Pokebball Posted May 8 Posted May 8 46 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Notice you didn’t mention Jack Smith. Is it your belief that his actions have all been above board? Both Biden and Jack Smith are above the law 2
daz28 Posted May 8 Posted May 8 5 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: When you referred to her as a hack judge, I assumed that there were some rulings of hers that you disagreed with based on your sound legal knowledge. I didn’t realize it was just her experience or lack thereof that you object to. My "sound legal knowledge"? What credentials, specifically, do you base your chat forum opinions on? You do realize she had NEVER even been a judge, before she was appointed a Federal judge, right? She has only handled a handful of cases, including this one, and you're free to look them up, too: In a 2023 federal trial of an Alabama man accused of running a child pornography website, Cannon closed the jury selection to the public on the basis of space restrictions and also failed to swear in the jury. This was described as "a fundamental constitutional error" by legal experts. According to court transcripts from June 12, 2023, Cannon was repeatedly asked by both prosecutors and the defense attorney to open the courtroom. The public defense attorney objected to closing the courtroom, arguing that doing so violates the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, which Cannon overruled. She was forced to restart the jury selection process before the trial ended in a plea bargain without the jury deliberating
Tommy Callahan Posted May 9 Posted May 9 15 hours ago, Pokebball said: Both Biden and Jack Smith are above the law Jack is probably keeping a plane close to get back to the EU. 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted May 9 Posted May 9 17 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: Jack is probably keeping a plane close to get back to the EU. Smith would have made a fine prosecutor for the Committee for Public Safety or the Spanish Inquisition. 2
All_Pro_Bills Posted May 9 Posted May 9 (edited) 16 hours ago, daz28 said: My "sound legal knowledge"? What credentials, specifically, do you base your chat forum opinions on? You do realize she had NEVER even been a judge, before she was appointed a Federal judge, right? She has only handled a handful of cases, including this one, and you're free to look them up, too: In a 2023 federal trial of an Alabama man accused of running a child pornography website, Cannon closed the jury selection to the public on the basis of space restrictions and also failed to swear in the jury. This was described as "a fundamental constitutional error" by legal experts. According to court transcripts from June 12, 2023, Cannon was repeatedly asked by both prosecutors and the defense attorney to open the courtroom. The public defense attorney objected to closing the courtroom, arguing that doing so violates the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, which Cannon overruled. She was forced to restart the jury selection process before the trial ended in a plea bargain without the jury deliberating Perhaps holding the Prosecutor and the investigating FBI agents to the same level of procedural conduct would be prudent? They're accused of mishandling evidence in a number of ways including bringing outside documents to the location of the search warrant and using those documents as cover "top secret" pages to take photos of documents from the search spread across the floor meant to create dramatic effect for public and media consumption. What legitimate and honest law enforcement officers do such things? Just this alone could be grounds for dismissal, an illegal search, and should warrant disciplinary action which I'm 100% positive won't happen. I mean, why not plant some illegal guns and drugs around the house too? Edited May 9 by All_Pro_Bills 2 2
Tommy Callahan Posted May 9 Posted May 9 More and more it all looks like coordinated effort to hurt trump in the public eye and to keep him off the trail. But it resulted in keeping him in the cycle non stop and everyone is seeing how unbiased these cases are. Dems base has a long standing understanding and examples of the system being heavily biased. 1
daz28 Posted May 9 Posted May 9 2 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Perhaps holding the Prosecutor and the investigating FBI agents to the same level of procedural conduct would be prudent? They're accused of mishandling evidence in a number of ways including bringing outside documents to the location of the search warrant and using those documents as cover "top secret" pages to take photos of documents from the search spread across the floor meant to create dramatic effect for public and media consumption. What legitimate and honest law enforcement officers do such things? Just this alone could be grounds for dismissal, an illegal search, and should warrant disciplinary action which I'm 100% positive won't happen. I mean, why not plant some illegal guns and drugs around the house too? Speaking of shady, I just read today that Eastman's lawyer donated to the judges re-election campaign in the Georgia case. Two of the lawyers at Willis' office also donated to him. How is this legal???
All_Pro_Bills Posted May 9 Posted May 9 59 minutes ago, daz28 said: Speaking of shady, I just read today that Eastman's lawyer donated to the judges re-election campaign in the Georgia case. Two of the lawyers at Willis' office also donated to him. How is this legal??? I've come to believe that due to infinite money being thrown around, incestuous personal and business arrangements, and cronyism at all levels the entire system is subject to corruption and a housecleaning is overdue. What might be left to debate is how to clean up the mess and what new direction we might take. 1 1
daz28 Posted May 9 Posted May 9 2 hours ago, B-Man said: Oh, now it's not only cover sheets, but the classified documents were planted to frame him. That escalated quickly. LOLOL
All_Pro_Bills Posted May 10 Posted May 10 20 hours ago, daz28 said: Oh, now it's not only cover sheets, but the classified documents were planted to frame him. That escalated quickly. LOLOL The problem is the act of manipulating evidence for public relations stunts such as photos used for media attention and political purposes, which Federal law enforcement organizations should be above doing, opens the door for additional scrutiny and speculation. So they brought items similar to the items described in the search warrant to location of an executed search warrant and used them to fake the actual evidence recovered from the site in this way, how do we know you didn't fake it in other ways? How do we know they didn't plant anything? Or exceed their authority under the warrant? Credibility and confidence are lost. And a reasonable doubt the investigation is legitimate is open to questioning.
BillsFanNC Posted May 10 Author Posted May 10 (edited) They shipped documents to Mar a Lago that Trump never requested, then they requested Trump return documents he never requested, then while Trumps people were searching for the documents that were shipped but never requested, the FBI gestapo raids his home and carefully doctors evidence to release to a compliant media... And morons such as Daz... How dare you challenge my presumption of guilt narrative! Clowns to their core. Edited May 10 by BillsFanNC 1
Tiberius Posted May 13 Posted May 13 8 minutes ago, B-Man said: . He's prosecuting a coup attempted against your government. You seem to be on the side of the coup plotters. Shame, shame and eternal shame to you! 1
BillsFanNC Posted May 15 Author Posted May 15 55 minutes ago, B-Man said: . Quote via Jack Smith’s spokesperson, The King.
Recommended Posts