549bccb6dcd24545312daf82bd5e431.png

Like this one even more. What’s with the early rd RBs tho? If they take a 3rd round RB again I’ll rip my tv off the wall. I agree we need a body there but Cook has proven capable and shouldn’t spend the resources on one so early with all the needs we have 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

Buffalo Receives:

2024: Round 1, Pick 31

2024: Round 2, Pick 63

2024: Round 4, Pick 132

San Francisco Receives:

2024: Round 1, Pick 28

Buffalo Receives:

2024: Round 4, Pick 130

2024: Round 5, Pick 166

Minnesota Receives:

2024: Round 4, Pick 129

My Selections

31

Troy Franklin

WR | Oregon

TRADE

60

Braden Fiske

DL | Florida State

63

Calen Bullock

S | USC

TRADE

99

Austin Booker

EDGE | Kansas

130

Tykee Smith

S | Georgia

TRADE

132

Ben Sinnott

TE | Kansas State

TRADE

159

Zion Tupuola-Fetui

EDGE | Washington

162

Andrew Raym

IOL | Oklahoma

166

Jordan Jefferson

DL | LSU

TRADE

198

Isaac Guerendo

RB | Louisville

202

J.D. Bertrand

LB | Notre Dame

206

Dwight McGlothern

CB | Arkansas

246

Anthony Gould

WR | Oregon State

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, mrags said:

Right. I’d hate this with everything I have 

Much better. I don’t like the RB. But everything else is awesome 

Like this one even more. What’s with the early rd RBs tho? If they take a 3rd round RB again I’ll rip my tv off the wall. I agree we need a body there but Cook has proven capable and shouldn’t spend the resources on one so early with all the needs we have 

 

Value was only screaming RB or LB, if I recall. Cook is halfway through his rookie deal already, and isn't the best blocker or short yardage, power back. Love Cook's talent, but there is a need for a complimentary guy who has some traits. And, in the event of injury, another guy who can attack defenses. (That being said, don't love Estime's feet tbh.) The draft is for adding cost-controlled talent on a longer timeline than next season. The Bills currently have NOTHING in the RB pipeline behind Cook. (And yet, I understand how unpopular a 3rd rd RB pick would be.)

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Richard Noggin said:

 

Value was only screaming RB or LB, if I recall. Cook is halfway through his rookie deal already, and isn't the best blocker or short yardage, power back. Love Cook's talent, but there is a need for a complimentary guy who has some traits. And, in the event of injury, another guy who can attack defenses. (That being said, don't love Estime's feet tbh.) The draft is for adding cost-controlled talent on a longer timeline than next season. The Bills currently have NOTHING in the RB pipeline behind Cook. (And yet, I understand how unpopular a 3rd rd RB pick would be.)

I understand all of that. Except you are almost hoping you can get someone that plays significant time with the 3rd pick. At least this year with our holes and needs. Could take a RB in rd 5 or after to come in and do what you’re hoping. JMO

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, mrags said:

I understand all of that. Except you are almost hoping you can get someone that plays significant time with the 3rd pick. At least this year with our holes and needs. Could take a RB in rd 5 or after to come in and do what you’re hoping. JMO

 

While that is true the 3rd round is also  a place where you still don't reach down a tier to take a position you need. Obviously for this exercise we are all using the simulator's draftboard as if it were our own so to play that out in round one I never reach beyond the top 5 players on their board. Round 2 not beyond the top 8 and rounds 3 and 4 not beyond the top 10. After that I give myself a little more leeway because that is realistic. Once you get to rounds 5 through 7 teams are looking at their rosters and saying "where might these guys have the best chance to stick." But earlier reaching through tiers is a no-no. So you have to either take trades and move back, trade UP or sometimes take a position that isn't necessarily a need. 

 

I say all that as someone who also does not want yet ANOTHER day 2 pick on a running back. When you have an established starter at the spot that should be a no-no too. 

 

I normally try and do a 4 round mock in the final day or two of the run up where I use the simulator but use my own board and mark guys off in the background as it goes. 

Edited by GunnerBill
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
25 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

While that is true the 3rd round is also  a place where you still don't reach down a tier to take a position you need. Obviously for this exercise we are all using the simulator's draftboard as if it were our own so to play that out in round one I never reach beyond the top 5 players on their board. Round 2 not beyond the top 8 and rounds 3 and 4 not beyond the top 10. After that I give myself a little more leeway because that is realistic. Once you get to rounds 5 through 7 teams are looking at their rosters and saying "where might these guys have the best chance to stick." But earlier reaching through tiers is a no-no. So you have to either take trades and move back, trade UP or sometimes take a position that isn't necessarily a need. 

 

I say all that as someone who also does not want yet ANOTHER day 2 pick on a running back. When you have an established starter at the spot that should be a no-no too. 

 

I normally try and do a 4 round mock in the final day or two of the run up where I use the simulator but use my own board and mark guys off in the background as it goes. 

I like the idea of picking players not outside the top available at the time. I don’t go by that generally because for example, if a QB is there we aren’t taking one. And while I do see the point of it as taking the best football players available at the time I also have an issue with it if you already have someone at that position, OR if it’s a position that can generally be found later in the draft. RBs are a dime a dozen and have short shelf life’s. I get the idea of continuing to draft one. Hell, almost all my mocks have Jawhar Jordan in them. I love the kid. But I also wouldn’t reach earlier than rd5 to do it. It’s not that I don’t think a certain player may not be good enough, it’s the holes and needs we have vs the resources to get them all. 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...