Jump to content

Election Interference | Trump’s 'fake electors' scheme | Michigan | Trump: Unindicted coconspirator


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, BillStime said:

One of Bonnie's favorites:

 

 

Yeah they don't give 2 f's about anything except their guy winning.  The orange guy utterly broke them.

 

This defence here is the most pathetic thing I've ever seen.

 

Steven Cheung, a Trump campaign spokesman, said Trump's actions "were taken in furtherance of his duty as president of the United States to faithfully take care of the laws and ensure election integrity, including investigating the rigged and stolen 2020 presidential election."

 

I broke the law because I thought they broke the law?  This is unreal.  Line these swine up for jail right beside their j6 buddies. 

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

Yeah they don't give 2 f's about anything except their guy winning.  The orange guy utterly broke them.

 

This defence here is the most pathetic thing I've ever seen.

 

Steven Cheung, a Trump campaign spokesman, said Trump's actions "were taken in furtherance of his duty as president of the United States to faithfully take care of the laws and ensure election integrity, including investigating the rigged and stolen 2020 presidential election."

 

I broke the law because I thought they broke the law?  This is unreal.  Line these swine up for jail right beside their j6 buddies. 

 

ETTD

Posted
1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

If I spammed 10 of these in a row, would it be spamming?  Or should I do it on 10 different thread to avoid the charge? Asking for a friend of NC.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-election-michigan-ronna-mcdaniel-1854814

 

Alongside an extract of the code, he wrote: "It seems like Ronna McDaniel could be in some trouble in Michigan and Donald Trump may be facing a fifth set of charges. A promise was offered in exchange for an official act unlike in Georgia where the preferred method appears to have been limited to browbeating state officials."

 

"The real issue is whether providing a lawyer is a 'valuable thing,'" he added. "On the one hand, it isn't the kind of thing that we typically would consider as being offered as a bribe. On the other hand, it is a materially valuable thing offered in exchange for an corrupt official act."

He continued: "If we think of bribery statues as criminalizing the offering/accepting of goods that are enriching or personally benefiting the public official, then dangling an attorney falls outside that prohibition. But the terms of this statute aren't so limited. Be curious to see caselaw..."

×
×
  • Create New...