Jump to content

Kickers are 26/27 in FGs against us this year


SageAgainstTheMachine

Recommended Posts

Just an example of some of the negative variance that we have to overcome.  It's one of those things that tends to normalize over a larger sample size but just like our luck on fumbled balls it's been going against us all season.  Even though it was Easton Stick and not Patrick Mahomes I didn't feel remotely comfortable at the end of this game because I think Dicker would have nailed it from 67 somehow.

 

But wouldn't it be awesome if this is where the worm turns?  

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 6
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SageAgainstTheMachine said:

Just an example of some of the negative variance that we have to overcome.  It's one of those things that tends to normalize over a larger sample size but just like our luck on fumbled balls it's been going against us all season.  Even though it was Easton Stick and not Patrick Mahomes I didn't feel remotely comfortable at the end of this game because I think Dicker would have nailed it from 67 somehow.

 

But wouldn't it be awesome if this is where the worm turns?  

Jeez crazy 🤔 it really is hard to believe, damn😜

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SageAgainstTheMachine said:

Just an example of some of the negative variance that we have to overcome.  It's one of those things that tends to normalize over a larger sample size but just like our luck on fumbled balls it's been going against us all season.  Even though it was Easton Stick and not Patrick Mahomes I didn't feel remotely comfortable at the end of this game because I think Dicker would have nailed it from 67 somehow.

 

But wouldn't it be awesome if this is where the worm turns?  

Now we blame the FGs against….

  • Vomit 1
  • Eyeroll 4
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, pigpen65 said:

Von Miller was going about 25% speed on that play. I don't even know what the point of him dressing for games is. But yeah, thank you Ed Oliver. And Bernard. 

he has to get up to game speed again, at the detriment of the team.  Duh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL should explore a rule change, in order to speed up games and limit injuries: Any Bills opponent can opt to simply take an automatic 3 points anywhere inside the Bills’ 40-yard line, any time of the game, any weather conditions, without the kicker having to actually take the field. Kinda like an intentional walk in baseball…why waste people’s time with kick that’s guaranteed to be good anyway?  Same with 1-point conversions…

11 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

I can’t remember the miss.  Wasn’t it a block?

Yes, I believe so.  And it’s not just this year…the phenomenon of Bills’ opposing kicker infallibility goes back a long time…

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, SageAgainstTheMachine said:

Just an example of some of the negative variance that we have to overcome.  It's one of those things that tends to normalize over a larger sample size but just like our luck on fumbled balls it's been going against us all season.  Even though it was Easton Stick and not Patrick Mahomes I didn't feel remotely comfortable at the end of this game because I think Dicker would have nailed it from 67 somehow.

 

But wouldn't it be awesome if this is where the worm turns?  


Thank you for looking that up. I was thinking of doing it myself after this game, since it seemed to me as well that other teams just don’t seem to miss (unless we have 12 men on the field).
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Rubes said:


Thank you for looking that up. I was thinking of doing it myself after this game, since it seemed to me as well that other teams just don’t seem to miss (unless we have 12 men on the field).
 

 

The kick by Elliott in the Eagles game was the craziest.  61 yards in the wind and rain.  Low line drive that looks like it wants to knuckle but just powers through.  There's no way that was higher than a 20% probability kick.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, gobills404 said:

That’s neat, but I don’t understand what “negative variance” means so I’m just gonna blame McDermott

If I'm understanding the feeling it's basically like when on one of those deep passes against us where it bounces off our DB into the WRs hands for a TD. Somebody did something to piss off Lady Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...