Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 949
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Are the Packers definitive proof that developing a QB from the bench for at least a year is the best possible scenario? It's now 3 QBs in a row they've done that with and it just keep working.

Posted
Just now, BeavercreekBillsFan said:

Would be for the other 31 franchises. But the Niners have the best coach in the sport and managed to also get CMC for next to nothing.  While that lance trade was awful, I’m sure they’ll care very little as they’re cruising to the Super Bowl and hoisting the trophy after a blowout win. 

Well having the best coach in the sport is as of now a stretch but certainly possible. The Boys I think felt great going into the game today as well. Shanny blew it as OC with ATL and is 0-1 in SB. They have some work to do before they hoist the Lombardi. Image if they effectively used that once in a lifetime draft choice better? Good luck to your niners 👍

Posted
6 minutes ago, SirAndrew said:

Why are they talking up Dan Quinn? 

 

‘ Cuz he’s coaching a team with 9 all-pro players that just gave up 48 points to a QB playing in his first season/playoff game?

 

I got nothin’ for ya

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, HappyDays said:

Are the Packers definitive proof that developing a QB from the bench for at least a year is the best possible scenario? It's now 3 QBs in a row they've done that with and it just keep working.

 

Not sure.  You have Stroud who shines right away and Josh who struggled in the fire the first season but ultimately it was probably the best thing for him.  But on the whole you are probably right.  Most franchises would be better off with a lot of Packer philosophy.

Posted
2 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

Are the Packers definitive proof that developing a QB from the bench for at least a year is the best possible scenario? It's now 3 QBs in a row they've done that with and it just keep working.

 

Worked pretty well for Mahomes too.  Just sayin’.

 

Course it works best if you have a pretty solid team that is used to winning around him.

Posted
2 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

Are the Packers definitive proof that developing a QB from the bench for at least a year is the best possible scenario? It's now 3 QBs in a row they've done that with and it just keep working.


Imagine if Kolb never slips on that mat. EJ could have been more than just an elite hard count QB.

Posted
Just now, SageAgainstTheMachine said:

 

Not sure.  You have Stroud who shines right away and Josh who struggled in the fire the first season but ultimately it was probably the best thing for him.  But on the whole you are probably right.  Most franchises would be better off with a lot of Packer philosophy.

Most teams don't have the luxury of drafting a QB when they have a QB solidified. Almost all 1st round picks play as rookies now. Don't forget the Love pick was lambasted by the media saying they needed to get weapons for Rodgers.

Posted
Just now, davefan66 said:

Why go prevent?  Go with the defense you’ve been beating them with!


Because there isn’t enough time for the Cowboys to score enough points to come back unless they get many big plays.

 

Prevent “prevents” big plays.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...