Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I'd say he is a smoother mover than Gabe as well.

 

I think Legette will run faster than 4.5 but his 20 split will be of interest. Because I agree he is fast but isn't sudden and has to get into his stride to really see the speed.

I think it might be Legette or Franklin or bust (pick a different position) for Bills in round 1.  (I don’t think Thomas Jr will be available and I would not trade up).

Edited by OldTimer1960
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, OldTimer1960 said:

I think it might be Legette or Franklin or bust for Bills in round 1.  (I don’t think Thomas Jr will be available and I would not trade up).

Perhaps Beane will be higher on Legette than everyone else, but I don't think any of the reputable mock draft people have had him in the first round in awhile now. Seems like he's settled in as a mid-2nd/3rd rounder for everyone.

 

Based on the consensus, it feels like Thomas will be off the board, but guys like Coleman, Franklin, Mitchell, etc. are likely to be available. Obviously all subject to change though; once we get to the Combine and draft interviews and stuff, people will start rising and falling a lot I'm sure.

Posted
2 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

Agree Keon doesn't separate. I am all over the map on him. When he is good he is very, very, good. You watch the Clemson film, the LSU film, the Michigan game from last year and you are like "slam dunk 1st round player, possible top 10." And then you watch the Florida game or the Boston College game or Ohio State from last year and you'd struggle to give him a day 2 grade. I have moved him up and down my board more than any player in this class so far. I am settling on he isn't a 1st round grade but he might be upper second. I have stopped watching him now. I will come back in the last week or so before the draft when I have taken some distance. 

 

I like Coleman because he fits what the Bills need. We need a WR that can win against man coverage outside.

 

Defenses ran man against us more than any other team because they knew they could get away with it against our WRs. As a result we were forced to throw passes to our TEs and RBs against man almost half the time, which is not a recipe for explosive offense.

 

Insert Keon Coleman... He has traits to physically dominate man coverage. I get that he isn't a great separator, but being able to physically box out his man and win at the catch point can be equally valuable. Also he could be an elite red zone target.

 

Positional value, physical upside, adds traits that we don't already have. That's what I'm looking for. For me it is Franklin and Coleman as the only two realistically available players that check all those boxes.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

I like Coleman because he fits what the Bills need. We need a WR that can win against man coverage outside.

 

Defenses ran man against us more than any other team because they knew they could get away with it against our WRs. As a result we were forced to throw passes to our TEs and RBs against man almost half the time, which is not a recipe for explosive offense.

 

Insert Keon Coleman... He has traits to physically dominate man coverage. I get that he isn't a great separator, but being able to physically box out his man and win at the catch point can be equally valuable. Also he could be an elite red zone target.

 

Positional value, physical upside, adds traits that we don't already have. That's what I'm looking for. For me it is Franklin and Coleman as the only two realistically available players that check all those boxes.

 

Yea I don't know that I think he does dominate against man. Or at least not consistently enough. I think the Bills need a separator personally and while Coleman has a skill set it isn't that. I like him somewhere where they already had that quick separator type. I think he'd be a good fit with say Olave or Wilson opposite him for the Saints or Jets. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, LabattBlue said:

Franklin has legs that look like they could be snapped like a twig. 

So did Devontae smith and he’s just fine 

4 hours ago, JerseyBills said:

I'm really warming up to this kid.. He could learn alot from Diggs too but looks like he could be WR1b to Diggs. 

 

If they go WR in rd 1 , I expect a WR1 not a WR2. Maybe not year 1 but certainly year 2, otherwise address other needs


I’ve seen him listed at 6-3. Those stats used to be inflated but it’s harder to get away with now. Maybe he’s rounded up a bit but not 3 inches lol

Posted
52 minutes ago, DCOrange said:

Perhaps Beane will be higher on Legette than everyone else, but I don't think any of the reputable mock draft people have had him in the first round in awhile now. Seems like he's settled in as a mid-2nd/3rd rounder for everyone.

 

Based on the consensus, it feels like Thomas will be off the board, but guys like Coleman, Franklin, Mitchell, etc. are likely to be available. Obviously all subject to change though; once we get to the Combine and draft interviews and stuff, people will start rising and falling a lot I'm sure.

Late in round 1, if they are likely looking at “early-mid 2nd talent” no matter what position they take.  They need to find someone who can develop further (like Rousseau has).  There are a fair number of wr in this draft who could help the Bills, but most still have limitations or require development.  Only a few, though, fit the description of outside receiver with size who can also stretch the field.

Posted
47 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

I like Coleman because he fits what the Bills need. We need a WR that can win against man coverage outside.

 

Defenses ran man against us more than any other team because they knew they could get away with it against our WRs. As a result we were forced to throw passes to our TEs and RBs against man almost half the time, which is not a recipe for explosive offense.

 

Insert Keon Coleman... He has traits to physically dominate man coverage. I get that he isn't a great separator, but being able to physically box out his man and win at the catch point can be equally valuable. Also he could be an elite red zone target.

 

Positional value, physical upside, adds traits that we don't already have. That's what I'm looking for. For me it is Franklin and Coleman as the only two realistically available players that check all those boxes.


I’m in 100% agreement we need players who can beat man and press coverage quickly. Even in the years teams played less man against us in-season, we would get to the playoffs and the corners would be physical with Diggs and co and it disrupted things.

 

Coleman is the second youngest receiver in the draft behind Nabers I believe and so he is still pretty raw. Those amazing one handed stabs he makes are from his time as a basketball player but he does it a little too frequently right now. Good coaching could make him a dominant player because his physical traits are awesome. I’d be happy with him at 28.

 

The guy I am very high on and like him better than Coleman right now (Coleman has more tools to develop into a more dominant receiver), is Brenden Rice. I don’t know why teams tried to press him as much as they did because he crushed them for it so often. Also Caleb Williams ran scramble drills so frequently Rice became very good at making himself available during the offscript throws where Josh is already so dangerous. I think he is the THE perfect fit for the Bills. 
 

In the end though, we just need to bring in a lot of young receivers to improve the overall talent level of the WR room like Green Bay did. As long as we draft a receiver early and a few more on day 2 and 3 this draft I will be happy 

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

 

I like Coleman because he fits what the Bills need. We need a WR that can win against man coverage outside.

 

Defenses ran man against us more than any other team because they knew they could get away with it against our WRs. As a result we were forced to throw passes to our TEs and RBs against man almost half the time, which is not a recipe for explosive offense.

 

Insert Keon Coleman... He has traits to physically dominate man coverage. I get that he isn't a great separator, but being able to physically box out his man and win at the catch point can be equally valuable. Also he could be an elite red zone target.

 

Positional value, physical upside, adds traits that we don't already have. That's what I'm looking for. For me it is Franklin and Coleman as the only two realistically available players that check all those boxes.


We just dealt with this with Gabe. A large box out type WR that struggles to separate 
 

We don’t need that and i want nothing to do with Coleman as a result 

 

We need an elite separation type guy and someone to threaten with deep speed. It will open up the middle of the field so much for Josh. 
 

Last year our O was compressed, the D could shrink the field and safeties never really had to worry about being beat deep. 
 

Imo

Edited by DJB
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
2 hours ago, OldTimer1960 said:

Franklin’s strength work at the combine is going to be pretty important.  He looks like just what the Bills need, except he is very light for his height.  
 

I can see Legette’s speed on game tape, but I’m guessing he will run about 4.5 at the combine.  Not sure he has the instant acceleration to kill the 40.  That doesn’t concern me much, though.

I think he runs a 4.5 he's gonna be a late 2nd or 3rd round pick

Posted
43 minutes ago, LEBills said:


I’m in 100% agreement we need players who can beat man and press coverage quickly. Even in the years teams played less man against us in-season, we would get to the playoffs and the corners would be physical with Diggs and co and it disrupted things.

 

Coleman is the second youngest receiver in the draft behind Nabers I believe and so he is still pretty raw. Those amazing one handed stabs he makes are from his time as a basketball player but he does it a little too frequently right now. Good coaching could make him a dominant player because his physical traits are awesome. I’d be happy with him at 28.

 

The guy I am very high on and like him better than Coleman right now (Coleman has more tools to develop into a more dominant receiver), is Brenden Rice. I don’t know why teams tried to press him as much as they did because he crushed them for it so often. Also Caleb Williams ran scramble drills so frequently Rice became very good at making himself available during the offscript throws where Josh is already so dangerous. I think he is the THE perfect fit for the Bills. 
 

In the end though, we just need to bring in a lot of young receivers to improve the overall talent level of the WR room like Green Bay did. As long as we draft a receiver early and a few more on day 2 and 3 this draft I will be happy 

Coleman might end up being a great Wr but not with the Bills. He just doesn't fit the profile of the type of Wr that Allen flourishes with. Allen needs separators look at 2020 his best season we had Brown, Beasley & Diggs and Allen dominated. Allen struggles a little with Anticipation so big box out guys don't fit that play style. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 3
Posted
15 minutes ago, Donuts and Doritos said:

 

The WR draft breakdown is in the second half of the interview.

 

Spends a lot of time talking about the enigma of Coleman, and then an intriguing bit about McConkey at the end.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, NastyNateSoldiers said:

Allen struggles a little with Anticipation so big box out guys don't fit that play style. 

 

I don't agree with this. Allen likes picking a matchup against man and throwing the ball there. If Coleman has a good matchup and Allen trusts him to win at the catch point he will get the ball. This year Diggs was always the matchup Allen chose in those situations and unfortunately Diggs fell off big time down the stretch. We need someone that can take over that role.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

I don't agree with this. Allen likes picking a matchup against man and throwing the ball there. If Coleman has a good matchup and Allen trusts him to win at the catch point he will get the ball. This year Diggs was always the matchup Allen chose in those situations and unfortunately Diggs fell off big time down the stretch. We need someone that can take over that role.

