Jump to content

Cole Bishop S Utah......2nd or 3rd round target for the Bills?? Edit: ran a 4.45 40!


Recommended Posts

Posted

After the Bills hopefully target a WR in round 1 such as Xavier Leggette or Xavier Worthy, Safety may be a position addressed in round 2 or 3.

 

I think Cole Bishop is an intriguing prospect.....he has a lot of McBeane traits, but I'm not 100% sure he would be a fit in McD's Defense, but definitely worth a look. He may be a better fit in the Taylor Rapp role.

 

What do you think??

 

From Bleacher Report:

 

Cole Bishop is a multiyear starter with very good size for a safety at 6'2" and 207 pounds. He's an instinctual player with a high football IQ and the versatility to play all over the field. He has the physicality to be a box player and the movement skills to cover in space.

While playing the run game, Bishop excels when he's close to the line of scrimmage. He uses his instincts to identify and react to the run with very good short-area quickness, and he closes on the ball with very good angles. He's a strong tackler who does a good job of fronting up and running through the ball-carrier when in the box, but he tends to dive and have more inconsistent tackling when on the edge. Bishop is a downhill player who does a great job of attacking the line of scrimmage and playing close to or in the backfield.

 

As a pass defender, Bishop has shown the ability to drop as a deep defender, where he is able to play the routes in front of him and react to the ball in the air. When defending intermediate routes, he has the ability to play man coverage, using his short-area bursts to get out of breaks and drive on the ball.

Bishop does his best when playing as an underneath defender, where he can pass off receivers and has over-the-top help. He is a short strider with some stiff hips, and he struggles to turn and run. He's slow to climb and gain growth, which may cause issues in the NFL.

 

Though Bishop has versatility within his game, he lacks true scheme versatility. He's best as a box defender, so he'll fit best as a strong safety who can occasionally switch up his look as a deep defender. Bishop could carve out a successful NFL career if the right team selects him.

 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
  • Special K changed the title to Cole Bishop S Utah......2nd or 3rd round target for the Bills??
Posted

Maybe Baltimore/KC will have some defense in it, but man… it’s the last thing I want to discuss after - yet another - playoff loss to KC. 
 

36 ppg and Zero Sacks.  That’s out postseason defense against them.

 

And fwiw, KC has an elite defense and their best defense was our own players dropping passes in a game that ended on our kicker missing a 44 yard FG to tie the game. 
 

I know we still need to put a competent defense out there, but if we’re spending a Day 2 pick on defense, that guy better be able to make a difference in the postseason.  
 

Does a Safety do that?  I don’t know.

 

Ive been a big DL early proponent, but if refs don’t call holding in the playoffs, what’s the point?   Maybe a high end young Safety could help. 

  • Agree 1
Posted

Rd1: Cooper DeJean 

Rd2: Cole Bishop

Rd3: Braiden McGregor

Rd4: Ladd McConkey

Rd5: Will Shipley

Rd5: Tommy Eichenberg

 

It’s like a message board wet dream! 


I kid, I kid

 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 5
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Dislike 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, SCBills said:

Maybe Baltimore/KC will have some defense in it, but man… it’s the last thing I want to discuss after - yet another - playoff loss to KC. 
 

36 ppg and Zero Sacks.  That’s out postseason defense against them.

 

And fwiw, KC has an elite defense and their best defense was our own players dropping passes in a game that ended on our kicker missing a 44 yard FG to tie the game. 
 

I know we still need to put a competent defense out there, but if we’re spending a Day 2 pick on defense, that guy better be able to make a difference in the postseason.  
 

Does a Safety do that?  I don’t know.

 

Ive been a big DL early proponent, but if refs don’t call holding in the playoffs, what’s the point?   Maybe a high end young Safety could help. 

 

There is no doubt the Bills need to get 2 WR's out of this draft, but the Defense is going to have to get younger and cheaper, especially at the safety position.....unfortunately, the draft is the easiest way to do this.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Special K said:

 

There is no doubt the Bills need to get 2 WR's out of this draft, but the Defense is going to have to get younger and cheaper, especially at the safety position.....unfortunately, the draft is the easiest way to do this.


