K D Posted September 11 Posted September 11 1 minute ago, ChiGoose said: Cool story Then they won the state title in football with Taylor drawing up the plays 1
ChiGoose Posted September 11 Posted September 11 Just now, K D said: Then they won the state title in football with Taylor drawing up the plays Copium
K D Posted September 11 Posted September 11 1 minute ago, ChiGoose said: Copium https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/01/sport/patrick-mahomes-taylor-swift-kansas-city-chiefs-spt-intl/index.html 1
OrangeBills Posted September 11 Posted September 11 3 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said: Kamala talked about policy’s to help with that like a $6,000 tax credit for new borns and has plans to make housing more affordable. Trump didn’t have any. 2.4 million likes on 35 mins….. last election was decided by 50,000 votes. Ridiculous This is what failing governments do...problem whack-a-mole once you've created huge problems - in this case having children is too expensive - and just print money and give it to people Ridiculous Yes, I agree there are legions of stupid people in the country, doesn't mean it's good. 1
The Frankish Reich Posted September 11 Posted September 11 No one will ever accuse Taylor Swift of being bad at PR. And there's no doubt she timed this release for maximum impact. Kamala surge coming. I don't know it it'll last, but it's coming. 4 1 1
ChiGoose Posted September 11 Posted September 11 10 minutes ago, K D said: https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/01/sport/patrick-mahomes-taylor-swift-kansas-city-chiefs-spt-intl/index.html Cope harder
L Ron Burgundy Posted September 11 Posted September 11 2 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: No one will ever accuse Taylor Swift of being bad at PR. And there's no doubt she timed this release for maximum impact. Kamala surge coming. I don't know it it'll last, but it's coming. And if the orange abortion continues his consistent insanity she may even make a plea to her fans. Sounds dumb but Swifties are crazy for her. It would have an impact. 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted September 11 Posted September 11 🎯 F Taylor Swift and every other sick twisted monster who supports the trans cult and mutilating kids. 2
SydneyBillsFan Posted September 11 Posted September 11 (edited) 6 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: No one will ever accuse Taylor Swift of being bad at PR. And there's no doubt she timed this release for maximum impact. Kamala surge coming. I don't know it it'll last, but it's coming. Except it won't have anything like maximum impact. Because Swift specialises in entertainment PR - not political PR. And her timing was off. Issuing a statement two or three days after the debate would have made it a standalone news item. This was issued late on a Tuesday night when most people went to sleep. When they wake up on Wednesday morning, the core issue will be the debate itself, which will be sub-divided into dozens of separate talking points - of which Taylor's official statement of support (aimed at mostly pre-pubescent, female teeny boppers, many of whom will be under voting age) will be as watered down and bland as her politics. Sorry to disappoint you. Edited September 11 by SydneyBillsFan Reality check for deluded liberals 2
Roundybout Posted September 11 Posted September 11 34 minutes ago, SydneyBillsFan said: Except it won't have anything like maximum impact. Because Swift specialises in entertainment PR - not political PR. And her timing was off. Issuing a statement two or three days after the debate would have made it a standalone news item. This was issued late on a Tuesday night when most people went to sleep. When they wake up on Wednesday morning, the core issue will be the debate itself, which will be sub-divided into dozens of separate talking points - of which Taylor's official statement of support (aimed at mostly pre-pubescent, female teeny boppers, many of whom will be under voting age) will be as watered down and bland as her politics. Sorry to disappoint you. I hate to disappoint you but Swift’s fan club was “prepubescent teeny boppers” about 15 years ago. They’ve grown up with her. 1 1
Backintheday544 Posted September 11 Posted September 11 1 hour ago, SydneyBillsFan said: Except it won't have anything like maximum impact. Because Swift specialises in entertainment PR - not political PR. And her timing was off. Issuing a statement two or three days after the debate would have made it a standalone news item. This was issued late on a Tuesday night when most people went to sleep. When they wake up on Wednesday morning, the core issue will be the debate itself, which will be sub-divided into dozens of separate talking points - of which Taylor's official statement of support (aimed at mostly pre-pubescent, female teeny boppers, many of whom will be under voting age) will be as watered down and bland as her politics. Sorry to disappoint you. Teeny boppers are all in Chappell Roan now. They can’t afford the $2,000 tickets to Taylor Swift. Perfect time to endorse. Gives the Swifties time to get people registered. Spread the good word. Donate. Donate time. Trump’s about to turn into Jude Bellingham.
BillsFanNC Posted September 11 Posted September 11 Imagine being successfully psyop'd by Taylor friggin Swift. 1
Tommy Callahan Posted September 11 Posted September 11 (edited) OMG a billionaire that got that way by marketing/targeting kids, is supporting the corporate candidate. But it is good that Interpol caught those terrorists before they attacked her concert. they were planning deaths in the thousands. Edited September 11 by Tommy Callahan
Backintheday544 Posted September 11 Posted September 11 Taylor has 283,000,000 followers. The last election was as close as 50,000 votes. If her endorsement gets half a percent of her followers to either vote that weren’t going to or change their vote, that’s 1,415,000 votes. Half a percent. 0.5%. Taylor has more of a cult of personality than Trumps MAGAs. 1
Gregg Posted September 11 Posted September 11 3 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said: Taylor has 283,000,000 followers. The last election was as close as 50,000 votes. If her endorsement gets half a percent of her followers to either vote that weren’t going to or change their vote, that’s 1,415,000 votes. Half a percent. 0.5%. Taylor has more of a cult of personality than Trumps MAGAs. Most of her followers are 13 years old or younger. 1 1
Backintheday544 Posted September 11 Posted September 11 7 minutes ago, Gregg said: Most of her followers are 13 years old or younger. lol sorry no, especially since she debuted in like 2003 https://www.forbes.com/sites/marisadellatto/2023/03/14/more-than-half-of-us-adults-say-theyre-taylor-swift-fans-survey-finds/# Some 45% of avid fans are millennials, people between the ages of 27 and 42, while 23% are baby boomers, 21% are Gen Xers and just 11% are members of Gen Z—those 26 and under. 1 1
Tommy Callahan Posted September 11 Posted September 11 8 hours ago, Backintheday544 said: Kamala talked about policy’s to help with that like a $6,000 tax credit for new borns and has plans to make housing more affordable. Trump didn’t have any. you know Vance first floated the tax credit, for all kids. them K Harris claimed it, but only for new Bornes. what you want to be it would be offset with smaller credits for children older than 1. Both have claimed to have the federal government override state and local building codes to make cheap houses.
The Frankish Reich Posted September 11 Posted September 11 2 hours ago, Roundybout said: I hate to disappoint you but Swift’s fan club was “prepubescent teeny boppers” about 15 years ago. They’ve grown up with her. This is true. I speak as someone who's watched my daughter and her childhood friends do exactly this.
Recommended Posts