Mr. WEO Posted January 29 Posted January 29 Why would Brady have to take Andrews out to dinner? Couldn't he send room service and watch her through the peephole? 3 1 Quote
Doc Brown Posted January 29 Posted January 29 Could go either way with Brady. If he’s locked in like he was in the NFL then he could be really good. 1 Quote
Bob Jones Posted January 29 Posted January 29 Just mind boggling that these companies have so much money to unnecessarily blow. Absolutely no one tunes in to an NFL game solely because of who is calling the game. People tune in because: it's their team, they're friends & family of a player/coach, it's a good matchup between good teams, or it's the playoffs/SB. I just don't understand. Anybody have an explanation? Will people who would otherwise not watch a crappy game between two crappy teams tune in just because Brady is calling it? 1 2 Quote
stinky finger Posted January 29 Posted January 29 Let’s get someone to roll up on Romo and replace his sorry ass with Olsen. 1 1 Quote
KingBoots8 Posted January 29 Posted January 29 Ugh, we are gonna hear about “Tom Brady’s record vs the Bills” a few times next season, aren’t we? We just got rid of the dude, now Kermit takes his place on the field and Brady is gonna narrate our games. Fantastic. 1 Quote
Gugny Posted January 29 Posted January 29 I like Olsen. But I’m looking forward to seeing/hearing what Brady has to offer. 2 Quote
chongli Posted January 29 Author Posted January 29 (edited) 55 minutes ago, Bob Jones said: Just mind boggling that these companies have so much money to unnecessarily blow. Absolutely no one tunes in to an NFL game solely because of who is calling the game. People tune in because: it's their team, they're friends & family of a player/coach, it's a good matchup between good teams, or it's the playoffs/SB. I just don't understand. Anybody have an explanation? Will people who would otherwise not watch a crappy game between two crappy teams tune in just because Brady is calling it? Well, the thing is, Brady will not be assigned to a crappy game. He will almost be on the top game of the week. And from the article: "With the NFL dominating entertainment, networks are now partly defined by their football coverage. No. 1 NFL analysts command the mega-salaries that used to flow to network news anchors like Tom Brokaw and Dan Rather.". The NFL is an experience, and the networks want to put their best product out with the best game. And Greg Olsen's salary next year will go down to just $3 million for the B-team, hardly top dollar in the grand scheme of things. Also, the name recognition helps generate brand value. Exhibit A: Taylor Swift: Edited January 29 by chongli Quote
BRH Posted January 29 Posted January 29 Whenever I've heard Brady speak post-retirement he's come off as trying too hard to be cool and funny. He's neither, really. 2 Quote
Bob Jones Posted January 29 Posted January 29 26 minutes ago, stinky finger said: Let’s get someone to roll up on Romo and replace his sorry ass with Olsen. I want you to watch….that not happen. 😂 1 Quote
Doc Brown Posted January 29 Posted January 29 34 minutes ago, Bob Jones said: Just mind boggling that these companies have so much money to unnecessarily blow. Absolutely no one tunes in to an NFL game solely because of who is calling the game. People tune in because: it's their team, they're friends & family of a player/coach, it's a good matchup between good teams, or it's the playoffs/SB. I just don't understand. Anybody have an explanation? Will people who would otherwise not watch a crappy game between two crappy teams tune in just because Brady is calling it? Quality of the viewing experience will impact a person's opinion of the network that bleeds into them watching other shows on that network. It will also keep some fans tuned in if the game is a blowout if they're able to keep the viewer engaged. That's the only explanation I've heard and I'm not even sure if that's accurate. 2 Quote
BigAl2526 Posted January 29 Posted January 29 (edited) I really have a hard time thinking Brady feels the need for more money. There can't be a lot of things that he would want that he can't buy already short of a super yacht ore a country. I'm guessing he just enjoys football enough that he wants to stay close to it. Being a high priced network color commentator carries an advantage over a coaching position in that you avoid the grind and the stress. Edited January 30 by BigAl2526 1 Quote
Spiderweb Posted January 29 Posted January 29 I generally like Olsen, however he often keeps talking long after he should stop. A pet peeve of mine with him and Romo is that they too often keep babbling after a play has begun. They need to learn to take a note from Aikman (less if often more). 1 Quote
BCAS Baritone Posted January 29 Posted January 29 2 hours ago, chongli said: Greg Olsen of FOX's A-team called his last game yesterday as FOX's lead analyst. He will be demoted next year to the B-team to be paired by Joe Davis most likely. He will take a 70% pay cut from $10 million to just $3 million (I know: first-world problems). Tom Brady has been groomed to take his place. Under his 10-year contract, he will make $375 million ($37.5 million a year), which is more than his lifetime NFL salary of $333 million. He will join the A-team of Kevin Burkhardt, Erin Andrews, and Tom Rinaldi. https://frontofficesports.com/five-burning-questions-foxs-tom-brady-greg-olsen-dilemma/ The lead analysts opening for a network is rare, once in a generation. From the article: "Troy Aikman of ESPN and Cris Collinsworth of NBC Sports, for example, have served as No. 1 color commentators for 22 straight seasons. Super Bowl LVIII analyst Tony Romo is wrapping his seventh season at CBS Sports. His predecessor, Phil Simms, held the job for 19 years.". The sad part is Olsen, by all accounts, has been outstanding at his job: "Olsen has been a revelation in his three seasons on the air. He’s become a fan favorite on social media—with some calling for Fox to keep him in the top job, Brady or no Brady. In his first season as lead analyst, Olsen called the NFL’s most-watched Super Bowl and regular-season game of all time, winning the Emmy Award for “Outstanding Personality—Emerging On-Air Talent.”" The article said Olsen was taking it all in stride and respects the GOAT. Tom Brady has also been working hard preparing for his new role, asking Troy Aikman, Joe Buck, and New England play-by-play announcer Sott Zolak for help. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/episode-120-guest-co-host-joe-buck-on-al-michaels-tom/id1587364692?i=1000640409178 https://awfulannouncing.com/fox/tom-brady-turns-former-patriots-quarterback-for-broadcasting-advice.html Brady was also potted at a dinner with Erin Andrews in November, preparing for his new gig: https://www.tmz.com/2023/11/14/tom-brady-dinner-erin-andrews-beverly-hills-restaurant-fox/ I am so grateful that most AFC games are on CBS 1 Quote
947 Posted January 29 Posted January 29 Brady is only slightly more charismatic than Belichick, not exactly somebody made for this job. Plus, I'd have to guess roughly 50% America dislikes him too. There is little chance he excels at this. I can't comprehend how he'd get $375M to call games for 10 years without ever having done it before. 1 2 Quote
BRH Posted January 29 Posted January 29 You guys think this is bad, though, just wait until Kermit gets that gig. 1 Quote
ControllerOfPlanetX Posted January 29 Posted January 29 Well, I at least have two options: 1 - Mute 2 - Volume = 0 (because fans tune into the games for the announcers…) 1 Quote
Billsatlastin2018 Posted January 29 Posted January 29 3 hours ago, chongli said: Brady was also potted at a dinner with Erin Andrews in November Hmmmm. 1 Quote
UKBillFan Posted January 29 Posted January 29 I don't get why they don't put Brady on a lower team and allow him to grow into the role, rather than throw him into the A Team straight away. 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.