Irv Posted January 20 Posted January 20 25 minutes ago, Wacka said: Yeah like you posting here like crazy while supposedly vacationing in Portugal. You are like taking a Greyhound to Buffalo and then snowplowing down the bunny hill at Kissing Bridge. Fergy’s getting plowed? I knew there was something wrong with her. 1
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted January 20 Author Posted January 20 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Almost equal at greater than 100k. No data for over 250k which is a reasonable threshold for “wealth” Ah yes the data shatters your myth, move the goalposts. The under 30k deadbeats is your party… you’ve got to be extremely lazy or barely working at all to not clear 30k. and in the 100k split your saying 47% vs 44% isn’t a majority? Now look at the Biden trump election. By in one bracket. Enjoy!
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 20 Posted January 20 1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: Ah yes the data shatters your myth, move the goalposts. The under 30k deadbeats is your party… you’ve got to be extremely lazy or barely working at all to not clear 30k. and in the 100k split your saying 47% vs 44% isn’t a majority? Now look at the Biden trump election. By in one bracket. Enjoy! Show me your data. What was the margin of error in the pew study? Carry on with your bs. You aim to confuse not inform. Classic fascist tactic 1
daz28 Posted January 20 Posted January 20 8 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/religious-landscape-study/compare/party-affiliation/by/income-distribution/ They're younger, and younger people make less: A majority of Democratic voters (57%) were ages 50 and older in the 2022 midterms, while Seven-in-ten Republican voters were 50 and older in the most recent election As already shown, college degrees make about double: the Democratic Party’s voters in 2022 (51% held college degrees while 49% did not). By contrast, a majority of Republican voters in 2022 had no college degree (63%); a smaller share had a college degree or more (37%). 8 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Show me your data. What was the margin of error in the pew study? Carry on with your bs. You aim to confuse not inform. Classic fascist tactic LOLOL The 2014 U.S. Religious Landscape Study is based on telephone interviews with more than 35,000 Americans from all 50 states. This is the second time the Pew Research Center has conducted a Religious Landscape Study. The first was conducted in 2007, also with a telephone survey of more than 35,000 Americans. The results from the new Landscape Study will be published in a series of reports. 1
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted January 20 Author Posted January 20 10 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Show me your data. What was the margin of error in the pew study? Carry on with your bs. You aim to confuse not inform. Classic fascist tactic Here’s another one.. you trust universities right? https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/how-groups-voted-2020
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted January 20 Author Posted January 20 5 minutes ago, daz28 said: They're younger, and younger people make less: A majority of Democratic voters (57%) were ages 50 and older in the 2022 midterms, while Seven-in-ten Republican voters were 50 and older in the most recent election As already shown, college degrees make about double: the Democratic Party’s voters in 2022 (51% held college degrees while 49% did not). By contrast, a majority of Republican voters in 2022 had no college degree (63%); a smaller share had a college degree or more (37%). LOLOL The 2014 U.S. Religious Landscape Study is based on telephone interviews with more than 35,000 Americans from all 50 states. This is the second time the Pew Research Center has conducted a Religious Landscape Study. The first was conducted in 2007, also with a telephone survey of more than 35,000 Americans. The results from the new Landscape Study will be published in a series of reports. blah blah blah. Deadbeats vote more democrat and people earning 100k vote more Republican. You can hand wring, whine, obfuscate and try to rationalize a different reality all you want. I can find studies and election polls all day long showing voter tendency by income and how it shifts as you climb the brackets into more successful people, at least until you reach the top half percent elites that influence the government.
BillsFanNC Posted January 20 Posted January 20 That's got be a great bus trip with old Quack, MD spewing his TDS bile everywhere. I'm sure he's super popular! 1
daz28 Posted January 20 Posted January 20 5 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: Here’s another one.. you trust universities right? https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/how-groups-voted-2020 Look at the age groups, and tell me how that might relate to income. For the last time, far more democrats have college degrees, and they earn double. That 18-29 age group Biden dominated will be making good money eventually. The average salary in America is $49k. Biden dominated the largest demographic group $50-100k by 57% to 42%. Somewhere between S100-500k the democrats retake a large lead. Let's face it, your thread is a dud. 2
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted January 20 Author Posted January 20 Just now, daz28 said: Look at the age groups, and tell me how that might relate to income. For the last time, far more democrats have college degrees, and they earn double. That 18-29 age group Biden dominated will be making good money eventually. The average salary in America is $49k. Biden dominated the largest demographic group $50-100k by 57% to 42%. Somewhere between S100-500k the democrats retake a large lead. Let's face it, your thread is a dud. Dud ?? You are plugging your ears screaming not true then rambling about some irrelevant nonsense. Find on me study where the 100K+ income bracket lean D. I mean maybe if Biden wins again and we get more hyperinflation such that 100k is the new 30k deadbeat group. Take away deadbeat votes and Republicans win elections like 60/40.
