Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

Josh was able to throw the ball in that game, they didn't do it until they had no choice and then it was like oh I guess he could have done it after all.

15/30 and 50% is hardly ok.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Dillenger4 said:

The Steelers have a better D than Miami. Miami was "injured" last night and they gave us fits at times. I expect this playoff game to be a barn burner, low scoring game. Our main issue is Cook. He can't run up the middle vs good, beefy D lines like last night, like vs NE and the Steelers have a great line. Ty Johnson is most likely out - so it will be Cook, Lenny and Murray. That scares me.

Hope for Josh runs being effective and short passes to Diggs/Shakir/Kincaid. Steelers are no joke boys....

Pitts D took a huge hit losing Watt.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
20 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

 

23 of that 37 were against the Browning-led slumping Bengals in a home game though.  

 

Other than that they played a mediocre Seattle team and the Ravens JV team with Huntley.  The Seahawks and Bengals rank 25th and 21st in scoring D.  We rank 4th.  

 

Either way, make of it what you will.  The point is that historically on this season they're not a great team.  They barely edged the 9-8 Bengals, Jags, and Colts to log that 7th seed.   

 

The matchup seems to favor them however, the cold snowy weather in high winds.  They do seem to have a good secondary so there may not be much wiggle room for error on Allen's part, and if it comes down to which team runs the ball better, Cook who's averaged 3.6 YPC under Brady except against Dallas or Harris/Warren who are bigger backs, given that our rushing D is our weakness, it may be problematic.  

 

 

 

We add a running QB and Fournette and Murray for some additional oomph though.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, LABILLBACKER said:

15/30 and 50% is hardly ok.

Yeah obviously it makes it worse, but he can still do it, deep balls are ***** gone anything your lofting is getting carried who knows where.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

Please Buffalo, let me have a nice comfortable Sunday afternoon.  Let my anxiety build up for the divisional round.

Living in Erie I just wanna stomp these guys. All these Piglet fans here are saying they got these best possible matchup they could ask for. Very annoying people.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

You do realize the wind doesn't care how strong your arm is. It's going to blow the ball off course to some degree. Especially with how the wind swirls at Highmark.  For this particular game if it is 20-25, you gotta run and be willing to checkdown to pass plays under 10 yards.

I mean I think you’re saying the wind does care by adding ‘to some degree’ at the end of that lol  a weaker armed qbs ball is getting blown off course much much more than a strong armed qb.

josh plays worse in bad weather it’s no surprise at all but that doesn’t mean the other guy he’s up against in that weather doesn’t play even worse than their normal compared to josh vs his normal.  He also runs like a fullback which makes bad weather tilt games his way too. 
 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Pokebball said:

Pitts D took a huge hit losing Watt.

Yes, but so did Miami's D losing Chubb, Phillips and Howard last night as well as a few DB's during the game. Didn't seem to matter as they gave us fits. We got the W, but all I am saying is Pitt has a beter D than Miami. They also have top 3 OL in the NFL. We need to be ready! We will be... but it's not a gimme game just because Watt is out.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Dillenger4 said:

The Steelers have a better D than Miami. Miami was "injured" last night and they gave us fits at times. I expect this playoff game to be a barn burner, low scoring game. Our main issue is Cook. He can't run up the middle vs good, beefy D lines like last night, like vs NE and the Steelers have a great line. Ty Johnson is most likely out - so it will be Cook, Lenny and Murray. That scares me.

Hope for Josh runs being effective and short passes to Diggs/Shakir/Kincaid. Steelers are no joke boys....

 

JJ Watt has been their entire D (stat wise).  His 19 sacks, 36 QB hits, 19 TFL, 4 FF, 1 INT, 1 TD plus tackles and passes defended have

been amazing!  Also having him on the field allows the remaining D to outperform.  His loss is HUGE.

Double team Highsmith in this game would seem the way to go.

 

Compare his D stats with the rest of the Steelers D.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/pit/2023.htm

  • Disagree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

You do realize the wind doesn't care how strong your arm is. It's going to blow the ball off course to some degree. Especially with how the wind swirls at Highmark.  For this particular game if it is 20-25, you gotta run and be willing to checkdown to pass plays under 10 yards.

It kinda does. It also cares how tight your spiral is. 20mph wind isn't that bad. Especially if it's steady. If it's gusty and unpredictable that's harder.

 

This will likely be one of those games where the team who can score going into the wind will dictate the game. I'll take Josh going into the wind thx.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Dillenger4 said:

Yes, but so did Miami's D losing Chubb, Phillips and Howard last night as well as a few DB's during the game. Didn't seem to matter as they gave us fits. We got the W, but all I am saying is Pitt has a beter D than Miami. They also have top 3 OL in the NFL. We need to be ready! We will be... but it's not a gimme game just because Watt is out.

Not really the Bills punted once the whole game. The issue with the Bills is Josh’s issues with Gabe Davis and Cyrus Torrence forgetting that Christian Wilkins needed to be blocked  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

15/30 and 50% is hardly ok.


I can’t stand when people claim the wind helps us, since our QB has a better arm.  If our QB has a better arm is zero wind, that advantage lessens as there is more wind.  Using an extreme example, if the winds were 100 mph, neither QB would be able throw the ball forward, and both teams would be forced to run only.  Any wind starts to eat into the advantage of the stronger armed QB.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Dillenger4 said:

Yes, but so did Miami's D losing Chubb, Phillips and Howard last night as well as a few DB's during the game. Didn't seem to matter as they gave us fits. We got the W, but all I am saying is Pitt has a beter D than Miami. They also have top 3 OL in the NFL. We need to be ready! We will be... but it's not a gimme game just because Watt is out.

And if the Bills just took the FGs they'd have scored 33 on Miami.

 

I wouldn't say they gave us fits. We moved the ball pretty comfortably most of the night.

 

No game is a gimmie, especially this time of year, but I like our chances a lot. With or without Watt.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Generic_Bills_Fan said:

I mean I think you’re saying the wind does care by adding ‘to some degree’ at the end of that lol  a weaker armed qbs ball is getting blown off course much much more than a strong armed qb.

josh plays worse in bad weather it’s no surprise at all but that doesn’t mean the other guy he’s up against in that weather doesn’t play even worse than their normal compared to josh vs his normal.  He also runs like a fullback which makes bad weather tilt games his way too. 
 

I don't care about the other guy. I'll let McDermott dial up a good defensive strategy.  I do care about somehow reducing these incessant turnovers.  3 more last night with no wind. It's well documented Josh doesn't do that well in poor weather conditions.  I'm just saying tone down the deep throws some if the wind is above 20.  A 50% completion ratio doesn't get me excited regardless of his cannon.  Fix Cook's recent struggles. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Dillenger4 said:

Yes, but so did Miami's D losing Chubb, Phillips and Howard last night as well as a few DB's during the game. Didn't seem to matter as they gave us fits. We got the W, but all I am saying is Pitt has a beter D than Miami. They also have top 3 OL in the NFL. We need to be ready! We will be... but it's not a gimme game just because Watt is out.

Watt means more to the Steelers than all those guys combined mean to the dolphins…if people cared about defense when they handed out awards he’d be the mvp every year lol 

 

the dolphins d didn’t give us fits we gave ourselves fits with terrible execution once we hit the Miami 35 yard line…we marched up and down the field on them all night.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, DapperCam said:

 

 

Run the ball well, hit some intermediate routes. Don’t turn it over, and trust your defense to stop Mason Rudolph in bad weather.

 

Change Rudolph to Allen and you have Tomlin’s opening remarks this week.

  • Dislike 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, strive_for_five_guy said:


I can’t stand when people claim the wind helps us, since our QB has a better arm.  If our QB has a better arm is zero wind, that advantage lessens as there is more wind.  Using an extreme example, if the winds were 100 mph, neither QB would be able throw the ball forward, and both teams would be forced to run only.  Any wind starts to eat into the advantage of the stronger armed QB.

Yes, but the marginal difference is where. The game lies. The wind doesn't blow 100mph, it's going to be 20-25 and it's going to impact Rudolph or Pickett more than Allen. We've all seen noodle armed QBs try to play here when it's windy. Sometimes they were ours.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Bferra13 said:

Living in Erie I just wanna stomp these guys. All these Piglet fans here are saying they got these best possible matchup they could ask for. Very annoying people.

 

My brother is a Steelers fan and the loser of this game has to adopt a 10 foot anaconda and have to feed it bunny rabbits in front of our kids.

  • Shocked 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, LABILLBACKER said:

I don't care about the other guy. I'll let McDermott dial up a good defensive strategy.  I do care about somehow reducing these incessant turnovers.  3 more last night with no wind. It's well documented Josh doesn't do that well in poor weather conditions.  I'm just saying tone down the deep throws some if the wind is above 20.  A 50% completion ratio doesn't get me excited regardless of his cannon.  Fix Cook's recent struggles. 

These weather talks always make me chuckle lol josh is literally the prototypical bad weather qb and I don’t even think it’s really debatable.  You’re worried because his stats get worse in bad weather and won’t even consider what that weather is doing to qbs that can’t throw 60 yard ropes or run like a fullback? 
 

the turnover points I totally agree with obviously but my response was to ‘the wind doesn’t care if you have a strong arm’ lol the wind absolutely cares 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...