US Egg Posted January 25 Posted January 25 12 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Yeah we saw your best and brightest during insurrection 1.0. Led by a 1 eyed man who, of course, shot his own eye out. Fat jokes? What’s next? Mama jokes?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 25 Posted January 25 (edited) 2 minutes ago, US Egg said: Fat jokes? What’s next? Mama jokes? lighten up Francis! so many opportunities to screen this excellent piece of cinema Edited January 25 by Joe Ferguson forever
BillsFanNC Posted January 25 Posted January 25 13 minutes ago, US Egg said: Fat jokes? What’s next? Mama jokes? L Ron fuk.c stain has a hard time with the facts of the mass trespassing. The guy with the eye patch who "led" the insurrection was Stewart Rhodes. Interestingly, he never entered the Capitol. He was sentenced to 18 years. You know who else never entered the Capitol and we were told that was reason enough to leave him alone? Ray Epps. But Stewart Rhodes planned and encouraged others to go into the Capitol! You know who else pre-planned and encouraged others to storm the Capitol? Ray Epps. It's all so confusing keeping the narrative straight as to who the bad guys are and why... 1
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 25 Posted January 25 1 hour ago, US Egg said: Fat jokes? What’s next? Mama jokes? I would not dare insult her while she's sitting on my lap. 1
US Egg Posted January 25 Posted January 25 1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said: L Ron fuk.c stain has a hard time with the facts of the mass trespassing. The guy with the eye patch who "led" the insurrection was Stewart Rhodes. Interestingly, he never entered the Capitol. He was sentenced to 18 years. You know who else never entered the Capitol and we were told that was reason enough to leave him alone? Ray Epps. But Stewart Rhodes planned and encouraged others to go into the Capitol! You know who else pre-planned and encouraged others to storm the Capitol? Ray Epps. It's all so confusing keeping the narrative straight as to who the bad guys are and why... Oh, that who L.Ron #&$% is. He tries, but, he’s not in league with the big 3 in here. 1 1
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 25 Posted January 25 1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said: L Ron fuk.c stain has a hard time with the facts of the mass trespassing. The guy with the eye patch who "led" the insurrection was Stewart Rhodes. Interestingly, he never entered the Capitol. He was sentenced to 18 years. You know who else never entered the Capitol and we were told that was reason enough to leave him alone? Ray Epps. But Stewart Rhodes planned and encouraged others to go into the Capitol! You know who else pre-planned and encouraged others to storm the Capitol? Ray Epps. It's all so confusing keeping the narrative straight as to who the bad guys are and why... Yes Ray Epps is definitely antifa and fbi. No doubt. Rhodes is innocent I'm sure. Just the DC gulag imprisoning People for a minor attempted coup. It didn't even work why should anyone be jailed? People who overuse the word narrative tend to be gigantic tools of the first order. 2
John from Riverside Posted January 25 Posted January 25 9 minutes ago, US Egg said: Oh, that who L.Ron #&$% is. He tries, but, he’s not in league with the big 3 in here. Who exactly do you consider the big three Please tell me that you consider yourself one of them. I need a good laugh today. 1
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 25 Posted January 25 2 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: Who exactly do you consider the big three Please tell me that you consider yourself one of them. I need a good laugh today. He probably has no idea what he's talking about. This info didn't come from Hannity so it's just verbal diarrhea parroting another moron billsfan. The guy who likes to cry qanon while quoting....QANON! 1
BillsFanNC Posted January 25 Posted January 25 19 minutes ago, US Egg said: Oh, that who L.Ron #&$% is. He tries, but, he’s not in league with the big 3 in here. There are many useful idiot pretenders here, most fall short simply because they don't spend every waking moment here being a useful idiot like the big 3.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 25 Posted January 25 20 minutes ago, US Egg said: Oh, that who L.Ron #&$% is. He tries, but, he’s not in league with the big 3 in here. wtf...the socialists are ranking the posters. orwell's animal farm says "Hi"
