Bill from NYC Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 Is anybody surprised? To all of you actual, or pseudo libs.....why are you in favor of politicians, prisoners, war criminals, etc. who harm us, and our children? Do you simply hate our way of life? Guilt? What is wrong with you? To all of you dems.....you will continue to be the losers that you presently are until you rid your party of this type of lowlife. He was against smoking in bars, but is FOR more rights for sex offenders. It is a shame. I wish that I could vote for more democrats, but the party is a vile, sinking ship. Another disgusting display by the party of Hillary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slothrop Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 holy shlt, you nailed it - as a progressive I am against everything american, I shlt on the bible, eat babies, and worship the devil (under the guise of secularism). Get a clue before you spew your trite venom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 holy shlt, you nailed it - as a progressive I am against everything american, I shlt on the bible, eat babies, and worship the devil (under the guise of secularism). 354093[/snapback] Sounds about right. Here's what the left is about: 1) Propping up all other religions outside of Christianity. 2) Sticking up for the enemies of our country: Arab middle easterners (namely the Palestinians), Communist China, and socialist Europe 3) Supporting Labor's destructive crusade against American free enterprise. 4) Excessive taxation and wasteful government spending 5) elimination of traditional family structures via support for abortion and queer marriage. 6) Enslavement of minorities to the leftist political machine through overarching social "welfare" programs I could go on and on, but really, what's the point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted June 9, 2005 Author Share Posted June 9, 2005 holy shlt, you nailed it - as a progressive I am against everything american, I shlt on the bible, eat babies, and worship the devil (under the guise of secularism). Get a clue before you spew your trite venom 354093[/snapback] Listen, the link is about one of YOUR party bigwigs that is coddling sex offenders, not mine. "Progressive?" Is that how you would label Rev. "Wedlock" Jackson while he is in California consoling Michael Jackson? Yet another example of the dems seeking the criminal pervert vote. Far too many dems have lost touch with mainstream life in our country. You may not see it nor want to see it, but it doesn't make it less true. When people such as Silver, Hillary, Sharpton and Jackson (two competing extortionists), Pelosi and Kerry are influential figures and leaders in your party, things are looking bad, wouldn't you agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slothrop Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 Listen, the link is about one of YOUR party bigwigs that is coddling sex offenders, not mine. "Progressive?" Is that how you would label Rev. "Wedlock" Jackson while he is in California consoling Michael Jackson? Yet another example of the dems seeking the criminal pervert vote. Far too many dems have lost touch with mainstream life in our country. You may not see it nor want to see it, but it doesn't make it less true. When people such as Silver, Hillary, Sharpton and Jackson (two competing extortionists), Pelosi and Kerry are influential figures and leaders in your party, things are looking bad, wouldn't you agree? 354177[/snapback] First, I am not a democrat - the two parties are bought and sold corporate whores. So quit talking about my "party." The political spectrum is not as narrow as you would like it to be with all liberals being democrats and all conservatives being republicans. I am not liberal - I am progressive. Look it up - its VERY different. Second, I have no idea what you are talking aout with Rev. Jackson - I assume you are talking about Jesse Jackson. I have not been paying attention to the Jackson trial so I do not know his involvement. But, I will say this. I know there is not a verdict yet - so how do YOU know he is a sex offender? All trials should be conducted through the media - great idea! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted June 9, 2005 Author Share Posted June 9, 2005 First, I am not a democrat - the two parties are bought and sold corporate whores. So quit talking about my "party." The political spectrum is not as narrow as you would like it to be with all liberals being democrats and all conservatives being republicans. I am not liberal - I am progressive. Look it up - its VERY different. Second, I have no idea what you are talking aout with Rev. Jackson - I assume you are talking about Jesse Jackson. I have not been paying attention to the Jackson trial so I do not know his involvement. But, I will say this. I know there is not a verdict yet - so how do YOU know he is a sex offender? All trials should be conducted through the media - great idea! 354188[/snapback] Well, the fact that he already paid out millions to silence an allegation, and that kiddie porn with little boys was found in his home are pretty good indications that Jackson is a pedophile, wouldn't you say? But.....dont let me stand in the way of sympathy for sex offenders. Thanks for proving my point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slothrop Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 Well, the fact that he already paid out millions to silence an allegation, and that kiddie porn with little boys was found in his home are pretty good indications that Jackson is a pedophile, wouldn't you say? But.....dont let me stand in the way of sympathy for sex offenders. Thanks for proving my point. 