Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, EmotionallyUnstable said:


Great history and info here. You can read into this so many ways. My initial reaction is that this move was a decade ago. The game has changed and WR is now a flooded draft pool. Is there no history in this because it’s not wise? I think those top talents are game changers but how certain are they vs someone at 25 or 28? 
 

I think Beane looks at all the variables and decides the risks are not worth the reward here. Worse case scenario could be devastating to this team in Allen’s next 2-3 seasons, right within his prime. 
 

Can we compare Demitroff’s history to Beane’? I am not convinced that looking at a different GMs patterns would indicate anything as to what our GM will do. The best predictor of the future is past behavior, not your neighbors. Rare moves are the outliers, and I don’t think the state of the roster and with the other factors (talent pool, cost, risk) I would be floored if this happened. 

 

The reason I compared with Demitroff is to make the point that you don't need to have a history of outlandish moves to make a move like this. Indeed Demitroff's first round trade up track record was otherwise pretty similar to Beane's. 

 

It would, I agree, be an outlier move. And there may be good reasons it won't happen (quite apart from finding the right situation in terms of trade back partner is tricky) but it won't be "because Beane has never done it before." These moves are outliers that you can't predict based on previous behaviour.

Posted
34 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

The reason I compared with Demitroff is to make the point that you don't need to have a history of outlandish moves to make a move like this. Indeed Demitroff's first round trade up track record was otherwise pretty similar to Beane's. 

 

It would, I agree, be an outlier move. And there may be good reasons it won't happen (quite apart from finding the right situation in terms of trade back partner is tricky) but it won't be "because Beane has never done it before." These moves are outliers that you can't predict based on previous behaviour.

I 100% agree that it’ll be tough to find a trade partner. I think though that it’s a very safe bet that they make the calls.

Posted
39 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Here’s a question. Let’s say we draft a WR at 28 and another in the 2nd. They both have average rookie seasons. Let’s say around 40-50 catches and 3-4 tds.

 

Are we set at WR in 2025?

 

Probably depends what those catches look like but I would lean towards yes.

Posted

I think I still want Xavier Worthy at 28 if we don’t move around. His speed is ridiculous and he’s an actual WR, not just a track star.

 

Imagine Allen using his full arm strength on a deep bomb and having a WR capable of actually running under it. We haven’t had that, so Allen has been under throwing his deep bombs (leading to some INTs).

  • Agree 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, DapperCam said:

I think I still want Xavier Worthy at 28 if we don’t move around. His speed is ridiculous and he’s an actual WR, not just a track star.

 

Imagine Allen using his full arm strength on a deep bomb and having a WR capable of actually running under it. We haven’t had that, so Allen has been under throwing his deep bombs (leading to some INTs).


I just don’t think he’ll be there. I think the WRs with special traits are gonna go but it would be interesting to watch him with Allen for sure 

  • Agree 1
Posted

Posted in another thread but here is Dane Brugler's draft for Buffalo where he has them taking Two WR.

 

Buffalo Bills

1 (17). Brian Thomas Jr., WR, LSU
2 (60). Cole Bishop, S, Utah
4 (128). Javon Baker, WR, UCF
5 (160). Beaux Limmer, G/C, Arkansas
5 (163). Nelson Ceaser III, Edge, Houston
6 (200). Tyler Davis, DT, Clemson
6 (204). Ethan Driskell, OT, Marshall
7 (248). Kimani Vidal, RB, Troy

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Regarding the "Trading up for Marvin Harrison Jr" talk...

I just keep coming back to the same few thoughts:

1. We've seen for several years now the same pattern: The Bills win the division, get a decent seed in the playoffs, and then what happens when they play the Chiefs or Bengals? It's the Josh Allen show, and no one else on the team steps up and makes big plays when the team needs it most. Whereas the Chiefs have Chris Jones and Travis Kelce stepping up, and the Bengals have Ja'Marr Chase or Tee Higgins making big plays in big moments...when you close your eyes and try to picture someone other than Josh Allen making a big play in the divisional round, who do you picture? For me, the answer is "no one". That needs to change. We've seen what happens when Josh is surrounded by a handful of GOOD players. We have yet to surround him with some truly GREAT ones.