Buffarukus Posted January 26 Posted January 26 (edited) 4 hours ago, ChiGoose said: Ok, since it’s obvious that the GOP doesn’t want to solve the border crisis and they admit that they won’t do it for political reasons, yet so many here seem to believe both that the Dems want the border crisis and that the issue hurts them: What is the alleged Dem theory of the case here? Get more immigrants in so that people like Dems less? come on, they admit they wont do it for political reasons? so let me get this straight. 3 straight years of there is no problem. If there is, its a good thing! The more the merrier! Destroying barricades texas is setting up and taking them to court to do so. Liberal sanctuaries screaming stop, we cant take anymore. Its all republicans fault with ZERO response from the federal level. Trillions of dollars in deals during those 3 plus years. But as soon as its election time rolls around now its "Republicans wont work with us" ..."won’t do it for political reasons" falls strictly on one side? Letting texas defend the boarder would at least pretend democrats are finally interested in the problem..they cant even do that. So explain how this deal isnt political to the dems to get polls up on the issue That has been ignored and wont go back to that once the ballots are counted? ITS ALL POLITICAL. Only one has already proven to advocate and ignore it when in power. Edited January 26 by Buffarukus 1
LeviF Posted January 26 Posted January 26 (edited) On 1/24/2024 at 5:05 PM, Joe Ferguson forever said: oh, great! Can you decipher my username when you were active here? Please don't start stalling with recipes in conjunction with the other cons when you start losing a debate. other than that, en guarde! What are you and @DC Tom on about here anyway? Edited January 26 by LeviF Triple poast
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Just now, LeviF said: What are you and @DC Tom on about here anyway? What are you and @DC Tom on about here anyway? What are you and @DC Tom on about here anyway? he clearly rejected the gauntlet. we have battled before.
LeviF Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said: he clearly rejected the gauntlet. we have battled before. You caught my triple poast!
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 26 Posted January 26 (edited) 15 minutes ago, LeviF said: You caught my triple poast! Today the phrase “throw down the gauntlet” means to challenge or confront someone, but in its earliest use it wasn't meant as a metaphor, but was a physical action intended to issue a formal challenge to a duel. As I recall DC Tom was almost blind. It's a fair fight...He knows who I am. he's not here. come out, come out wherever you are...i suspect he was a top 3 of the cons. Edited January 26 by Joe Ferguson forever
Doc Posted January 26 Posted January 26 23 minutes ago, Buffarukus said: come on, they admit they wont do it for political reasons? so let me get this straight. 3 straight years of there is no problem. If there is, its a good thing! The more the merrier! Destroying barricades texas is setting up and taking them to court to do so. Liberal sanctuaries screaming stop, we cant take anymore. Its all republicans fault with ZERO response from the federal level. Trillions of dollars in deals during those 3 plus years. But as soon as its election time rolls around now its "Republicans wont work with us" ..."won’t do it for political reasons" falls strictly on one side? Letting texas defend the boarder would at least pretend democrats are finally interested in the problem..they cant even do that. So explain how this deal isnt political to the dems to get polls up on the issue That has been ignored and wont go back to that once the ballots are counted? ITS ALL POLITICAL. Only one has already proven to advocate and ignore it when in power. They told illegals to come and they'd be allowed in once Joke became President. They were counting on no one noticing/caring because they flew illegals all over the country under cover of darkness. But once DeSantis and Abbott started sending them to blue states/cities (called a "stunt" initially) and it started to take a toll on them, the problem began to get everyone's attention. To the point that polls began to reflect it, and it's only then that they decided they needed to at least pay lip service to it. But as you can see by their actions in Texas, they still won't do anything about it. The purpose was to increase Dem voters. If you've noticed, many cities are trying to allow illegals to vote. But what they want is to eventually grant citizenship to them. 3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Today the phrase “throw down the gauntlet” means to challenge or confront someone, but in its earliest use it wasn't meant as a metaphor, but was a physical action intended to issue a formal challenge to a duel. As I recall DC Tom was almost blind. It's a fair fight... For you, no, it's not.
DC Tom Posted January 26 Posted January 26 13 minutes ago, LeviF said: What are you and @DC Tom on about here anyway? Hmmm. A very well-earned Bat Signal. On 1/24/2024 at 5:05 PM, Joe Ferguson forever said: oh, great! Can you decipher my username when you were active here? Please don't start stalling with recipes in conjunction with the other cons when you start losing a debate. other than that, en guarde! Y'know, I've been accused of many things in my life. Theft, rape, murder, communism, Nazism, Republicanism, being a Democrat. General pedantic supercilious anal orifice-ness. But this is the first I've ever been accused of the inappropriate discussion of meal preparation instructions. You're a ***** idiot. 2
Recommended Posts