B-Man Posted January 6 Posted January 6 (edited) Not much to “hear”. The 14th amendment doesn’t apply here, NO ONE has been charged with insurrection. Let me know if anyone ever is. . Edited January 6 by B-Man 1 1 1 1 1
BillStime Posted January 6 Posted January 6 Just now, B-Man said: The 14th amendment doesn’t apply here, NO ONE hard been charged with insurrection. Where in the 14th Amendment does it say anything about being charged?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 6 Posted January 6 (edited) Just now, B-Man said: Comprehension problems again. no one cares. especially kavanaugh....uncle tom will not recuse. the world as we know it, with all it's graft and warts, goes on. no new game to learn. take my bet. non answer is concession of the inevitable. what odds u want? Edited January 6 by Joe Ferguson forever
BillStime Posted January 6 Posted January 6 5 minutes ago, B-Man said: Comprehension problems again. Yeah, that would be you, Bonnie. Post the text to the Fourteenth Amendment - Section 3 We all wait in anticipation. You can even plagiarize. 1
John from Riverside Posted January 6 Posted January 6 I’m not sure that he should be off the ballot anyway People should be allowed to vote for whoever they want and live with the consequences of it 1 1 2
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 6 Posted January 6 a more balanced piece: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/rcna132058 anything here u disagree w?
BillStime Posted January 6 Posted January 6 5 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: I’m not sure that he should be off the ballot anyway People should be allowed to vote for whoever they want and live with the consequences of it Then why have a constitution? Should Elon Musk or Josh Allen be allowed to run for the office of the presidency? 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 6 Posted January 6 Just now, BillStime said: Then why have a constitution? Should Elon Musk or Josh Allen be allowed to run for the office of the presidency? the trump appointees are supposed to be literalists. we'll see who really is.
T&C Posted January 6 Posted January 6 43 minutes ago, BillStime said: Then why have a constitution? Should Elon Musk or Josh Allen be allowed to run for the office of the presidency? Which Josh Allen? One of them yes, the other... no
John from Riverside Posted January 6 Posted January 6 (edited) 1 hour ago, BillStime said: Then why have a constitution? Should Elon Musk or Josh Allen be allowed to run for the office of the presidency? It just into the hole we’re not going to let Trump win by any means necessary thing I’m tired of their excuses I believe the American people will do the right thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I also think that I would feel much differently about this if he was actually convicted of one of these crimes right now he’s indicted I can’t believe I just said that now I need a bath Edited January 6 by John from Riverside
Pokebball Posted January 6 Posted January 6 18 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: It just into the hole we’re not going to let Trump win by any means necessary thing I’m tired of their excuses I believe the American people will do the right thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I also think that I would feel much differently about this if he was actually convicted of one of these crimes right now he’s indicted I can’t believe I just said that now I need a bath Until there's a conviction, it's a banana republic circus
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 6 Posted January 6 13 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: It just into the hole we’re not going to let Trump win by any means necessary thing I’m tired of their excuses I believe the American people will do the right thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I also think that I would feel much differently about this if he was actually convicted of one of these crimes right now he’s indicted I can’t believe I just said that now I need a bath Now you’re getting it, John. It’s the problem some people have with “…any means necessary”. It shouldn’t be that way, should it? You believe he should be on the ballot, yet don’t seem particularly perturbed by the fact that a small group of judges are trying to keep him from the ballot of a national election.
BillStime Posted January 6 Posted January 6 10 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Now you’re getting it, John. It’s the problem some people have with “…any means necessary”. It shouldn’t be that way, should it? You believe he should be on the ballot, yet don’t seem particularly perturbed by the fact that a small group of judges are trying to keep him from the ballot of a national election. F the constitution, right?
ChiGoose Posted January 6 Posted January 6 54 minutes ago, Pokebball said: Until there's a conviction, it's a banana republic circus Please point to where it requires a conviction.
BillStime Posted January 6 Posted January 6 8 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Please point to where it requires a conviction. We are still waiting for our resident plagiarist and constitutional scholar, @B-Man, to provide that information. Apparently it requires a specific comprehension. 1
ChiGoose Posted January 6 Posted January 6 Just now, BillStime said: We are still waiting for our resident plagiarist and constitutional scholar, @B-Man, to provide that information. Apparently it requires a specific comprehension. I wonder if it requires a conviction of being under 35 to keep someone off the ballot. Does someone need to be convicted of having not lived in the US long enough? Or convicted of being born elsewhere? 1
Recommended Posts