From what I seen of Bishop I think he is a good fit. I am not sure McDermott will trust the position to a rookie, but we do need an infusion of youth and depth at that position. I think they bring back Taylor Rapp who just turned 26 and got a ton better as the year went on. Plus he has a ring. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:


From what I seen of Bishop I think he is a good fit. I am not sure McDermott will trust the position to a rookie, but we do need an infusion of youth and depth at that position. I think they bring back Taylor Rapp who just turned 26 and got a ton better as the year went on. Plus he has a ring. 

I think we’re getting into territory where McDermott is going to have to start trusting rooks a little bit

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 4
Posted
11 minutes ago, Special K said:

 

There is no doubt the Bills need to get 2 WR's out of this draft, but the Defense is going to have to get younger and cheaper, especially at the safety position.....unfortunately, the draft is the easiest way to do this.

 

Bills are pretty great at getting talented DBs in the 5th-7th rounds so I am not too worried about it.  Pretty much they can plug and play anyone at DB and they are mostly OK

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

I think we’re getting into territory where McDermott is going to have to start trusting rooks a little bit

 

For sure, I just don't see it happening at one of the most critical positions in his scheme. I don't want this to turn into another McDermott thread, but he truly needs to evolve and I just don't think he has it in him. Usually, guys have to get fired to learn their lesson and adjust like Reid, Belichick, Pete Caroll. We do need an infusion of youth and talent at the safety position. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, SCBills said:

Maybe Baltimore/KC will have some defense in it, but man… it’s the last thing I want to discuss after - yet another - playoff loss to KC. 
 

36 ppg and Zero Sacks.  That’s out postseason defense against them.

 

And fwiw, KC has an elite defense and their best defense was our own players dropping passes in a game that ended on our kicker missing a 44 yard FG to tie the game. 
 

I know we still need to put a competent defense out there, but if we’re spending a Day 2 pick on defense, that guy better be able to make a difference in the postseason.  
 

Does a Safety do that?  I don’t know.

 

Ive been a big DL early proponent, but if refs don’t call holding in the playoffs, what’s the point?   Maybe a high end young Safety could help. 

Any position can make a difference in the postseason and if the player is a difference maker definitely can make a difference no matter the position. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, CNYfan said:

I thought #30DJackson had a very poor tackling game against KC in the Divisional Round.  Very poor.    

 

Yeah he's just limited. he is what he is as an okay depth corner which teams need. But if he has to start a critical playoff game or for long stretches you are in trouble. 

Posted
9 hours ago, Special K said:

 

There is no doubt the Bills need to get 2 WR's out of this draft, but the Defense is going to have to get younger and cheaper, especially at the safety position.....unfortunately, the draft is the easiest way to do this.

 

Outside of 1 (mayyybe 2) WR, I expect this draft to be completely Defense.

 

We'll need 2 Safeties, 2 DEs, and 2DTs, at least 1 CB, and we've certainly shown we can never have too much LB depth.

 

There's no other open spots on Offense anyways, even at depth positions.

 

 

8 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

I think we’re getting into territory where McDermott is going to have to start trusting rooks a little bit

 

For all the crap I give McD, he definitely showed he has evolved in this already. As evidenced by all the action Kincaid saw, and well, this:

 

 

  • Shocked 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Outside of 1 (mayyybe 2) WR, I expect this draft to be completely Defense.

 

We'll need 2 Safeties, 2 DEs, and 2DTs, at least 1 CB, and we've certainly shown we can never have too much LB depth.

 

There's no other open spots on Offense anyways, even at depth positions.

 

 

 

For all the crap I give McD, he definitely showed he has evolved in this already. As evidenced by all the action Kincaid saw, and well, this:

 

 

 

I don't know that this is evidence of a change in mindset, McDermott has always been willing to start a rookie... if they've penciled in to do so from the start.

 

See: Tre White, Edmunds, Ed Oliver, etc. An anomaly might be Christian Benford, who wasn't drafted to start but did so after beating out a rookie who was: Kaiir Elam.

 

What McDermott has traditionally resisted is moving a rookie up into a primary playing position after the season starts, unless forced into action by injury. For example not giving Shorter a chance this year, despite the struggles of receivers in front of him on the depth chart who were ineffective all year. And I'm not saying whether that's the right or wrong mindset for a coach to have late in the season, just making the observation that I think he's been consistent with that approach from day one.

