Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
56 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

 

There are a lot of ways someone could argue that.  First, we didn't lose Allen.  We also had adequate depth, clearly, and we didn't lose our key players on the cusp of making the playoffs.  

 

At any rate, currently, I'd take our talent on offense over that of any team in the AFC right now.  

 

 

I agree, but I’d also attribute our slide between weeks 5 and 9 to not having Milano, Jones and White. Plus Oliver, Rousseau and Floyd at different points. Being down 6 starters on defense is not being overcome frequently. 
 

I mean we lost to NE with Kendall Vickers playing DE. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, JGMcD2 said:

I agree, but I’d also attribute our slide between weeks 5 and 9 to not having Milano, Jones and White. Plus Oliver, Rousseau and Floyd at different points. Being down 6 starters on defense is not being overcome frequently. 
 

I mean we lost to NE with Kendall Vickers playing DE. 

 

I guess, but the way that I look at it is that even with our injury losses, other teams with less talent played better and beat those same teams.  

 

So it's difficult for me to put it on that.  

 

Either way, right now we're in a catbird seat of sorts.  

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Scott7975 said:

 

They were on a short week and had to fly across the country.  That takes a toll.  Chargers defense played them different than other teams had.  Probably weren't expecting it.

 

They had 3 turnovers... but they also battled back from 3 turnovers while getting none of their own.  Thats not easy to do.

Oh I give the Bills a ton of credit for pulling out the win. I'm not trying to take anything away from the Bills. 

 

My point is I don't think they were flat. The game was just too big for a letdown or being flat. 

 

Rather, I think it was more the Chargers playing well and perhaps extra motivation. It was the different plays and schemes of the Chargers new regime. Bills players being sloppy and or not executing. 

 

I didn't see the Bills as being flat, unmotivated, tired, etc...

Posted
Just now, newcam2012 said:

Oh I give the Bills a ton of credit for pulling out the win. I'm not trying to take anything away from the Bills. 

 

My point is I don't think they were flat. The game was just too big for a letdown or being flat. 

 

Rather, I think it was more the Chargers playing well and perhaps extra motivation. It was the different plays and schemes of the Chargers new regime. Bills players being sloppy and or not executing. 

 

I didn't see the Bills as being flat, unmotivated, tired, etc...

 

They definitely had a different plan.  I never seen anyone use two spys on Allen before.

  • Agree 1
Posted

When the Bills falter against inferior teams, it is almost always on the offense. They have gone FLAT and/or coughed up the ball in the "bad" losses. They SHOULD be putting those games out of reach or at least making those mediocre teams offensively one-dimensional. 

Posted (edited)
On 12/24/2023 at 5:30 PM, Generic_Bills_Fan said:

Kickers never miss against us

or if they do, the miss gets negated by a mind-numbigly stupid penalty

Edited by Dan Darragh
  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...