HomeskillitMoorman Posted January 30 Posted January 30 5 minutes ago, LeviF said: Who’s upset? Whoever chooses to become an evolutionary dead end is welcome to do so. But their opinions should not be taken at all seriously. If you have no stake in the future of the country you should have no say in the future of the country. I don't think it's possible to be more narrow-minded than this. First off, someone in their 30's could have 50-70 more years left on this planet. They could also have nephews, nieces, have students they've taught, children of friends, or even just flat out care about the next generation of people. What about people that are "evolutionary dead-end"'s that can't have children? What about people whose children have passed away or have children that don't want children? All of these people should be left without an opinion or say? And parents that are deadbeats or even just bad at what they do, using your logic, should? I'm in the middle politically because I don't like either party but it's nonsense like this that reminds of me why I could never be a Conservative. 1
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted January 30 Posted January 30 1 minute ago, Unforgiven said: F billstime Something everyone can agree on at long last. Common ground to bridge the divide! 2
Pokebball Posted January 30 Posted January 30 21 minutes ago, HomeskillitMoorman said: I don't think it's possible to be more narrow-minded than this. First off, someone in their 30's could have 50-70 more years left on this planet. They could also have nephews, nieces, have students they've taught, children of friends, or even just flat out care about the next generation of people. What about people that are "evolutionary dead-end"'s that can't have children? What about people whose children have passed away or have children that don't want children? All of these people should be left without an opinion or say? And parents that are deadbeats or even just bad at what they do, using your logic, should? I'm in the middle politically because I don't like either party but it's nonsense like this that reminds of me why I could never be a Conservative. I don't care for Taylor Swift, never have. Now I feel you Dems are saying I have to care for her? I really don't get it. 1
HomeskillitMoorman Posted January 30 Posted January 30 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Pokebball said: I don't care for Taylor Swift, never have. Now I feel you Dems are saying I have to care for her? I really don't get it. When did I say that? I literally made a post about how Celebrity endorsements don't impact elections at all and that nobody needs to care about Taylor Swift. The post I made that you're replying to was in response to someone who said people who don't have kids should have no say in the future of the country. Edited January 30 by HomeskillitMoorman
Pokebball Posted January 30 Posted January 30 10 minutes ago, HomeskillitMoorman said: When did I say that? I literally made a post about how Celebrity endorsements don't impact elections at all and that nobody needs to care about Taylor Swift. The post I made that you're replying to was in response to someone who said people who don't have kids should have no say in the future of the country. Sure felt like you were speaking to conservatives as opposed to one poster. Thanks for clarifying.
Roundybout Posted January 30 Posted January 30 2 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: I don't get Trump's problem. He's got Kanye on his side. Doesn't that even things out? Hey man, he’s got Kid Rock too 1
Westside Posted January 31 Posted January 31 8 hours ago, Tiberius said: Stolen, right? And Biden is way lesser of the two evils A good president in fact, as opposed to the garbage president Trump So you condon *****? Not very surprised to be honest.
The Frankish Reich Posted January 31 Posted January 31 1 hour ago, LeviF said: Who’s upset? Whoever chooses to become an evolutionary dead end is welcome to do so. But their opinions should not be taken at all seriously. If you have no stake in the future of the country you should have no say in the future of the country. Maybe we should give Mormons some extra votes since they tend to have a lot of kids? Or how about counting the votes of the childless by some fractional amount. 3/5 maybe?
Big Blitz Posted January 31 Posted January 31 Facts. But, this is still a sham relationship. Because they know it’s an admission of how stupid they are and that their positions are all a disaster. Can’t relate with ideas you need judges to cement into law. So turn to popular culture. Which isn’t popular. And isn’t culture.
Roundybout Posted January 31 Posted January 31 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Facts. But, this is still a sham relationship. Because they know it’s an admission of how stupid they are and that their positions are all a disaster. Can’t relate with ideas you need judges to cement into law. So turn to popular culture. Which isn’t popular. And isn’t culture. You people are obsessed with raving nonsense. Any psychologist would write you a prescription for a rope after seeing these things you post “it’s a government psyop!!!” Screech people exposed repeatedly to agent orange Edited January 31 by Roundybout 1 1
Big Blitz Posted January 31 Posted January 31 5 minutes ago, Roundybout said: You people are obsessed with raving nonsense. Any psychologist would write you a prescription for a rope after seeing these things you post “it’s a government psyop!!!” Screech people exposed repeatedly to agent orange Do you believe their relationship is organic?
Roundybout Posted January 31 Posted January 31 Just now, Big Blitz said: Do you believe their relationship is organic? Let’s see, is it two famous people having a fling, or is it a NATO-orchestrated/Soros-funded psyop to put subliminal messages in peoples minds to vote democrat? GEE WHIZ
Big Blitz Posted January 31 Posted January 31 5 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Let’s see, is it two famous people having a fling, or is it a NATO-orchestrated/Soros-funded psyop to put subliminal messages in peoples minds to vote democrat? GEE WHIZ That wasn’t the question. Just a simple yes or no. Travis Kelce met Taylor Swift somehow and they hooked up. Natural. Yes or no.
BillStime Posted January 31 Posted January 31 4 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: That wasn’t the question. Just a simple yes or no. Travis Kelce met Taylor Swift somehow and they hooked up. Natural. Yes or no. lmao - you need help
ChiGoose Posted January 31 Posted January 31 I don’t understand why this is a political issue or why people care so much. The culture war is dumb. 1
Capco Posted January 31 Posted January 31 (edited) EDIT: On second thought, I can't actually figure out wtf is happening above so I'll withhold my sarcasm for later. But to wit, it's a bit far fetched to think Kelce and Tay-Tay's relationship is a government psychological operation. Surely anyone with common sense realizes that's Tinfoil Hat Territory. Edited January 31 by Capco 1
Roundybout Posted January 31 Posted January 31 14 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: That wasn’t the question. Just a simple yes or no. Travis Kelce met Taylor Swift somehow and they hooked up. Natural. Yes or no. Sure. No different from Josh and Hailee Steinfeld, or Brady and Giselle, or David Nelson and that one Cowboys cheerleader 8 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: I don’t understand why this is a political issue or why people care so much. The culture war is dumb. You can tell these nerds haven’t watched a single game in their lives. These are the guys that got dumped in lockers as kids 1
John from Riverside Posted January 31 Posted January 31 3 hours ago, LeviF said: Who’s upset? Whoever chooses to become an evolutionary dead end is welcome to do so. But their opinions should not be taken at all seriously. If you have no stake in the future of the country you should have no say in the future of the country. Could you explain a little bit more of this evolutionary dead end? 1
Recommended Posts