Steptide Posted January 19 Posted January 19 I think elam will be OK in place of benford. If Bernard can play that's YUGE 2 Quote
RobbRiddick Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Von better take the shrink-wrap off and do something in this game 2 2 1 2 Quote
Virgil Posted January 19 Posted January 19 This is huge. Douglas covers Kelce and who covers Rice? If it comes down to needing our defense to need a big stop, we are going to be outmatched in certain positions. I don't like this at all. If we don't have Bernard and Johnson too, we are in trouble. 1 Quote
Gugny Posted January 19 Posted January 19 1 minute ago, RobbRiddick said: Von better take the shrink-wrap off and do something in this game I’ll take “Don’t Hold Your Breath” for $1000, Ken. 1 4 Quote
mushypeaches Posted January 19 Posted January 19 11 minutes ago, Back2Buff said: Rapp is a very underrated injury, especially with Benford out. May need to use Neal again for that big nickel. Neal got zero snaps on defense the last game. We've seen him try and guard Kelce in the past... lot's of holding calls is about it 1 Quote
MikePJ76 Posted January 19 Posted January 19 so davis is out and mcdermott just said Diggs injured his foot during the game then aggravated it at practice and may not practice again today. Unbelievable 1 Quote
Slippery Rubber Mats Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Rapp out means that our 3 safety looks now include Cam Lewis or Hamlin Both those dude would get eaten alive over a whole game IMO 1 Quote
RobbRiddick Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Just now, Virgil said: This is huge. Douglas covers Kelce and who covers Rice? If it comes down to needing our defense to need a big stop, we are going to be outmatched in certain positions. I don't like this at all. If we don't have Bernard and Johnson too, we are in trouble. I agree. IMO we either blow them away by overwhelming them like we did NE in the season opener back in the day or we don't win at all. If we were to win a close one I'd be shocked 1 Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted January 19 Posted January 19 All replaceable. Benford the biggest loss but Jackson is solid. Elam might actually start. The biggest issue is our depth behind these guys is now tested again. 1 Quote
Success Posted January 19 Posted January 19 9 minutes ago, RiotAct said: Davis? Did we sign someone off the street? Oops. Meant Dane. Quote
NewEra Posted January 19 Posted January 19 (edited) 6 hours ago, Steptide said: I think elam will be OK in place of benford. If Bernard can play that's YUGE It will be Dane Edited January 19 by NewEra 1 1 Quote
Magox Posted January 19 Posted January 19 18 minutes ago, NickelCity said: Benford hurts. I thought he'd play. Yes but there isn’t a huge drop off with Jackson. We are just fine with him, Douglas and Taron. 1 Quote
NewEra Posted January 19 Posted January 19 how many starters are the Chiefs missing. I hear they suffer lots of injuries Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted January 19 Posted January 19 2 minutes ago, Slippery Rubber Mats said: Rapp out means that our 3 safety looks now include Cam Lewis or Hamlin Both those dude would get eaten alive over a whole game IMO Cam Lewis has played very well. Not a huge loss there. The loss is the depth. If Lewis gets hurt we’re thin. 1 Quote
mannc Posted January 19 Posted January 19 15 minutes ago, Back2Buff said: Rapp is a very underrated injury, especially with Benford out. May need to use Neal again for that big nickel. We have a lot of depth in the defensive backfield and the Chiefs receivers aren’t exactly Hill and Waddle. Not too concerned. 1 Quote
Generic_Bills_Fan Posted January 19 Posted January 19 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Limeaid said: KC Kings do not have many listed as walking wounded. Only one listed as DNP Thursday. https://www.buffalobills.com/team/injury-report/ Kc is virtually completely healthy…as healthy as I’ve ever seen a team at this point in the season Edited January 19 by Generic_Bills_Fan 1 Quote
vincec Posted January 19 Posted January 19 21 minutes ago, Process said: Honestly this is good news. It means Bernard has a chance which is crazy considering the way it looked on the field. I already wasn't expecting any of the guys ruled out to play. Hopefully Benford can be back next week and Davis for the SB. Rapp is the biggest one on this list, IMO. There's a pretty big dropoff from Rapp to Hamlin / Lewis. The other guys can be adequately covered for. 1 Quote
Augie Posted January 19 Posted January 19 6 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Not much depth to absorb more injuries. An NFL season is a battle of attrition. So far I’ve been impressed with the quality of the depth filling in, but there are always limits. Kudos to the guys coaching up our depth players and having them ready to step in. 1 1 Quote
Sestak4ever Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Just need to avoid any in-game injuries as our depth is lean to say the least. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.