354198[/snapback] Excuse me for standing up for Due Process and our judicial system - how liberal - or maybe its "revolutionary." If he is guilty he shoud be sentensed to the full extent of the law - we should wait until after he is convicted before you start alleging people support sex offenders - Kangaroo Courts are generally not a good thing - at least so I have been told. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 Excuse me for standing up for Due Process and our judicial system - how liberal - or maybe its "revolutionary." If he is guilty he shoud be sentensed to the full extent of the law - we should wait until after he is convicted before you start alleging people support sex offenders - Kangaroo Courts are generally not a good thing - at least so I have been told. 354235[/snapback] Due process is pretty much a joke when you have as much money to manipulate the media machine as Jackson and OJ Simpson do. Jackson fits the profile pretty much to a "T". Even if he's found not guilty, it doesn't mean he's not a child molester - it just means the system failed yet again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reuben Gant Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 holy shlt, you nailed it - as a progressive I am against everything american, I shlt on the bible, eat babies, and worship the devil (under the guise of secularism). Get a clue before you spew your trite venom 354093[/snapback] Thank the Lord (whoops, great creator spirit) that there are more than one of us out there. I am too busy hating soldiers, plotting ways to overthrow america, and thinking up ways too be more caring for our societies pedophiles that I almost forgot that there are (sniff) more than one of us out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted June 9, 2005 Author Share Posted June 9, 2005 Thank the Lord (whoops, great creator spirit) that there are more than one of us out there. I am too busy hating soldiers, plotting ways to overthrow america, and thinking up ways too be more caring for our societies pedophiles that I almost forgot that there are (sniff) more than one of us out there. 354359[/snapback] Well, how DO you feel about the leadership of your party? Do you think that they represent the interests of the average American any more than the Bush Administration? Btw, if your instinctive reaction is to ask me if I am very pleased with Bush, the answer is no. I am sickened by his labor policy, and do not favor the social security proposal. But, you know what......I think that he does a better job of keeping America safe than does Nancy Pelosi, and the long line of weak kneed, criminal coddling liars who are the leaders on the leadership dem side. The electorate seems to agree. Jmo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albany,n.y. Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 Remember who protected Boxley? http://www.1010wins.com/topstories/winstop..._054110245.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campy Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 Excuse me for standing up for Due Process and our judicial system - how liberal - or maybe its "revolutionary." 354235[/snapback] I've noticed on more than one occasion that the whole "innocent until proven guilty" thingy really trips people up. It's just so damned inconvenient some times. Our judicial system may not be perfect, but it's as close to perfection as man has ever come. It's too bad that it gets blamed for human shortcomings by the reactionary Hot Packet crowd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reuben Gant Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 Well, how DO you feel about the leadership of your party? Do you think that they represent the interests of the average American any more than the Bush Administration? 354384[/snapback] I guess I am less likely to see things through a Right/Republican Left/Democrat prism than you may be. I tend to think that the expansion of presidental powers in the last 30 years is a detriment to our democracy, (I disliked both Clinton and now Bush) and your characterization of the left as pedophile coddling, america hating, abortion cheering, etc. is an unhelpful characterization that stymies most debate about how this country's democratic institutions are being slowly dismantled by Multinational Corporations. I also see how the tax burden of federal government has been shifted once to the states and now to poor counties cloaked as tax cuts. My Federal Tax savings are a hell of a lot less then what I now have to pay extra do to the local Medicade/Medicare burdens. Where Democrats have lost the card game is in their failure to address the needs of a rural electorate. The Republicans have won this segment of the electorate by paying lip service to their moral values. But keep up the anger if it makes you happy, and I would bet that Joe Six's characterization of the left would probably only describe 1% of 1% of the electorate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachChuckDickerson Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 I've noticed on more than one occasion that the whole "innocent until proven guilty" thingy really trips people up. It's just so damned inconvenient some times. Our judicial system may not be perfect, but it's as close to perfection as man has ever come. It's too bad that it gets blamed for human shortcomings by the reactionary Hot Packet crowd. 