Head coach carousel 2024 edition

[DrDawkinstein]

10 hours ago, djp14150 said:

Goff and Mayfield are in the playoffs.

 

the Bears started 0-4.

only 3 games were true loses. Early gb, at kc, at chargers.

 

they went 7-7 after first 3 games

In 3 of those loses loses ( in 7-7 stretch) they had 9+ pt 4th quarter leads 

tied in 4th with another. Other 3 were one score down in the 4th

confidence is a dangerous thing in the nfl.

 

They held onto one of those 3 blown 4th quarter games then they are going into the packers game tied at 8-8 and likely a winner gets the WC spot game.

 

 

If the Bears trade away Fields and pass up MHJ only to end up with another Mayfield/Goff out of this #1 pick then it's a disaster.

 

As far as 4th quarter leads go, sounds like they also need to invest in Defense. Maybe get a new MLB.

[TheFunPolice]

Rooney Rule question: I was reading that now you must interview TWO external minority candidates for a HC job. 

 

Does that mean the Raiders couldn't just name Antonio Pierce the permanent HC if they wanted to?

Edited January 11 by TheFunPolice

[FireChans]

10 hours ago, djp14150 said:

Goff and Mayfield are in the playoffs.

 

the Bears started 0-4.

only 3 games were true loses. Early gb, at kc, at chargers.

 

they went 7-7 after first 3 games

In 3 of those loses loses ( in 7-7 stretch) they had 9+ pt 4th quarter leads 

tied in 4th with another. Other 3 were one score down in the 4th

confidence is a dangerous thing in the nfl.

 

They held onto one of those 3 blown 4th quarter games then they are going into the packers game tied at 8-8 and likely a winner gets the WC spot game.

 

The Bears would trade Fields for Goff in a heartbeat. Fields and Baker are probably closer to a push, but not because of Fields’ ability today, but because he’s still relatively young and may get better.

4 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

If the Bears trade away Fields and pass up MHJ only to end up with another Mayfield/Goff out of this #1 pick then it's a disaster.

 

As far as 4th quarter leads go, sounds like they also need to invest in Defense. Maybe get a new MLB.

If you fail swinging for a QB, at least it demonstrates your priorities are in order.

 

Trying to build a super team around a guy who can barely pass at the NFL level shows you’re a disaster from the top

[DrDawkinstein]

7 minutes ago, FireChans said:

If you fail swinging for a QB, at least it demonstrates your priorities are in order.

 

Trying to build a super team around a guy who can barely pass at the NFL level shows you’re a disaster from the top

 

In theory, yes. But in practice, over-drafting under qualified players #1 overall due to the position they play has bit teams more times than it has helped teams.

 

There is no Andrew Luck, Cam Newton, Joe Burrow in this draft. I'd argue there isnt even a Trevor Lawrence.

 

If I'm the Bears and I really want to move on from Fields, then I'm looking more at that #9 spot. Maybe Penix falls.

[Ridgewaycynic2013]

45 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Yes I believe they confirmed it before week 18.

 

33 minutes ago, The Jokeman said:

He got a vote of confidence late in the season, honestly as a Bills fan I hope they keep him. 

Johnson & Johnson will probably think it's time for the Jets to 'pull a Patriots'.  Make Saleh the team's GM as well.

16 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

In theory, yes. But in practice, over-drafting under qualified players #1 overall due to the position they play has bit teams more times than it has helped teams.

 

There is no Andrew Luck, Cam Newton, Joe Burrow in this draft. I'd argue there isnt even a Trevor Lawrence.

 

If I'm the Bears and I really want to move on from Fields, then I'm looking more at that #9 spot. Maybe Penix falls.

No matter what, a noisy minority here will find a way to blame Edmunds.

[Warcodered]

3 hours ago, x-BillzeBubba said:

 

The GM however will remain the same:

 

[DrDawkinstein]

21 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

The GM however will remain the same:

 

 

As dirty as it is to admit around here, this made me like Belichick even more. Classic.

[4merper4mer]

1 hour ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

If the Bears trade away Fields and pass up MHJ only to end up with another Mayfield/Goff out of this #1 pick then it's a disaster.

 

As far as 4th quarter leads go, sounds like they also need to invest in Defense. Maybe get a new MLB.

Ah the legend of MHJ grows.  If you’re going to take a receiver over a QB, why not take the one who will be a superior NFL player?   Nabers.

54 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

In theory, yes. But in practice, over-drafting under qualified players #1 overall due to the position they play has bit teams more times than it has helped teams.

 

There is no Andrew Luck, Cam Newton, Joe Burrow in this draft. I'd argue there isnt even a Trevor Lawrence.

 

If I'm the Bears and I really want to move on from Fields, then I'm looking more at that #9 spot. Maybe Penix falls.

Lol first MHJ now Andrew Luck.  You’re on a “media narrated greatness” roll.  Now do Tony Mandarich.

[FireChans]

1 hour ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

In theory, yes. But in practice, over-drafting under qualified players #1 overall due to the position they play has bit teams more times than it has helped teams.

 

There is no Andrew Luck, Cam Newton, Joe Burrow in this draft. I'd argue there isnt even a Trevor Lawrence.

 

If I'm the Bears and I really want to move on from Fields, then I'm looking more at that #9 spot. Maybe Penix falls.

Is there a Jared Goff? 
 

I wouldn’t mind it terribly if they didn’t love anyone or whatever and went with QB at 9. 
 

Doubling down on Fields and not taking a QB is franchise malpractice when you have two firsts in the top 10.

[GunnerBill]

19 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

Ah the legend of MHJ grows.  If you’re going to take a receiver over a QB, why not take the one who will be a superior NFL player?   Nabers.

 

 

I wouldn't take any receiver over a Quarterback as the Bears. That would be a mistake IMO. But really I wanted to comment on Nabers. I spent an hour or so on his film last night. My takeaways:

 

- he plays bigger than his size;

- his suddenness in his cuts and ability to hit the jets in the open field is special;

- he can run routes but doesn't actually have a particularly developed route tree at LSU;

- he has good hands.

 

However, there are two concerns (which possibly take you to the same place). I don't love his release package at the line against press man. His feet seem to get kind of stuck and he isn't the most physical. That might be why he played over half his snaps from the slot. Now I have been burned with LSU receivers who played mainly in the slot at college and went on the excel outside in the NFL - Justin Jefferson - but I do wonder a bit about whether Nabers will find himself limited to a lot of slot work. If you guaranteed me he was going to a Sean McVay or Kyle Shanahan I'd be will to guarantee you Nabers is going to be a star. If he ends up in something a bit more boring and vanilla I'm not as convinced. I provisionally gave him a top 10 grade based on the upside. But I think he is DEFINITELY more fit dependent than MHJ is. 

 

Edited January 12 by GunnerBill

[njbuff]

Over a foot of snow is predicted through Sunday night.

 

Would they move the game to Monday at 4pm (I wouldn’t)?

[Beck Water]

2 hours ago, TheFunPolice said:

Rooney Rule question: I was reading that now you must interview TWO external minority candidates for a HC job. 

 

Does that mean the Raiders couldn't just name Antonio Pierce the permanent HC if they wanted to?

 

Wiki says "no" but may be out of date:

 

Quote

The rule does not apply if an assistant coach has language in his contract guaranteeing him the head coaching job in case of an opening.[21] For example, this was the case when Mike Martz took over as head coach of the St. Louis Rams before the 2000 season. Also, the requirement does not apply if the assistant coach taking over the head position is a minority, as was the case with Mike Singletary and the San Francisco 49ers in late 2008.[22]

 

[bobobonators]

2 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

As dirty as it is to admit around here, this made me like Belichick even more. Classic.

That’s an epic pic. Forgot about it. 

[The Jokeman]

4 hours ago, TheFunPolice said:

Rooney Rule question: I was reading that now you must interview TWO external minority candidates for a HC job. 

 

Does that mean the Raiders couldn't just name Antonio Pierce the permanent HC if they wanted to?

He's interim so I think if change it to permanent they're okay since they not really replacing him.  

[Phils n Bills]

4 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

As dirty as it is to admit around here, this made me like Belichick even more. Classic.

Agreed, especially when compared to Kliff Kingsbury and his digs that night.  

[GunnerBill]

5 hours ago, FireChans said:

The Bears would trade Fields for Goff in a heartbeat.

 

Agree. Goff is a tad underrated. I think it is because he really struggled as a rookie and so people got this narrative that he sucks in their head and is always propped up by what is around him. But he is a solid middle of the pack QB. Not a star by any means, but a guy who can play realiably and run an offense. People throwing him in with Baker who couldn't stick on a bad team last year and Fields who struggles from the pocket is just wrong. 

[Big Turk]

7 hours ago, TheFunPolice said:

Rooney Rule question: I was reading that now you must interview TWO external minority candidates for a HC job. 

 

Does that mean the Raiders couldn't just name Antonio Pierce the permanent HC if they wanted to?

 

Wouldn't naming a minority as head coach override that considering he was already coaching the team?

 

Or is this the NFL's way of getting more candidates interviewing experience?

[Beck Water]

5 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Agree. Goff is a tad underrated. I think it is because he really struggled as a rookie and so people got this narrative that he sucks in their head and is always propped up by what is around him. But he is a solid middle of the pack QB. Not a star by any means, but a guy who can play realiably and run an offense. People throwing him in with Baker who couldn't stick on a bad team last year and Fields who struggles from the pocket is just wrong. 

 

Wait, I thought Baker was a good QB now at age 28?  All in the playoffs and everything?  64% completions, 4044 passing yards, 28 TD, only 10 INT, 238 ypg and all that.

[NeverOutNick]

My early predictions for coaching hires. This changes a bit if any playoff teams fire coaches.
 

Patriots - Mike Vrabel (easy)

Seattle - Dan Quinn (easier)

Washington - Harbaugh (near his bro in opposite conference with owners who have a lot of money and get to mold the new franchise QB, Drake Maye)

Chargers - Ben Johnson (they miss out on Harbaugh but get the next best offensive coach for Herbert)

Raiders - Antonio Pierce (easy)

Falcons - Bill Belichick (seems like the guy Blank would want)

Titans - Bobby Slowik (stealing a rival OC to help mold Levis)

Panthers - Ejiro Evero (who else besides Eric Bienemy are going to want this job)

[4merper4mer]

9 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I wouldn't take any receiver over a Quarterback as the Bears. That would be a mistake IMO. But really I wanted to comment on Nabers. I spent an hour or so on his film last night. My takeaways:

 

- he plays bigger than his size;

- his suddenness in his cuts and ability to hit the jets in the open field is special;

- he can run routes but doesn't actually have a particularly developed route tree at LSU;

- he has good hands.

 

However, there are two concerns (which possibly take you to the same place). I don't love his release package at the line against press man. His feet seem to get kind of stuck and he isn't the most physical. That might be why he played over half his slots from the slot. Now I have been burned with LSU receivers who played mainly in the slot at college and went on the excel outside in the NFL - Justin Jefferson - but I do wonder a bit about whether Nabers will find himself limited to a lot of slot work. If you guaranteed me he was going to a Sean McVay or Kyle Shanahan I'd be will to guarantee you Nabers is going to be a star. If he ends up in something a bit more boring and vanilla I'm not as convinced. I provisionally gave him a top 10 grade based on the upside. But I think he is DEFINITELY more fit dependent than MHJ is. 

 

IMO and based on what I’ve read in other places MHJ doesn’t always track the ball as well as he should and although that didn’t burn him in college, it may in the NFL.  Again, not in any way calling him a bad player or bust, just likely to not live up to his ultra high pick.

 

Im not sure I agree about kicking Fields to the curb.  It feels abrupt.  The Bears can move down a very small number of spots and pick up an absolute haul.  If they can’t make it work with Fields they will have mega ammo to try again in 2025.  No way should they stay at 1 and pick anything other than QB though….I agree about that.