daz28 Posted January 20 Posted January 20 1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: Dud ?? You are plugging your ears screaming not true then rambling about some irrelevant nonsense. Find on me study where the 100K+ income bracket lean D. I mean maybe if Biden wins again and we get more hyperinflation such that 100k is the new 30k deadbeat group. Take away deadbeat votes and Republicans win elections like 60/40. In 2012, earners over $102k were 31% democrat, 31% republican, and 38% independent. It's even, except you have to take into consideration that there's more democrats than republicans. 49% of all registered voters either identify as Democrats or lean to the party, while 44% identify as Republicans or lean to the GOP. Game set match. 1 1 1
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted January 20 Author Posted January 20 (edited) 24 minutes ago, daz28 said: In 2012, earners over $102k were 31% democrat, 31% republican, and 38% independent. It's even, except you have to take into consideration that there's more democrats than republicans. 49% of all registered voters either identify as Democrats or lean to the party, while 44% identify as Republicans or lean to the GOP. Game set match. How is that a game set match that over a decade ago the thing im saying is fact now and supporting with recent election data and a pew study may not have always been true. But since you’re doing 2012, here’s Obama Romney https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/11/does-your-wage-predict-your-vote/264541/ And majority independent? What the hell can anyone conclude from that nonsense keep trying . Even as flawed as your attempts are I admire the effort. Keep it up and you might get into one of these income brackets where you don’t want to donate more to the federal government and starting voting differently also, did you deliberately omit the text of that 2012 npr study and the graph from the low income group or the other ten years of data in the graph…. No that’s probably why you didn’t link it 😂 Edited January 20 by Over 29 years of fanhood
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 20 Posted January 20 These folks don’t look high income to me. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/gallery/2019/dec/11/donald-trump-supporters-what-they-wear-in-pictures wanna caricature of high income, watch a life insurance ad. Pretty close to real life
daz28 Posted January 20 Posted January 20 4 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: How is that a game set match that over a decade ago the thing im saying is fact now and supporting with recent election data and a pew study may not have always been true. And majority independent? What the hell can anyone conclude from that nonsense keep trying little tyke. Even as flawed as your attempts are I admire the effort. Keep it up and you might get into one of these income brackets where you don’t want to donate more to the federal government Your pew study was 2014, and sample was 35k. The CBS exit poll sample was 3,520 people. LOL Democrats hold 44.6% more wealth than Republicans. The average household net worth is: $237,639 in Democrat states $164,254 in Republican states In everyday American households, it seems that Democrats have a higher mean salary. It’s true that many of the wealthiest families in the country are contributing to Republican campaigns. On the contrary, families registered as Democrats have higher annual salaries than Republicans, statistically speaking. Democratic districts have seen their median household income soar in a decade—from $54,000 in 2008 to $61,000 in 2018. By contrast, the income level in Republican districts began slightly higher in 2008, but then declined from $55,000 to $53,000. Underlying these changes have been eye-popping shifts in economic performance. Democratic-voting districts have seen their GDP per seat grow by a third since 2008, from $35.7 billion to $48.5 billion a seat, whereas Republican districts saw their output slightly decline from $33.2 billion to $32.6 billion.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted January 20 Author Posted January 20 Just now, daz28 said: Your pew study was 2014, and sample was 35k. The CBS exit poll sample was 3,520 people. LOL Democrats hold 44.6% more wealth than Republicans. The average household net worth is: $237,639 in Democrat states $164,254 in Republican states In everyday American households, it seems that Democrats have a higher mean salary. It’s true that many of the wealthiest families in the country are contributing to Republican campaigns. On the contrary, families registered as Democrats have higher annual salaries than Republicans, statistically speaking. Democratic districts have seen their median household income soar in a decade—from $54,000 in 2008 to $61,000 in 2018. By contrast, the income level in Republican districts began slightly higher in 2008, but then declined from $55,000 to $53,000. Underlying these changes have been eye-popping shifts in economic performance. Democratic-voting districts have seen their GDP per seat grow by a third since 2008, from $35.7 billion to $48.5 billion a seat, whereas Republican districts saw their output slightly decline from $33.2 billion to $32.6 billion. none of this refutes anything I have said. I know average income of elite democrats is higher, they are better at rigging the system and pushing tax burden to the working families and fooling you. 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 20 Posted January 20 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: none of this refutes anything I have said. I know average income of elite democrats is higher, they are better at rigging the system and pushing tax burden to the working families and fooling you. So when we “elites” win it’s cuz we’re rigging the system but when you plebs do it’s cuz of hard work? Pathetic. Btw the fastest way to estimate wealth is to look at shoes. Anything less than Johnston and Murphy isn’t bonafide Edited January 20 by Joe Ferguson forever 1
