L Ron Burgundy Posted January 10 Posted January 10 28 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Hardy har harrrrrr!!!!!!
BillsFanNC Posted January 10 Author Posted January 10 Commie attempts to deflect destroyed. That damn pesky constitution.
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 10 Posted January 10 1 minute ago, BillsFanNC said: Commie attempts to deflect destroyed. That damn pesky constitution. What privilege did big Gym and his buddies have Mr Independent? Why don't they just do a public hearing? They scared? If you watched this whole thing and thought reps did well you are nuts. They looked stupid. As usual.
daz28 Posted January 10 Posted January 10 4 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: If I remember correctly, the Jan 6th committee had to prove that their subpoenas had to be for legislative purposes, ie a reason they may need to create new laws. That's why Barr wouldn't give them an unredacted Mueller report, right? This is what they're saying is their reasoning: The House Oversight Committee report recommending a contempt charge stated Hunter Biden's testimony is "necessary" to determine whether there are "sufficient grounds" for impeachment. You want to talk about rabbit holes, and slippery slopes boy. You could call just about anyone in for that reasoning, and it has nothing to do with legislation. Hunter will already be in prison LONG before this ever makes its way through the courts, and his dad will likely have passed on. Just more proof that Washington and the courts are set up to conceal the truth. Then again, they aren't seeking the truth, they're seeking more power. What a mess.
US Egg Posted January 11 Posted January 11 https://news.yahoo.com/hunter-biden-attorney-makes-statement-155340762.html “Biden’s attorney Abbe Lowell made a statement on his behalf. Lowell claimed that Biden was being used as a surrogate to attack his father, President Joe Biden.” That’s never been done before.
John from Riverside Posted January 13 Posted January 13 It’s such an interesting thread The only ones that have actively refused to show up for the subpoena or Republicans specifically Republican lawmakers I’m no fan of Hunter Biden, but he has been on Capitol Hill twice. The Republicans could’ve just sat him down and sworn him in and asked their questions. But you can’t have that because Democrat lawmakers would also get to ask their questions and he wouldn’t do it behind closed doors I’m willing to bet that Democratic lawmakers would be more than happy to allow the subpoenas going to Jim Jordan for instance, to be in front of the public 1
BillStime Posted January 14 Posted January 14 GYM JORDAN lmao GYM F'n JORDAN has been defying his own subpoena for almost two years now. So, tell us Karen - Defying A Congressional Subpoena: Does It Matter? Idiots F'n idiots
BillsFanNC Posted January 20 Author Posted January 20 All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others....
ChiGoose Posted April 29 Posted April 29 Sucks to suck. All this guy had to do was show up and plead the 5th. Instead, he’s in jail because he’s an idiot.
Recommended Posts