Buffalo_Stampede Posted January 26 Posted January 26 (edited) Pretty amazing comment. He says it’s based on film study. The Bills don’t have a number 1 receiver. Comment starts at 2:13 in. But it’s a good listen. Not sure if this link will work. https://go.audacy.com/rzMEawrpGGb Edited January 26 by Buffalo_Stampede 4 1 11 Quote
Success Posted January 26 Posted January 26 I mean, I'd agree. I'd like to say it's Diggs, and think he could be. But his production doesn't match what you would expect of a #1. 7 7 Quote
Gregg Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Diggs is 30 now and will be 31 next season. That's not old but if his subpar 2nd half of the season wasn't injury related then his decline will probably continue as he gets older. 10 1 Quote
frostbitmic Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Under Dorsey, Diggs was the only receiver on the field it seemed. Under Brady they spread the ball around more and use Cook a lot more. 2 3 Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted January 26 Author Posted January 26 1 minute ago, 4merper4mer said: That’s a joke. What was crazy to me is Chris Brown and Steve Tasker didn’t even say anything about the comment. No reaction. Makes me wonder. 1 1 1 Quote
Low Positive Posted January 26 Posted January 26 The Ravens don't have one either. They are probably going to the SB with no WR having over 1,000 yards. Zay Flowers led the team with 858, but no one else even had 600 yards. Also, Lamar is their leading rusher. 4 Quote
nedboy7 Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Im not buying it. Dude had a poor 1/2 season. He will be back in form. 1 7 3 2 Quote
ToGoGo Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Diggs will decline into the best slot receiver in the league. We just need to take work off his plate and give it to quality receivers. 4 1 4 2 Quote
BBFL Posted January 26 Posted January 26 8 minutes ago, Low Positive said: The Ravens don't have one either. They are probably going to the SB with no WR having over 1,000 yards. Zay Flowers led the team with 858, but no one else even had 600 yards. Also, Lamar is their leading rusher. Remove Diggs those few years and that’s exactly where we were at lol 1 Quote
Johnnycage46 Posted January 26 Posted January 26 I trust Cosell's analysis as he doesn't appear to be emotionally-biased and goes by the tape (tape don't lie) 6 16 1 Quote
SoonerBillsFan Posted January 26 Posted January 26 24 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Pretty amazing comment. He says it’s based on film study. The Bills don’t have a number 1 receiver. Comment starts at 2:13 in. But it’s a good listen. Not sure if this link will work. https://go.audacy.com/rzMEawrpGGb He is correct. 9 Quote
Brand J Posted January 26 Posted January 26 I felt that Brandon Beane coming out and saying “Diggs is a number one receiver,” in his season ending presser was curious. He no doubt hears the chatter and I believe knows he’s gotta get a guy who strikes fear in the opponent. Diggs is great, but I don’t think any of these teams fear him. Even the Chiefs were puffing out their chest saying “he knew what was up” when Sneed locked him up. We’ll have to hit on a guy, a future number one who plays like it right out of the gate. 2 1 Quote
SoonerBillsFan Posted January 26 Posted January 26 9 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Im not buying it. Dude had a poor 1/2 season. He will be back in form. Based on What? He is about to be 31, Players get worse as they age and Diggs fell off a cliff the 2nd half of this season. 3 Quote
corta765 Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Just going to point out to those who are upset on this comment that the list of WR's who kept up 1000 yds + production post 30 years old is incredibly small with Larry Fitzgerald being the greatest outlier and he was moved to the slot. 2 Quote
JerseyBills Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Diggs still elite but his late season production is def concerning Shakir and Kincaid are young studs, we need 1 more difference maker and a guy to develop. Maybe Shorter emerges next year, he's physically a beast 1 1 Quote
Gugny Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Wasn’t Diggs leading the league in receptions up until Dorsey got canned? I’m not bringing this up to bash Brady (I like wins); only making a point that Diggs was every bit of a #1 until the change was made. 4 1 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Well, when your OC thinks that throwing to Diggs either behind the LOS or a few yards along the sideline is how to get him the ball...... What are we doing here? WHY is it so difficult to run inside slants with a guy who is elite at it 2 1 Quote
nedboy7 Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Just now, SoonerBillsFan said: Based on What? He is about to be 31, Players get worse as they age and Diggs fell off a cliff the 2nd half of this season. I just dont see how his age can catch up to him in one week. Usually you would see a slow decline. But perhaps he has. We will find out. No way are they trading him. Quote
Allen2Moulds Posted January 26 Posted January 26 17 minutes ago, Low Positive said: The Ravens don't have one either. They are probably going to the SB with no WR having over 1,000 yards. Zay Flowers led the team with 858, but no one else even had 600 yards. Also, Lamar is their leading rusher. No....but they bully everyone in the trenches. Still don't expect them to beat KC. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.