 

2. The Bills have been hitting singles and doubles in the draft for years now, but very few home runs. They have drafted good players, but very few STARS. I'm okay with them swinging for the fences this year to try to get our offense a STAR.

3. Fans (and teams) sometimes cling to draft picks too dearly. Let's suppose Beane trades all of his early picks this year and his 1st and 2nd round picks next year to move up. We don't end up picking again until round 5 this year, and we lack a 1st and one of our two 2nds next year. If the result of that is the Bills acquiring a potentially Hall of Fame level wide receiver to pair with Josh Allen for a decade, will anyone care a year or two from now? Are whatever strong safety and depth defensive end and second tier receiver you'd get with those picks worth more to you than a potential superstar wide receiver to pair with our franchise QB?

I'm sick of being risk averse, I'm sick of seeing no one other than Josh step up in the playoffs, and I'm sick of always clinging to our draft picks like precious gold. Gold can be traded for valuable assets, ya know. Like generational playmakers with HOF bloodlines.

Go get me one of the big three. Picks be damned.

Edited by Logic
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

Draft Legette at 28 and you have your height/weight/speed guy for the next five years, then use MN 2nd rounder to move up from 60 for Polk and you have a jack of all trades guy with a high floor. Both have great hands, both have dawg mentalities, both give you something you're missing. Set at WR for two years, go on a spending spree next year for high impact guys at other premium positions (like DE), then round out the rest of the roster with solid day 3 guys at S, RB, LB, IOL depth, etc.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Logic said:

Regarding the "Trading up for Marvin Harrison Jr" talk...

I just keep coming back to the same few thoughts:

1. We've seen for several years now the same pattern: The Bills win the division, get a decent seed in the playoffs, and then what happens when they play the Chiefs or Bengals? It's the Josh Allen show, and no one else on the team steps up and makes big plays when the team needs it most. Whereas the Chiefs have Chris Jones and Travis Kelce stepping up, and the Bengals have Ja'Marr Chase or Tee Higgins making big plays in big moments...when you close your eyes and try to picture someone other than Josh Allen making a big play in the divisional round, who do you picture? For me, the answer is "no one". That needs to change. We've seen what happens when Josh is surrounded by a handful of GOOD players. We have yet to surround him with some truly GREAT ones.

 

2. The Bills have been hitting singles and doubles in the draft for years now, but very few home runs. They have drafted good players, but very few STARS. I'm okay with them swinging for the fences this year to try to get our offense a STAR.

3. Fans (and teams) sometimes cling to draft picks too dearly. Let's suppose Beane trades all of his early picks this year and his 1st and 2nd round picks next year. We don't end up picking until round 5 this year, and we lack a 1st and one of our two 2nds next year. If the result of that is the Bills acquiring a potentially Hall of Fame level wide receiver to pair with Josh Allen for a decade, will anyone care a year or two from now? Are whatever strong safety and depth defensive end and second tier receiver you'd get with those picks worth more to you than a potential superstar wide receiver to pair with our franchise QB?

I'm sick of being risk averse, I'm sick of seeing no one other than Josh step up in the playoffs, and I'm sick of always clinging to our draft picks like precious gold. Gold can be traded for valuable assets, ya know. Like generational playmakers with HOF bloodlines.

Go get me one of the big three. Picks be damned.

I totally agree with you, but I can't find a way to do it. The Vikings have two firsts in this draft and I think they will trade those plus a 1st next year to Arizona for 4. They will then take McCarthy who will bust, but I digress. You then have the Chargers at 5 with all the WRs still on the board. In order to get there, the Bills would probably have to trade 2024 1st, 2024 2nd, 2025 1st and 2025 2nd (from Vikings) and that still probably isn't enough. If it took 3 1st roud picks and two 2nds would you still want them to do that? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Jermaine Burton is next up for Matt Harmon...looks like his profile will be posted today or tomorrow. The data is pretty good though. 3rd best success rate against man in the draft class, though he is tied with Nabers for 3rd worst against zone. 3rd best against press coverage as well and I know his hands are considered to be very good. Says based purely on film and his data, Burton would be a 1st round pick. Maybe bumped down to early 2nd round based on his off-field issues.

Edited by DCOrange
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Low Positive said:

I totally agree with you, but I can't find a way to do it. The Vikings have two firsts in this draft and I think they will trade those plus a 1st next year to Arizona for 4. They will then take McCarthy who will bust, but I digress. You then have the Chargers at 5 with all the WRs still on the board. In order to get there, the Bills would probably have to trade 2024 1st, 2024 2nd, 2025 1st and 2025 2nd (from Vikings) and that still probably isn't enough. If it took 3 1st roud picks and two 2nds would you still want them to do that? 


I'm fine with the 1st and 2nd this year AND a 1st and 2nd next year, and later round considerations. 

Next year, the Bills would still have 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc...In a sense, they'd still have a pretty full allotment of picks.

This year, of course, they'd be picking only in the late rounds, and would likely get nothing more than depth players. Arguably, though, at all positions other than WR and safety, that's all the Bills really need. There aren't a ton of starting spots available on this team.

To answer your question: Three 1sts is too much for me, but I don't necessarily think that would be necessary.

I'm not adamant that they need to get all the way up to 5, or that the pick has to be MHJ. If, say, Nabers or Odunze falls to somewhere between picks 7 and 9 -- where I could see both the Titans and Bears being willing to trade back and collect more picks -- the trade becomes a little more achievable. And I'd still be quite happy with either of those two guys, particularly Nabers, who I think is the most perfect fit for the Bills of all the WRs in this year's class.

Posted

The more I think about it the more we aren’t taking a WR round 1 barring a trade up for one of the top 3 guys. 
 

The rest of the group have so many other issues with each prospect and we’ve brought in a bunch of round 1 guys that aren’t WR’s into the building.

 

Tells me that unless we get one of the big three , perhaps we move up a little in the 2nd to grab a WR which helps mitigate the risk/reward (with regards to draft capital if he busts)

Posted
1 hour ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Posted this in another thread but thought it needed to be here too.

 

 

Sounds like a team wants him to slide to them.  Fluid guy with plus hands.  Best games vs best competition.  I think he is very much a possible target at 28.  

5 minutes ago, DJB said:

The more I think about it the more we aren’t taking a WR round 1 barring a trade up for one of the top 3 guys. 
 

The rest of the group have so many other issues with each prospect and we’ve brought in a bunch of round 1 guys that aren’t WR’s into the building.

 

Tells me that unless we get one of the big three , perhaps we move up a little in the 2nd to grab a WR which helps mitigate the risk/reward (with regards to draft capital if he busts)

I would than question what player available at 28 wont have a level of risk?  If they were clean prospects they would be top 5 or top 10 guys. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
On 4/12/2024 at 2:26 PM, MikePJ76 said:

I can not believe what people are willing to trade to move up for a wr.

 

Its total insanity to me.  

 

They absolutely can not move this years 2 in any scenario that doesn't give them a 2 back and eating Diggs cap number and being in this situation I think dictates they keep that 2 next year from the trade.

 

They need all the young affordable players they can get.  

 

I am hoping a EDGE rusher falls to them/a wr they like falls to them or they move back and get a 3 for this year or another high 4 and 5 for this year.

 

not hitting on a wr1 could also be seen as a fatal flaw 

 

the chiefs are adding wideouts 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Mat68 said:

Sounds like a team wants him to slide to them.  Fluid guy with plus hands.  Best games vs best competition.  I think he is very much a possible target at 28.  

I would than question what player available at 28 wont have a level of risk?  If they were clean prospects they would be top 5 or top 10 guys. 


Right everyone expects a clean 1,000 yard rookie who’s 6’3 210 pounds that runs a 4.3 who produced 3 years in college and expect them at 28 with no flaws. Rookie will be lucky to have 50 catches for 7-800 yards rookie year with the weapons the Bills have and yes they still have good weapons after Davis and Diggs departed 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...