It didn't work with Diggs u think it's gonna work with Coleman? It didn't work with Diggs because it's not Allen game

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, DJB said:


We just dealt with this with Gabe. A large box out type WR that struggles to separate 
 

We don’t need that and i want nothing to do with Coleman as a result 

 

We need an elite separation type guy and someone to threaten with deep speed. It will open up the middle of the field so much for Josh. 
 

Last year our O was compressed, the D could shrink the field and safeties never really had to worry about being beat deep. 
 

Imo

I don't really agree with the Coleman/Gabe comparison personally. I never felt that boxing out and high pointing the ball were strengths of Davis'. He just did a good job attacking the seams in the defense and Allen would lead him away from the coverage. I also don't think pure speed is really necessary to be a field stretcher which is why guys like Coleman and Mitchell are two of the better vertical threats in the draft. Coleman is good at stacking his man and once he's done that, he'll be at a distinct advantage down the field unless you give him safety help. And crucially in comparison to Gabe, he should be much more of a threat in the short/intermediate game as well due to his frame and body control. And while Coleman is not the best route runner, Gabe basically couldn't run routes outside of the vertical stuff; watching him try to run a simple curl route was depressing.

 

At any rate, separation would be preferred but I think we simply need guys that we're confident can win on the outside, particularly while dealing with press coverage, which is why I've landed on Thomas, Franklin, and Coleman as the three that I would target (assuming no massive trade up). Thomas is a master against press coverage and has enough speed to pull away from DBs. I'm confident he'll demand safety help on the outside. Franklin isn't as dominant against press coverage or as dynamic a deep threat, but he has some real shake to his releases/routes that should allow him to get separation on slants, curls, etc. while still being a threat vertically. Coleman doesn't really create separation super well, but there's flashes of it when he's able to lean into the DB with his strength and then make his cut and his ability to box out and high point the ball allows him to separate at the catching point rather than in the route itself.

 

For me, I'd prefer Thomas or Franklin, but Coleman has separated himself as the #3 realistic target at 28.

 

I think if we're purely focused on quick separators against man coverage, you may have to be more open to the idea of getting someone that can win in the slot quicker than Shakir does. That hasn't been Shakir's game to this point in his career and the slot is probably the easiest place to get quick separation against man coverage.

Edited by DCOrange
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
46 minutes ago, DCOrange said:

I don't really agree with the Coleman/Gabe comparison personally. I never felt that boxing out and high pointing the ball were strengths of Davis'. He just did a good job attacking the seams in the defense and Allen would lead him away from the coverage. I also don't think pure speed is really necessary to be a field stretcher which is why guys like Coleman and Mitchell are two of the better vertical threats in the draft. Coleman is good at stacking his man and once he's done that, he'll be at a distinct advantage down the field unless you give him safety help. And crucially in comparison to Gabe, he should be much more of a threat in the short/intermediate game as well due to his frame and body control. And while Coleman is not the best route runner, Gabe basically couldn't run routes outside of the vertical stuff; watching him try to run a simple curl route was depressing.

 

At any rate, separation would be preferred but I think we simply need guys that we're confident can win on the outside, particularly while dealing with press coverage, which is why I've landed on Thomas, Franklin, and Coleman as the three that I would target (assuming no massive trade up). Thomas is a master against press coverage and has enough speed to pull away from DBs. I'm confident he'll demand safety help on the outside. Franklin isn't as dominant against press coverage or as dynamic a deep threat, but he has some real shake to his releases/routes that should allow him to get separation on slants, curls, etc. while still being a threat vertically. Coleman doesn't really create separation super well, but there's flashes of it when he's able to lean into the DB with his strength and then make his cut and his ability to box out and high point the ball allows him to separate at the catching point rather than in the route itself.

 

For me, I'd prefer Thomas or Franklin, but Coleman has separated himself as the #3 realistic target at 28.

 

I think if we're purely focused on quick separators against man coverage, you may have to be more open to the idea of getting someone that can win in the slot quicker than Shakir does. That hasn't been Shakir's game to this point in his career and the slot is probably the easiest place to get quick separation against man coverage.


Im in the same boat mindset that it’s most likely to be one of Franklin or Thomas for us. 

Posted
44 minutes ago, NastyNateSoldiers said:

It didn't work with Diggs u think it's gonna work with Coleman? It didn't work with Diggs because it's not Allen game

 

It didn't work with Diggs because at the end there he couldn't separate and he couldn't make contested catches. Coleman is an alpha at the catch point. More nuance in his route running than people give him credit for too IMO. He has traits that in theory would make him dominant against man at the next level. Obviously it remains to be seen if those traits actually translate and develop.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...