Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I think Brady has done good work with this offense.  Every week I am getting closer to thinking Brady is IT.  A good week against the Cowboys and I am there.  This is some good stuff here.  Its only 4 plays but really good stuff and it shows Brady throwing a wrinkle to get a look you want after a defense adjusted to the same basic play earlier.

 

 

Edited by Scott7975
  • Like (+1) 5
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 4
Posted

Brady has done alright. The four strong motion gimmick worked for almost an half and then KC adjusted and Brady had nothing. Similar thing in Philly, offense had early success and then folded when adjustments were made.

 

Buffalo was brutal in the 2nd half vs KC because Brady was predictable, just like Dorsey. The bubble screens were obvious, emptying the backfield and trying to run Josh at one point fooled nobody…just boring and easy to see coming.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Dislike 2
Posted

The difference in the use of motion in the last few weeks has been night and day. It is nice to see our receivers suddenly having acrres of space.

  • Agree 3
Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, Buddy Hix said:

Brady has done alright. The four strong motion gimmick worked for almost an half and then KC adjusted and Brady had nothing. Similar thing in Philly, offense had early success and then folded when adjustments were made.

 

Buffalo was brutal in the 2nd half vs KC because Brady was predictable, just like Dorsey. The bubble screens were obvious, emptying the backfield and trying to run Josh at one point fooled nobody…just boring and easy to see coming.

 

The thing I would disagree on here is the bubble screen thing actually did work.  Josh just took too long to come off Diggs and didn't see Davis wide ass open streaking to the end zone.  If he came off Diggs a half second sooner then that was an easy TD instead of incomplete to Kincaid who was covered tight.  Also Buffalo scored 14 points in the second half of the Eagles game and it should have been 17 if not for the missed FG.

Edited by Scott7975
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)

I miss Ken Dorsey throwing valuable merchandise around the press box cubicle 

I really really miss that....

 

.

Edited by Bogie_Klinkhammer
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 5
Posted

Jets Eagles KC —> Top D’s, couple good teams

 

Brady gets A-  

 

we forget Dorsey no score 1H’s!?!  coaching offense 1H is based on good O coach weekday plan; 2H adjustments 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Scott7975 said:

 

The thing I would disagree on here is the bubble screen thing actually did work.  Josh just took too long to come off Diggs and didn't see Davis wide ass open streaking to the end zone.  If he came off Diggs a half second sooner then that was an easy TD instead of incomplete to Kincaid who was covered tight.  Also Buffalo scored 14 points in the second half of the Eagles game and it should have been 17 if not for the missed FG.

I honestly think that was an internal

pressure, or obligation if you will, that josh had to throw the ball to Diggs. Seems like that has been an issue all year for josh at times. Especially in the broncos game. 
 

This offense is way more successful when we spread the ball around 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 2
Posted
51 minutes ago, Since1981 said:

Jets Eagles KC —> Top D’s, couple good teams

 

Brady gets A-  

 

we forget Dorsey no score 1H’s!?!  coaching offense 1H is based on good O coach weekday plan; 2H adjustments 

 

Wait, I need my Little Orphan Annie Decoder pin to figure this out.

 

image.thumb.png.b83d64483abda0a4d6ac5e2678ed725c.png

 

Oh Yeah, it means Joe Brady needs to "drink more Ovaltine." Got it.

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted

The O needs to execute screens better, not stop calling them. These plays can go for big yardage and slow down the rush if the pass is precisely placed and often require the pass catcher to beat one tackler at the line of scrimmage.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Brady does a lot of mixed personnel usage. We’ve seen everything from 13 BIG (two TEs and 6th OL) in condensed Jumbo looks to 11 in an empty formation.

 

A lot of the success we’ve seen has been Allen just taking good match ups.

 

We still sorely lack the ability to push the ball down the field, or have guys get open with pure skill alone. 
 

I am very far from simply wanting Brady to take the OC job permanently. Allen’s unreal ability continues to mask a lot of the issues we would passing game, and there are many layers of blame you could cast.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Scott7975 said:

Also Buffalo scored 14 points in the second half of the Eagles game and it should have been 17 if not for the missed FG.

Or 21 if the horse collar had been called, or even intentional grounding not called. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

As long as we aren’t forcing those atrocious screens again I see that as an improvement. 
 

Big test to see what he does to negate Parsons and help Brown out. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Since1981 said:

Jets Eagles KC —> Top D’s, couple good teams

 

Brady gets A-  

 

we forget Dorsey no score 1H’s!?!  coaching offense 1H is based on good O coach weekday plan; 2H adjustments 

 

 

Eagles with the worst pass D in the NFL

Posted

Wasn't that what Payton Manning use to say all the time ? They only had really a handful of plays that they used over & over again because they worked & then throw in a wrinkle as far as a motion every now & again to throw the dog off the scent of what they were doing then go back to it . 

Posted
4 hours ago, Buddy Hix said:

Buffalo was brutal in the 2nd half vs KC because Brady was predictable, just like Dorsey. The bubble screens were obvious, emptying the backfield and trying to run Josh at one point fooled nobody…just boring and easy to see coming.

   Can’t argue but this was Brady’s 3rd or 4th game as OC.

   Tome wasn’t built in a day and it will take time for him to hit his stride and even longer to excel.

    I have to say I pleasantly surprised by his second OC stint .

    

Posted

For 4 strong to really work, it is important which receiver remains on the weak side of the formation.  It is most effective when it is a guy that can beat one on one coverage and/or requires double coverage.  For the Bills, Diggs should be the weak side guy.  He wins often against single coverage and if he draws double coverage, someone on the strong side should be open easily.  Davis on the weak side is not as effective.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...