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted January 20 Author Posted January 20 9 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: These folks don’t look high income to me. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/gallery/2019/dec/11/donald-trump-supporters-what-they-wear-in-pictures wanna caricature of high income, watch a life insurance ad. Pretty close to real life neither do these… what’s your point ?? https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/02/us/politics/joe-biden-women-me-too.html
Pokebball Posted January 20 Posted January 20 8 minutes ago, daz28 said: Your pew study was 2014, and sample was 35k. The CBS exit poll sample was 3,520 people. LOL Democrats hold 44.6% more wealth than Republicans. The average household net worth is: $237,639 in Democrat states $164,254 in Republican states In everyday American households, it seems that Democrats have a higher mean salary. It’s true that many of the wealthiest families in the country are contributing to Republican campaigns. On the contrary, families registered as Democrats have higher annual salaries than Republicans, statistically speaking. Democratic districts have seen their median household income soar in a decade—from $54,000 in 2008 to $61,000 in 2018. By contrast, the income level in Republican districts began slightly higher in 2008, but then declined from $55,000 to $53,000. Underlying these changes have been eye-popping shifts in economic performance. Democratic-voting districts have seen their GDP per seat grow by a third since 2008, from $35.7 billion to $48.5 billion a seat, whereas Republican districts saw their output slightly decline from $33.2 billion to $32.6 billion. I think it's important to remove the top 1%, or even the top 10%, from a lot of these demographics. I've seen a lot of studies showing how much the top influences the overall result shown. It's quite significant. 1
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted January 20 Author Posted January 20 Just now, Pokebball said: I think it's important to remove the top 1%, or even the top 10%, from a lot of these demographics. I've seen a lot of studies showing how much the top influences the overall result shown. It's quite significant. The place where he cherry picked the stats probably stated so, just like one of the others had 80 data points matching what I’m arguing and one that is neutral. He plucked the neutral data ping and didn’t link. Also one of the other data sets was copied from an unlinked quora post entitled why are republicans higher income than democrats 😂 he edited out the despite the fact that and the conclusion lol. 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 20 Posted January 20 5 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: neither do these… what’s your point ?? https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/02/us/politics/joe-biden-women-me-too.html They do to me. Bet they’re all wearing $300 boots and driving $10000 hogs. It’s a pretty wealthy group generally speaking. my point is the a majority of the upper middle class and above are D’s. $ 100kisnt upper middle class and above 8 minutes ago, Pokebball said: I think it's important to remove the top 1%, or even the top 10%, from a lot of these demographics. I've seen a lot of studies showing how much the top influences the overall result shown. It's quite significant. Bs. That’s a small number of people by definition. No way they skew party affiliation stats 5 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: The place where he cherry picked the stats probably stated so, just like one of the others had 80 data points matching what I’m arguing and one that is neutral. He plucked the neutral data ping and didn’t link. Also one of the other data sets was copied from an unlinked quora post entitled why are republicans higher income than democrats 😂 he edited out the despite the fact that and the conclusion lol. Daz and I embarrassed you. Any independent non cult member would confirm
Pokebball Posted January 20 Posted January 20 5 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: They do to me. Bet they’re all wearing $300 boots and driving $10000 hogs. It’s a pretty wealthy group generally speaking. my point is the a majority of the upper middle class and above are D’s. $ 100kisnt upper middle class and above Bs. That’s a small number of people by definition. No way they skew party affiliation stats Daz and I embarrassed you. Any independent non cult member would confirm I'm talking about income and/or wealth. They skew the results very significantly based on things I've seen.
Recommended Posts