Jump to content

Remove Divisions in NFL


Recommended Posts

Almost every year we see teams make the playoffs over another team with a better record, due to winning their division. Or we see teams just have a cakewalk to the playoffs/home field advantage bc they play in a trash division and have automatic 6 wins (Chiefs past few years/Pats for more than a decade). 
 

Remove the divisions. Keep AFC/NFC. Keep the same 18 week/17 game schedule every team plays every single team in their conference 1x and then do 2 games vs opposite conference every year to maintain some inter-conference rivalries alive. 
 

Removing the divisions and going with 2 conference automatically eliminates teams with worse records making it in over teams with better records, and it also eliminates schedule bias by forcing all teams to have the same schedule  (minus the 2 games vs opposite conference).

 

With 11/17 games being outside of your division, it doesn’t make sense to reward a team so much at playoff time for winning their division. 

 

Thoughts? 

 

 

Edited by bobobonators
  • Like (+1) 5
  • Vomit 4
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Sad 1
  • Disagree 9
  • Agree 2
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Dislike 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, artmalibu said:

Will a team with a loosing record make the playoffs this year?

I don’t think so; NFC South is worst division and winner will be 1 game over. Historically speaking, it has been an issue. 
 

Chiefs have also gotten home field advantage for Mahomes’ entire tenure (minus this year), in part, due to the AFC W being a disaster. 

1 minute ago, MJS said:

Every year, haha? It almost never happens that a team with a losing record makes the playoffs. It is rare.

To clarify, I meant one of the two things I said happens. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What will people have to complain about if this happens? People like to have sh-t to complain about…, 

 

GO BILLS!!!

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All fair points. 
 

My main motivation would be to reduce the amount of schedule bias, and to ensure a team won’t make the playoffs over a team who has a better record. Let alone get a home game in the playoffs over a team who had a better record. 

1 minute ago, KDIGGZ said:

Bills couldn't beat Jets or Pats. Division rivals. If they lose tomorrow they deserve to be out

This is not meant to be a pro Bills thread. Just speaking in general terms about the NFL playoff picture 

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The value of the divisional matchups and rivalry over time is more important than the seeding in my opinion. If they were to do away with division winners for seeding purposes, I would still prefer the scheduling of the games stay as it is now.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, bobobonators said:

Every year we see teams with losing records making the playoffs. Or we see teams just have a cakewalk to the playoffs bc they play in a TRASH division and have automatic 6 wins (Chiefs past few years). 
 

Remove the divisions. Keep AFC/NFC. Keep the same 18 week/17 game schedule every team plays every single team in their conference 1x and then do 2 games vs opposite conference every year to maintain some inter-conference rivalries alive. 
 

Removing the divisions and going with 2 conference automatically eliminates teams with losing records making it in over teams with winning records, and it also eliminates bias by forcing all teams to have the same schedule  (minus the 2 games vs opposite conference).

 

Thoughts? 

 

 

In NFL history, 6 teams have made the playoffs with a losing record. And 2 or those were in the 82 strike season. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I remember correctly there is a vote about conferences after the 2025 season. There has been some chatter about changing things

Ultimately, it won't get much attention until the cowboys miss the playoffs with 10 wins while the NFCS sends a 9-8 team in. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, bobobonators said:

Every year we see teams with losing records making the playoffs. Or we see teams just have a cakewalk to the playoffs bc they play in a TRASH division and have automatic 6 wins (Chiefs past few years). 
 

Remove the divisions. Keep AFC/NFC. Keep the same 18 week/17 game schedule every team plays every single team in their conference 1x and then do 2 games vs opposite conference every year to maintain some inter-conference rivalries alive. 
 

Removing the divisions and going with 2 conference automatically eliminates teams with losing records making it in over teams with winning records, and it also eliminates bias by forcing all teams to have the same schedule  (minus the 2 games vs opposite conference).

 

Thoughts? 

 

 

I dislike the idea. I like the fact a mediocre team could make it and make noise. Like the Seahawks did one year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MJS said:

Every year, haha? It almost never happens that a team with a losing record makes the playoffs. It is rare.

Maybe not a losing record but every season the NFC South sucks and the AFC south sucks. 11-6 teams or 10-7 teams should not lose playoff spots to 9-8 or 8-9 teams. It's stupid

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, bobobonators said:

Every year we see teams with losing records making the playoffs. Or we see teams just have a cakewalk to the playoffs bc they play in a TRASH division and have automatic 6 wins (Chiefs past few years). 
 

Remove the divisions. Keep AFC/NFC. Keep the same 18 week/17 game schedule every team plays every single team in their conference 1x and then do 2 games vs opposite conference every year to maintain some inter-conference rivalries alive. 
 

Removing the divisions and going with 2 conference automatically eliminates teams with losing records making it in over teams with winning records, and it also eliminates bias by forcing all teams to have the same schedule  (minus the 2 games vs opposite conference).

 

Thoughts? 

 

 

How about not losing to teams with losing records? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...