Tommy Callahan Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) you have bad data. in 2016. 180K people voted in the Iowa Caucus. trump came in second in the first round. in 2024, 110K people voted in the Iowa Caucus. Trump came in first. https://www.nytimes.com/elections/2016/results/primaries/iowa https://www.politico.com/2024-election/results/iowa/ Edited January 17 by Tommy Callahan
BillStime Posted January 16 Posted January 16 7 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: you have bad data. in 2016. 180K people voted in the Iowa Caucus. trump came in second in the first round. in 2024, 110K people voted in the Iowa Caucus. Trump came in first. https://www.nytimes.com/elections/2016/results/primaries/iowa https://www.politico.com/2024-election/results/iowa/ you could google the BS you get from those shady sites before posting it to prevent everyone from reading how wrong you are. Fair enough. Still concerning.
B-Man Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Trump's Iowa landslide sees him win 98 out of 99 counties in drubbing that leaves rivals DeSantis and Haley trailing https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12968113/Trumps-Iowa-landslide-sees-win-98-99-counties-drubbing-leaves-rivals-DeSantis-Haley-trailing-does-mean-weeks-New-Hampshire-primary.html 1 1
Tommy Callahan Posted January 16 Posted January 16 5 minutes ago, B-Man said: Trump's Iowa landslide sees him win 98 out of 99 counties in drubbing that leaves rivals DeSantis and Haley trailing https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12968113/Trumps-Iowa-landslide-sees-win-98-99-counties-drubbing-leaves-rivals-DeSantis-Haley-trailing-does-mean-weeks-New-Hampshire-primary.html I don't think they really understand. They started this post as some kind of win to show trumps agenda doesn't have support. 1
B-Man Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) OPERATION CHAOS 2024 FAILS: Nikki Haley Flounders In Iowa Despite Democrats’ Best Efforts To Meddle On Her Behalf. Democrats’ shady efforts to propel Nikki Haley to victory in Iowa’s Republican caucus failed miserably after former President Donald Trump was projected the winner of the contest early Monday evening. In the days leading up to this week’s caucus, legacy media outlets ran articles suggesting Democrats and left-leaning independents would switch their party registrations to “Republican” in order to vote for the former South Carolina governor. On Saturday, The New York Times noted how these voters seem to be “drawn to Ms. Haley because they see her as a more moderate Republican candidate” and how “some Democratic voters said they preferred her even over Mr. Biden.” https://thefederalist.com/2024/01/15/nikki-haley-flounders-in-iowa-despite-democrats-best-efforts-to-meddle-on-her-behalf/ . Edited January 16 by B-Man 1
The Frankish Reich Posted January 16 Posted January 16 And so we are right back where we were in 2016, except ever more so. Trump, despite the power of "incumbency" ("I've won twice already!") still hovers at around 50% support in his own party, yet that party seems powerless to coalesce around a candidate more acceptable to the majority of Americans. Ron DeSantis, meet Scott Walker. Nikki Haley, have a cup of coffee with Carly Fiorina.
Tommy Callahan Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) 2 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: And so we are right back where we were in 2016, except ever more so. Trump, despite the power of "incumbency" ("I've won twice already!") still hovers at around 50% support in his own party, yet that party seems powerless to coalesce around a candidate more acceptable to the majority of Americans. Ron DeSantis, meet Scott Walker. Nikki Haley, have a cup of coffee with Carly Fiorina. Cruze won the Iowa caucus in 2016. And it wasn't 99 districts, to 1 either. Edited January 16 by Tommy Callahan 1
B-Man Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Trump’s Historic Iowa Win Causes MSNBC Host to Completely Implode. If there is one thing that’s always entertaining, it’s the liberal host seething and fighting back tears while putting on a calm and composed face for the audience. Everyone at MSNBC was ripping shots and popping pills in between commercial breaks. Donald Trump won the Iowa Caucuses by the widest margin in history, 30 points, and clinching over 50 percent of the vote. The GOP base is riding with Trump, and this momentum is sure to carry into New Hampshire, which, despite propaganda by Nikki Haley’s camp, is also Trump country. https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2024/01/16/media-reaction-trump-iowa-caucuses-n2633664 1
The Frankish Reich Posted January 16 Posted January 16 3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: He sounds almost giddy for a guy who "hates Trump passionately." It's almost as if he knows what side his bread is buttered on ... 1
Tommy Callahan Posted January 16 Posted January 16 9 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: lmao. Wasn't it the Scottish/northern British coast? Lindisfarne and what not?
Tiberius Posted January 16 Posted January 16 No enthusiasm at all on Republican side. Just not proud of what their party has become
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 16 Posted January 16 5 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said: Why yes. You both are. But way to low of an IQ to grasp it Lol! Ad hominem alert!!!!! Love it when someone calls someone else dumb and makes a 3rd grade grammar error. 1
The Frankish Reich Posted January 16 Posted January 16 2 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Lol! Ad hominem alert!!!!! Love it when someone calls someone else dumb and makes a 3rd grade grammar error. Yep. I get it, typing fast on a phone, etc. But those would be the ones to spell/grammar check ...
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 16 Posted January 16 2 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: He sounds almost giddy for a guy who "hates Trump passionately." It's almost as if he knows what side his bread is buttered on ... They don't even care if it's a grift! He says things they like so it gets copy/pasted everywhere. Even more embarrassing are their Twitter sources- people like Julie Kelly are the least harmful. And she is beyond clueless. 2 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Yep. I get it, typing fast on a phone, etc. But those would be the ones to spell/grammar check ... Listen if you're calling someone dumb.....best double check no? I mean incels have other problems I know but come on.
The Frankish Reich Posted January 16 Posted January 16 1 minute ago, L Ron Burgundy said: They don't even care if it's a grift! He says things they like so it gets copy/pasted everywhere. Even more embarrassing are their Twitter sources- people like Julie Kelly are the least harmful. And she is beyond clueless. True. It's almost as if he never said he hates Trump. All is forgiven. He feeds them what they want to hear.
Orlando Buffalo Posted January 17 Posted January 17 9 hours ago, Tiberius said: About two-thirds of voters wrongly believe President Biden wasn’t legitimately elected in 2020. That’s similar to where the GOP has been in national polls. But also consider this: Fewer than 1 in 10 Trump voters said Biden’s win was legitimate. Trump’s baseless claim pervades the party, but it defines his most devoted base. You are stating 2/3 of all voters, which means that about 40% of Biden voters think the election was questionable. Amazing you keep saying baseless but 40% of people that did not vote for him believe it. 1
reddogblitz Posted January 17 Posted January 17 18 hours ago, BillStime said: 80% of success is showing up.
reddogblitz Posted January 17 Posted January 17 How come Nikki Haley is running around saying this proved its a 2 person race when she came on 3rd?
Recommended Posts