Posted

At the earliest the 2nd Round. I wouldn't be shocked if the Bills add a veteran to replace Hyde. 

29 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Outside of 1 (mayyybe 2) WR, I expect this draft to be completely Defense.

 

We'll need 2 Safeties, 2 DEs, and 2DTs, at least 1 CB, and we've certainly shown we can never have too much LB depth.

 

There's no other open spots on Offense anyways, even at depth positions.

 

 

 

For all the crap I give McD, he definitely showed he has evolved in this already. As evidenced by all the action Kincaid saw, and well, this:

 

 

There's an opening at RB2. Isaiah Davis of South Dakota State could be an option in Rounds 5. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

I would just load up on Michigan defensive players in rounds 3,4,5 and use the 1st two picks on WR and maybe another OT just in case we get an injury to Spence or Dion. Then let’s go. 

 

I think they like Van Demark, and seemingly with good reason.  Bates can flip out to OT in an emergency.  

 

I'll never hate on them drafting OL, but we seem pretty locked in at 7 guys, then we'll see what they do with Edwards and Ifedi's spots.

 

My ideal Draft would absolutely be going WR back to back in RD1 and RD2.   Just completely lock in the Offense around Allen, and then spend the rest of the Draft on the Defense. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, SCBills said:

 

I think they like Van Demark, and seemingly with good reason.  Bates can flip out to OT in an emergency.  

 

I'll never hate on them drafting OL, but we seem pretty locked in at 7 guys, then we'll see what they do with Edwards and Ifedi's spots.

 

My ideal Draft would absolutely be going WR back to back in RD1 and RD2.   Just completely lock in the Offense around Allen, and then spend the rest of the Draft on the Defense. 

 

Back-to-back WRs that early just doesnt make sense from a value stand point.

 

Taking another WR in the 2nd means you are spending a high pick on a guy who will be, at best, your 5th option on Offense behind:

 

1st Round WR

Diggs

Kincaid

Running the Ball

 

If a guy falls, like Jermaine Burton to the 5th, and they want to double dip then - great.

 

But passing up a Safety who might play every Defensive snap, or even a DT who will play half of them in rotation, for a guy who probably wouldnt see the field on most Offensive snaps is just roster mismanagement.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Back-to-back WRs that early just doesnt make sense from a value stand point.

 

Taking another WR in the 2nd means you are spending a high pick on a guy who will be, at best, your 5th option on Offense behind:

 

1st Round WR

Diggs

Kincaid

Running the Ball

 

If a guy falls, like Jermaine Burton to the 5th, and they want to double dip then - great.

 

But passing up a Safety who might play every Defensive snap, or even a DT who will play half of them in rotation, for a guy who probably wouldnt see the field on most Offensive snaps is just roster mismanagement.

 

Valid.. I'm probably just scarred from what we saw from everyone not named Kincaid or Shakir on Sunday. 

 

My rational is that there could very well be Late RD1/Early RD2 caliber WR's available late in RD2 due to the strength of this WR Draft.  If we cut Harty and want to keep Diggs fresh as he gets older, there would be snaps for another outside WR rotating in with Diggs and a RD1 WR, along with sets where we may utillize Diggs out of the slot more.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

we might get a 3rd comp pick for edmunds, but we have a lot of like 5th and 5th round picks, like 11 picks total

 

 

we are going to have to let guys go for cap savings, and guys are off contract too (von and groot are our only signed DEs).  we will have low round picks getting burn at DT and DE, and likely safety too.  cb when healthy we are good (we could cut tre imo, but we have tre, douglas, elam, benford for 2 spots), and LB we have an oddly deep group (dodson, milano, williams, TB, spector).

 

given how zero impact our safeties and DL had vs kc, i'm fine w that.  time for mcd to make chicken salad out of chicken poop on D.

 

we need to get better on O, and just fill out the roster otherwise.  I expect a thumper RB to get drafted, at least 2 DL, and 1 S, but we need a real stud WR more than anything and can just find street FAs to fill in lots of spaces on D.  cripes, we had aj klien doing SFA in our biggest game

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...