BillStime Posted January 28 Author Posted January 28 2 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: oh, cultural marxist then. a new term made up by the fascist losers. please link a definition. you self written one will surely be indecipherable. Joe, she real mad tonight. She keeps getting more and more desperate and pathetic. Poor thing. Keep in mind - she could post this crap ATOP but she doesn't get the same high in a circle jerk with @deranged rhino, @Foxx, @Buffalo_Gal, etc. She gets her validation here... just like this: 1
LeviF Posted January 28 Posted January 28 17 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: yes, communism doesn't exist in a capitalistic society. they are mutually exclusive ideologies. oligarchs, yes. capitalists running things, no. and they are, right here, right now in the good ol USA... pls explain your statement. seems like you're more aligned w Marx than you know: Karl Marx, the 19th century father of communism, was outraged by the growing gap between rich and poor. He saw capitalism as an outmoded economic system that exploited workers, which would eventually rise against the rich because the poor were so unfairly treated. Marx thought that the economic system of communism would replace capitalism. Communism is based on principles meant to correct the problems caused by capitalism. https://www.ushistory.org/gov/13b.asp Again, we’re not speaking the same language. You are under the mistaken impression that communism is some kind of economic theory. Even if Marx really proposed it as such, which I do not concede, it has never existed as such. 1 2 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 28 Posted January 28 (edited) 4 minutes ago, LeviF said: Again, we’re not speaking the same language. You are under the mistaken impression that communism is some kind of economic theory. Even if Marx really proposed it as such, which I do not concede, it has never existed as such. of course you don't concede it. it destroys your argument. here's another link establishing my point. now you. have you read Marx? His key theories were a critique of capitalism and its shortcomings. Marx thought that the capitalistic system would inevitably destroy itself. The oppressed workers would become alienated and ultimately overthrow the owners to take control of the means of production themselves, ushering in a classless society. Karl Marx: His Books, Theories, and Impact - Investopedia Marx could still be correct, through dummies like you and NC who think the grass is greener on some other side. Good luck with that... Edited January 28 by Joe Ferguson forever 1
LeviF Posted January 28 Posted January 28 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: of course you don't concede it. it destroys your argument. here's another link establishing my point. now you. have you read Marx? His key theories were a critique of capitalism and its shortcomings. Marx thought that the capitalistic system would inevitably destroy itself. The oppressed workers would become alienated and ultimately overthrow the owners to take control of the means of production themselves, ushering in a classless society. Karl Marx: His Books, Theories, and Impact - Investopedia Yeah. Like, the original writings. And not just the manifesto and Das Kapital. Give it a try. There’s a reason why Leninism is well within the confines of Marxism. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 28 Posted January 28 Just now, LeviF said: Yeah. Like, the original writings. And not just the manifesto and Das Kapital. Give it a try. There’s a reason why Leninism is well within the confines of Marxism. i read them too. along with plato, aristotle, neitsche, hobbes etc. Marx actually seemed reasonable in that oppressed people will revolt. i don't think working class Americans are oppressed however and will fold like cheap suits when it comes to actual revolution. I'm sure you want to prove me wrong... 1
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 29 Posted January 29 Apartheid Clyde doesn't want free speech. Just the freedom to push conspiracy and lies that he likes. 1
Tommy Callahan Posted January 29 Posted January 29 14 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Apartheid Clyde doesn't want free speech. Just the freedom to push conspiracy and lies that he likes. Freedom of speech doesn't protect what we agree with, it protects what we don't agree with. And if a liar, everyone sees the evidence that person is a liar, and they then have no integrity. that's on them. and similar to the farm in here.
BillsFanNC Posted February 1 Posted February 1 https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1753069396606754837?t=Aa8lzlRqh40pV_SqNbkOPA&s=19
BillStime Posted February 19 Author Posted February 19 Why doesn't Elon want this tweet shared? Who is he protecting? https://x.com/bettybowers/status/1759266868718670330?s=46&t=NQbN0P3SaWomL8RtLYMMbw
BillStime Posted February 25 Author Posted February 25 Can’t imagine why Elon doesn’t want you to see this https://x.com/scott2519733801/status/1761581255085191444?s=46
BillStime Posted February 25 Author Posted February 25 5 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: So glad you brought this up in THIS thread - lmao - 40% of the voters in South Carolina did not vote for this:
BillStime Posted March 2 Author Posted March 2 Why doesn’t Elon want you seeing this? https://x.com/moleek22/status/1764046406635929904?s=46
BillsFanNC Posted March 30 Posted March 30 https://twitter.com/DogRightGirl/status/1774092513143349250?t=ZWv7K50ElVEJyrSPeUDq0g&s=19
4th&long Posted March 30 Posted March 30 On 1/21/2024 at 10:56 AM, BillStime said: https://x.com/DutytoInform/status/1749084449688482193?s=20 We all knew this. That was obvious. That is why all his followers are nuts. 1
BillsFanNC Posted March 31 Posted March 31 https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1774533135553716460?t=xv1POsjInSrEcV1UK9IOOA&s=19
BillStime Posted April 19 Author Posted April 19 Anyone surprised Elon doesn’t want this tweet shared? https://x.com/bettybowers/status/1781470426859704646?s=46
Recommended Posts