Bills @ Chiefs Postgame Thread

[Milanos Milano]

3 minutes ago, ToGoGo said:

He’s a salty troll who’s reaching. Ignore him. 

How’s it being a salty troll to say the truth that we lost to KC when it mattered most when they had a #1 WR in Hill? They don’t currently have a #1 WR in Hill, so maybe this year we can beat them in the playoffs if we get in. 

[Rubes]

1 hour ago, mannc said:

We don’t have WRs who can pick up YAC on that play anyway.  It’s a total waste.

 

Personally, I don't think we have the WRs who can block well enough to allow the intended receiver to pick up YAC.

 

[Scott7975]

2 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

he needs to get some low positive coaching. 

[Royale with Cheese]

Just now, Araiza Curse said:

My point is, that KC has had and did beat us with a better WR (Hill) in the past. If they had that again then they would likely beat us. I also agree if we had another #2 WR to pair with Diggs, that we would be better and stand a good chance at beating them when it matters. But we won’t know because we never stay healthy and our drafting isn’t good enough to realize that scenario. 

We beat them with Hill as well.

 

The point doesn’t make any sense lol.

You cant just add talent to an area where they are weak and then using it to say they would beat us lol.

 

Bills are weak at safety.  Can I say “If the Bills had Derwin James, the Eagles wouldn’t have beat us?”

[Milanos Milano]

Just now, Royale with Cheese said:

We beat them with Hill as well.

 

The point doesn’t make any sense lol.

You cant just add talent to an area where they are weak and then using it to say they would beat us lol.

 

Bills are weak at safety.  Can I say “If the Bills had Derwin James, the Eagles wouldn’t have beat us?”

We beat them with Hill during the regular season that doesn’t hold as much value as in the playoffs. Everything changes in the playoffs. Teams and players play harder than they do in the regular season. We did not beat them with Hill when it mattered the most. That’s just a fact. 

[Starr Almighty]

I notice this the most with KC. But why is the line not on the line?

[Royale with Cheese]

1 minute ago, Araiza Curse said:

We beat them with Hill during the regular season that doesn’t hold as much value as in the playoffs. Everything changes in the playoffs. Teams and players play harder than they do in the regular season. We did not beat them with Hill when it mattered the most. That’s just a fact. 

So it took a blunder for them to beat us with Hill.  Are you thinking this is a strong argument or something?

 

[Milanos Milano]

Lol I know some people struggle with facts, but wow I guess it’s a tough thing to deal with. I want to see a Super Bowl victory as much as the next fan, but I’m not going to ignore the truth just because it makes me feel uncomfortable. When we beat them in the playoffs, then we can talk more. 

1 minute ago, Royale with Cheese said:

So it took a blunder for them to beat us with Hill.  Are you thinking this is a strong argument or something?

 

Blunder or not, it’s still a loss. Until we beat them, they have us. Just what it is. 

Edited December 11, 2023 by Araiza Curse

[Royale with Cheese]

7 minutes ago, Araiza Curse said:

How’s it being a salty troll to say the truth that we lost to KC when it mattered most when they had a #1 WR in Hill? They don’t currently have a #1 WR in Hill, so maybe this year we can beat them in the playoffs if we get in. 

It took a blunder for them to beat us.

[Simon]

Just now, Royale with Cheese said:

It took a blunder for them to beat us.

 

But they would have beat us without any blunders if they had Calvin Johnson.

[Milanos Milano]

Just now, Royale with Cheese said:

It took a blunder for them to beat us.

Sure, but that doesn’t change the fact. We lost to KC in the playoffs when they had a true #1 WR. Until we beat them in the playoffs, they own us. Beating them in the regular season doesn’t matter if we can’t beat them in the playoffs. 

[Sammy Watkins' Rib]

1 minute ago, Starr Almighty said:

I notice this the most with KC. But why is the line not on the line?

 

That's insane. If that is their typical "line" the NFL needs to start cracking down. 

 

We don't need teams lining up like this. It puts the Bills at a disadvantage. Our QB is mobile, can break the ankles of free rushers and is the current NFL QB ironman. Force all teams to play with a legal line and the Bills will have yet another QB advantage over the other guys. 

[Starr Almighty]

1 minute ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said:

 

That's insane. If that is their typical "line" the NFL needs to start cracking down. 

 

We don't need teams lining up like this. It puts the Bills at a disadvantage. Our QB is mobile, can break the ankles of free rushers and is the current NFL QB ironman. Force all teams to play with a legal line and the Bills will have yet another QB advantage over the other guys. 

They line up like this every game Ive watched for what seems to be every play

[Milanos Milano]

1 minute ago, Royale with Cheese said:

Yeah but they wouldn’t have beat us if we had Aaron Donald.

Possibly. But it’s still a fact though that KC beat us in the playoffs when they had a #1 WR. Which when i said that if KC had another #1 WR, they would likely beat us when it matters (because they’ve already proven they could). But they don’t this year, so maybe we can finally do it? 

Edited December 11, 2023 by Araiza Curse

[Royale with Cheese]

2 minutes ago, Araiza Curse said:

Sure, but that doesn’t change the fact. We lost to KC in the playoffs when they had a true #1 WR. Until we beat them in the playoffs, they own us. Beating them in the regular season doesn’t matter if we can’t beat them in the playoffs. 

The fact that you trying to tie those two together, especially in that game is hilarious.

[Milanos Milano]

Just now, Royale with Cheese said:

The fact that you trying to tie those two together, especially in that game is hilarious.

What part of my statement was incorrect? 

A. Did they not beat us in the playoffs when it mattered most? 

B. Did they not beat us in the playoffs when they had a #1 WR (Hill)? 

[Royale with Cheese]

1 minute ago, Araiza Curse said:

Possibly. But it’s still a fact though that KC beat us in the playoffs when they had a #1 WR. Which when i said that if KC had another #1 WR, they would likely beat us when it matters (because they’ve already proven they could). But they don’t this year, so maybe we can finally do it? 

Geezus dude…lol

 

[Scott7975]

1 hour ago, zow2 said:

Good result tonight too.  I wanted Dallas to be coming in off a win, feeling all satisfied and happy about themselves.  Not desperate.  They won’t be all that interested in playing in cold, breezy Orchard Park.

They aren’t going to have a down game over that. They are in a race for the division and one seed. 
 

that stuff doesn’t matter anyways. Just like the Chiefs losing last week didn’t matter. 

Edited December 11, 2023 by Scott7975

[Warcodered]

9 minutes ago, Araiza Curse said:

Sure, but that doesn’t change the fact. We lost to KC in the playoffs when they had a true #1 WR. Until we beat them in the playoffs, they own us. Beating them in the regular season doesn’t matter if we can’t beat them in the playoffs. 

bull#### you've just been whining about how this all didn't count because they don't have a #1 WR, we do it in the playoffs you're going to be saying the same *****.

[Milanos Milano]

1 minute ago, Warcodered said:

bull#### you've just been whining about how this all didn't count because they don't have a #1 WR, we do it in the playoffs you're going to be saying the same *****.

If we beat them in the playoffs, then I will say we beat them in the playoffs without them having a #1WR. What is so untruthful in that statement. Doesn’t mean it isn’t an important accomplishment, but truth is still truth.