354433[/snapback] WHAT?!?! That is rediculous!! I only eat lean pockets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 Is anybody surprised? To all of you actual, or pseudo libs.....why are you in favor of politicians, prisoners, war criminals, etc. who harm us, and our children? Do you simply hate our way of life? Guilt? What is wrong with you? To all of you dems.....you will continue to be the losers that you presently are until you rid your party of this type of lowlife. He was against smoking in bars, but is FOR more rights for sex offenders. It is a shame. I wish that I could vote for more democrats, but the party is a vile, sinking ship. Another disgusting display by the party of Hillary 354086[/snapback] Nothing creepy going on in the Republican Party, right? What if some politician on the right had a child born at 20 weeks that died after two hours outside the womb. Upon the child's death, the politician took the baby home and cuddled it , kissed it, and made his other three children do the same, and even took pictures with the deceased...pictures he could later hang in his office. Please- I'll say it's a toss-up between the parties when it comes to creepy, OK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted June 9, 2005 Author Share Posted June 9, 2005 Nothing creepy going on in the Republican Party, right? What if some politician on the right had a child born at 20 weeks that died after two hours outside the womb. Upon the child's death, the politician took the baby home and cuddled it , kissed it, and made his other three children do the same, and even took pictures with the deceased...pictures he could later hang in his office. Please- I'll say it's a toss-up between the parties when it comes to creepy, OK? 354450[/snapback] JA, there are a TON of things that are creepy about the far right. Some of them for instance want to jail Howard Stern because he is "indecent." They even want to regulate him on Satellite Radio, a completely optional service. These fanatics are little different from the lefties, who have given the state authority to send "health inspectors" into bars, search them and issue summunses for "Ashtray Possession." Fanatics such as these often meet in the middle, whereas they both confiscate our liberty. One thing that I WILL say for Republicans is that you will be hard pressed to find them trying to protect sexual offenders; actualy legislate for them. NYS Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver is holding up legislation to protect us from sexual predators. He, as Harvey said, was also accused of protecting a rapist on his staff. Forgive me if I am a tad more sickened by the left, especially the white liberals, who as none other than Al Sharpton says, "say one thing, and do another." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 FWIW, IMO - ANY convicted sex offender, with VERY few exceptions needs the maximum anything possible. Brand them on the forehead, for all I care. I'm disturbed by the female legislator qualifying "young" offenders as being unduly punished by stricter systems. WTF? Somewhere along the line, common sense is going to have to rear it's ugly head over 300 pages of ways to both get and skirt "due process". I would also think that even though there are sick SOB's who are going to do whatever anyway, totally stigmatizing the CRAP out of someone who decides he's going to nail 12 year old girls, or boys may act as some deterrent to at least a few. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 Death penalty for child molesters (done within 1 year of conviction) and life and castration for rapists. On second thought castration and death for the rapists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry Tate Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 Is anybody surprised? To all of you actual, or pseudo libs.....why are you in favor of politicians, prisoners, war criminals, etc. who harm us, and our children? Do you simply hate our way of life? Guilt? What is wrong with you? To all of you dems.....you will continue to be the losers that you presently are until you rid your party of this type of lowlife. He was against smoking in bars, but is FOR more rights for sex offenders. It is a shame. I wish that I could vote for more democrats, but the party is a vile, sinking ship. Another disgusting display by the party of Hillary 354086[/snapback] Not a lot of details in the story. Sure the Dems aren't just trying to keep teenagers convicted of statutory rape of their teenage girlfriends off the list? Just trying to be fair - I don't know the answer. I can't imagine any other acceptable exceptions off the top of my head. If it's an attempt to protect civil liberties of convicted child molesters, that's one thing, but I wouldn't want the hypothetical teen thrown into the same boat, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Not a lot of details in the story. Sure the Dems aren't just trying to keep teenagers convicted of statutory rape of their teenage girlfriends off the list? Just trying to be fair - I don't know the answer. I can't imagine any other acceptable exceptions off the top of my head. If it's an attempt to protect civil liberties of convicted child molesters, that's one thing, but I wouldn't want the hypothetical teen thrown into the same boat, either. 354742[/snapback] That would make sense - so it's not very likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts