Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, boyst said:

Then he needs to do one of two things for Kimmel...

1) fire him

2) make him funny 

It's well known that Kimmell associates with all of the Hollywood elite, as some would say the cabal of Hollywood.

 

That whole house of celebrity could be in trouble if all the names came out.

 

This is no different than Kimmel saying Rodgers gets high, etc. 

 

It's just two idiots running their mouth.

 

Actually, no. It's not well known. You are the first person to suggest it. In fact Jimmy's rep is more family man than party animal. It's his job to shmooze Hollywood types. Curious of the use of "Some would say..." and "Cabal."  Who's the "some?" You obviously. And there is no pleasant meaning to the word cabal.  So just from your response here, it's obvious to me that you believe Rogers insinuation, and you want to bolster your argument by citing the vague "some would say" and "cabal."

 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, boyst said:

It's well known that Kimmell associates with all of the Hollywood elite, as some would say the cabal of Hollywood.

 

That whole house of celebrity could be in trouble if all the names came out.

Flush this bs to ppp.

  • Agree 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, boyst said:

How? He didn't directly accuse Kimmel of being on Epsteins island. He didn't directly say Kimmel did anything illegal or wrong. And Epstein was never found guilty putting another spin on what was going on...

 

He led a line of statements which can be subject to opinions. 100% free speech. 

 

15 minutes ago, boyst said:

Then he needs to do one of two things for Kimmel...

1) fire him

2) make him funny 

It's well known that Kimmell associates with all of the Hollywood elite, as some would say the cabal of Hollywood.

 

That whole house of celebrity could be in trouble if all the names came out.

 

This is no different than Kimmel saying Rodgers gets high, etc. 

 

It's just two idiots running their mouth.

Better loosen your tinfoil hat…seems a bit tight.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, boyst said:

I don't like either. I took it as him saying Kimmel's friends and associates who he rubs elbows with are all deep in the Epstein stuff.

 

I don't care what he said or if it's true but if Kimmell can go on TV and make fun of people then get butthurt when it's thrown back on him he needs to leave his job. Dude threatened legal action. He's a comic. He's supposed to be funny, he's not supposed to be a joke.

Do you really not know how crazy people are?? They hear it from Rodgers and they will think it’s true. Even if it’s .01% of people that’s still dozens if not hundreds that will preach Kimmel is a pedo because they heard a QB said it. I’m GLAD Kimmel destroyed Rogers. 
 

Did anyone notice who was laughing it up with Jeffrey watching young girls dancing? 🤔 

Edited by Breakout Squad
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

"I didn't say that"  is no different than his pedantics around "inoculated". 

Rodgers is basically a kid pointing in your face going "I'm not touching you". 

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
37 minutes ago, boyst said:

He's too loud and too much of a production. Skip the theatrics and talk the sport. Steven a Smith, McAfee, all of them make me cringe. They're the Jim Kramer of sports world. 

 

I totally agree with the others like Stephen A Smith, but I find Pat much more fun, authentic, straight shooter.  Skip and all those other fools are all just fake laughs, fake rage, scripted arguments, and beyond stupid takes for the sake or creating "he said what" moments and bickering.  

 

Pat and the crew just are more straight shooters and talk sports like we talk sports with friends kind of dudes.  At least for me, but like anything, everyone has their own tastes and opinions.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, boyst said:

I don't know what this is about or care

 

McAfee is so douchey. If this has anything with Rodgers supposedly saying that Kimmel was on Epsteins island then it's shame. He never flipping said that and it was just construed.

 

Pathetic 

 

I mean he didn't say it. But he definitely inferred it. 

  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted

For anybody who didn't or doesn't listen to PM, Rodgers one hour segment was almost entirely dedicated to Aarons thoughts about Covid, Epstein, "The Media", etc. It was much more than the 10 minute clip. 

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

I feel like several in this thread and elsewhere are missing the forest for the trees.

It's not about the specifics of what Rodgers did or didn't say. What he did or didn't infer.

It's about the fact that this whole interaction has resulted to ESPN -- a sports network -- devoting increasing amount of time on its airwaves to discussion of Jeffrey Epstein, anti-vax conspiracy theories, UFOs, and the petty bickering between two petty men. 

The entire network has recently been overshadowed by the sophomoric culture war debate between Rodgers and Kimmel. The Pat McAfee show and the network that airs it have become little more than the wrestling ring in which two giant egos are squaring off. It's silly, it's unproductive, and it's not good for business.

Regardless of which side of the argument you're on -- and it is a silly, thinly verbally veiled, dog whistle filled, culture war argument -- the bottom line is that the Pat McAfee show and ESPN each had to do what was best for business. Period.

Edited by Logic
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
27 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

Flush this bs to ppp.

Why? It's. Or political. Just because it's Kimmel vs Rodgers... It's like giant turd vs douche

29 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

Actually, no. It's not well known. You are the first person to suggest it. In fact Jimmy's rep is more family man than party animal. It's his job to shmooze Hollywood types. Curious of the use of "Some would say..." and "Cabal."  Who's the "some?" You obviously. And there is no pleasant meaning to the word cabal.  So just from your response here, it's obvious to me that you believe Rogers insinuation, and you want to bolster your argument by citing the vague "some would say" and "cabal."

 

 

I don't use the word cabal. But the Hollywood group is tight knit and Kimmel himself has talked about his big parties often on Stern. He and the scrubs dude, among others host lavish parties. 

23 minutes ago, Fallser said:

 

Better loosen your tinfoil hat…seems a bit tight.

Uh. Cool?

8 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I mean he didn't say it. But he definitely inferred it. 

Which is 100% legal. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 2
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, teef said:

it's amazing how invested some people are in this.  let it go for god's sake.

I'm at the doctor's office between two visits. Lots of time, sadly. I never expected people to give this much of a rats ass. 🤯

Edited by boyst
Posted
41 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

It's pry the best for the Jets if Rodgers just stays off talk shows until he retires.  Of course he won't so the circus will continue.

Why in the world were they talking about that to begin with on a sports talk show?

Because Kimmel who has a son that's immune-compromised railed Rogers during the whole vaccine thing and Rogers is a petty douchebag and believes stupid things on the internet including easily faked leaked lists.

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted
1 minute ago, boyst said:

 

Which is 100% legal. 

 

It wouldn't be in the UK. If a court held that a reasonable person was like to interpret it way. But your defamation laws are much more laissez faire so maybe it would be over there. 

 

But even if it is legal it doesn't make it the right thing to do. 

 

Rodgers is a ####### though. I have always thought that about him, however great he was.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
5 minutes ago, boyst said:

 

Which is amazing to consider the ramifications on Kimmels show for the statements he makes, if you think about it. 

 

I am not familiar with his work beyond the odd short that pops up on youtube. But I am familiar with Rodgers' bullsh*t. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
7 minutes ago, boyst said:

Well, Kimmell chose a target who punched back. Big whoop.

 

Opinions like either has mean nothing in show business. They're just ratings to them. 

Yeah Rogers got made fun of for something he did do, so in response years later with no actual evidence he implies Kimmel is a pedophile. Yeah what a stand up guy.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, boyst said:

I'm at the doctor's office between two visits. Lots of time, sadly. I never expected people to give this much of a rats ass. 🤯

not for nothing boyst, but you seem to care the most.  i honestly thought it all fabricated, but the entire thing has taken a  strange turn.

Posted
44 minutes ago, Breakout Squad said:

Do you really not know how crazy people are?? They hear it from Rodgers and they will think it’s true. Even if it’s .01% of people that’s still dozens if not hundreds that will preach Kimmel is a pedo because they heard a QB said it. I’m GLAD Kimmel destroyed Rogers. 
 

Did anyone notice who was laughing it up with Jeffrey watching young girls dancing? 🤔 

Kimmel?

Posted

TO MODS: May have already been said (not reading through 4 pages of a TMZ worthy topic) but how is this any less wall worthy than

"Wyatt Teller's wife dishes on her difficult, non-working life"  ??????

  • Haha (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...