Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know, shocking, right?

 

The Peacock exclusive ratings are out. Overall the game had an average viewership of 7.2 million viewers. But of that number 1.12 million were from just the over the air simulcasts in Los Angeles and Buffalo.

 

Buffalo, TV market rank #54, has 632,110 TV households, 374,000 of which were tuned into the game. That's 59.2%.

 

Los Angeles, TV market rank #2, has 5,838,090 TV households, 746,000 of which were tuned into the game. That's 12.8%.

 

https://www.sportsmediawatch.com/2023/12/peacock-nfl-ratings-seven-million-bills-chargers-viewership/

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 5
Posted (edited)

When all of these teams were moving a few years back. St. Louis Rams to the LA Rams. The Oakland Raiders to the Vegas Raiders. The San Diego Chargers to the LA Chargers. If the league wanted two teams in LA (which isn't a great NFL market to begin with) then it should have been the Rams and Raiders in LA. The Rams have a long history in LA, and they do have a fanbase there. The Raiders also have some history in LA and also have a fanbase there. The Chargers have neither a history with LA nor a fanbase there. The Chargers would have been better off in Vegas and building a fanbase in that market as they would be the only team representing Vegas. Basically, starting over in the sin city.

Edited by Gregg
  • Like (+1) 8
  • Agree 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted

I miss the San Diego Team. We would do a guys trip once a year to go see a game and stay on the beach. Now they moved and ruined that for us. I used to not care for them, now I dislike them. 

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Agree 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Limeaid said:

Time to move the Chargers someplace else who will appreciate them and pay for a new stadium with many PSLs.

Besides playing in a stunning yet loud stadium,  the Charger experience felt like a minor league baseball game. I'm surprised there weren't sausages running across the field.  They should've figured it out and made it work in SD.  Shoving the Chargers in LA with little fan base is pathetic. 

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Agree 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Limeaid said:

Time to move the Chargers someplace else who will appreciate them and pay for a new stadium with many PSLs.

Perennial bridesmaid Toronto? Or the first flagship franchise for Europe? :unsure:

  • Disagree 1
  • Dislike 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, Limeaid said:

Time to move the Chargers someplace else who will appreciate them and pay for a new stadium with many PSLs.

 

Aren’t they almost done building an amazing practice facility for them near LA? I’m sure they aren’t moving anywhere, at least for a decade.

Posted
7 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

Besides playing in a stunning yet loud stadium,  the Charger experience felt like a minor league baseball game. I'm surprised there weren't sausages running across the field.  They should've figured it out and made it work in SD.  Shoving the Chargers in LA with little fan base is pathetic. 

True. I was there. SoFi could be the 8th wonder of the world, with a AAA baseball team experience. Very few Charger fans, horrendous PA announcer. If only they showed replays on the $40,000,000 Jumbotron. They didn’t. 
I’ve been to two Bills games in San Diego. Crap stadium, excellent experience. 
San Diego deserves them back. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Not the Rams either.

 

The idea behind this game was that the Bills and Chargers would both be contenders down the stretch maybe for top seeds in the playoff and their divisions. In the end only one them kind of is.

Posted

I remember for years, the NFL's highest priority was to have two teams in LA. Not just one, but two. It was more than just Goodell, it was many people who wanted teams in LA. It was imagined to be a ratings golden goose.

 

It just goes to show you--having a collective group of billionaires does not translate into good business sense. 32 owners couldn't read the room and realize LA has little enthusiasm for professional football.

 

The sad part: In the NFL's misguided zeal to have two teams in LA, the fans in San Diego and St. Louis got the screw-job.

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted

To be fair, over twice the number of households saw the game in LA. Buffalo is obviously a loyal market, but the NFL wants eyes on the television, regardless of percentages in any given city. The league reached over 700K households in LA. The sheer size of that market is exactly what they wanted, even if only 12% of the city cared. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said:

Or the first flagship franchise for Europe?

 

I think that's reserved for the Jags.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, extrahammer said:

That's nothing new about California, especially LA. I've lived here for over 10 years and sports just isn't as important here as it is on the east coast or in the south. 

I’ve always seen the heart of NFL fandom being the Midwest. The west coast doesn’t care, the south is all about college ball, and the northeast has fair weather fans imo. I couldn’t agree more about the west coast, but I think sports just aren’t all that important in most of the larger cities. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
22 minutes ago, extrahammer said:

That's nothing new about California, especially LA. I've lived here for over 10 years and sports just isn't as important here as it is on the east coast or in the south. 

 

I thought they are passionate about the Lakers and Dodgers. It's not a great football market with the NFL. Maybe college with USC and UCLA.

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
25 minutes ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said:

Perennial bridesmaid Toronto? Or the first flagship franchise for Europe? :unsure:

 

I'd like to see the people of St. Louis made whole.

 

They got screwed and that city should have a team.

 

22 minutes ago, extrahammer said:

That's nothing new about California, especially LA. I've lived here for over 10 years and sports just isn't as important here as it is on the east coast or in the south. 

 

Cali fans are not as rabid as East Coast or Midwest fans but NorCal fans are considerably more rabid than SoCal fans.

 

16 minutes ago, stevens273 said:

True. I was there. SoFi could be the 8th wonder of the world, with a AAA baseball team experience. Very few Charger fans, horrendous PA announcer. If only they showed replays on the $40,000,000 Jumbotron. They didn’t. 
I’ve been to two Bills games in San Diego. Crap stadium, excellent experience. 
San Diego deserves them back

 

For better or worse, "deserving" has only to do with the degree to which a community is willing to force their politicians to build new multi-billion dollar venues.

 

1 minute ago, Gregg said:

 

I thought they are passionate about the Lakers and Dodgers. It's not a great football market with the NFL. Maybe college with USC and UCLA.

 

Dodgers fans are notorious for arriving late and leaving early.

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

It had the 5th lowest viewership numbers of the season ahead of only 3 overseas games and a Saints/ Panthers Monday night game.

 

The earlier game between the Bengals/Steelers had twice the viewers.

 

I'm guessing that the majority of people that signed up for peacock to see this game will dump peacock after the playoff game (which I'll bet is this seasons lowest rated playoff game)

  • Like (+1) 2
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...