Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, mannc said:

It's been reported that there is a clause in Miller's contract that allows the Bills to void the remainder of his contract if he violates the league's personal conduct policy, but I'm not sure what sort of dead cap hit that would entail.

 

I would hope there would be no dead cap hit given the circumstances.

 

The Bills aren't the Dolphins or Chiefs, teams OK with keeping domestic violence abusers on their roster, he's got to be gone as soon as possible no matter what.

Posted

You know what?  I just realized that we're winning the Super Bowl this year.

 

Because there is no way the universe can be this cruel.  A more positive outcome is guaranteed.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, boyst said:

Anyone remember the situation for Hernandez in New England*?

 

He was under contract, right?


If he was, and NE had to take dead cap hits, you’d think teams would protect themselves from that in the future, no?

Posted

https://www.espn.com/blog/boston/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4744681/revisiting-details-of-hernandez-contract

 

Quote

For those asking what the salary cap charge would be in the event the Patriots ever decided to terminate the contract, the charge would be the acceleration of the $12.5 million signing bonus. If that happened in 2013, Hernandez would count $2.55 million against the salary cap, and then in 2014 would carry a cap charge of $7.5 million from the remaining proration on the signing bonus.

 

One other factor to consider: A club can recover bonus money and avoid a cap hit if a player violates one of the league's personal conduct policies or defaults on contract language.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Behindenemylines said:

So just how ugly were those Soccer Moms when you picked him up from school today?  

My wife picked him up and she just found out about the news. She yells at our son, “I told you to wear the Allen jersey!”

 

 

Edited by Buddy Hix
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, JakeFrommStateFarm said:

This is now on ABC world news tonight!!

 

Araiza

Tops Shooting/Bills Response

Hamlin

Von Miller

 

Teams go decades never making national news.  4x in two years.  
 

Edited by SCBills
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Special K said:

 

I would hope there would be no dead cap hit given the circumstances.

 

The Bills aren't the Dolphins or Chiefs, teams OK with keeping domestic violence abusers on their roster, he's got to be gone as soon as possible no matter what.

Someone upthread indicated that the Bills would still be stuck with the dead cap hit, just as the Raiders were in the Ruggs situation.  I'm sure the team is thoroughly investigating all the ins and outs here.   

Posted

I read somewhere today that the woman he assaulted was his SEVEN YEAR companion. If the latter is true, then that is really, really sad.

 

Yes, I know it's sad/bad that (if true), he did this to any woman, but IMHO, there would be a difference if it was some escort or ONS vs a woman he obviously loves/loved, and has a LTR with.

Posted
1 hour ago, zow2 said:

Von’s public persona is so nice and upbeat.  You just never know what a person is like behind closed doors.


Or slammed doors. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, mannc said:

Someone upthread indicated that the Bills would still be stuck with the dead cap hit, just as the Raiders were in the Ruggs situation.  I'm sure the team is thoroughly investigating all the ins and outs here.   


This seems crazy.  
 

What if a QB did this?  What if multiple players on a team all violate personal conduct together.  Team just has to fold up shop for years?

Posted
11 minutes ago, Success said:

You know what?  I just realized that we're winning the Super Bowl this year.

 

Because there is no way the universe can be this cruel.  A more positive outcome is guaranteed.

 

If that's how it works this should our second right?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, boyst said:

Anyone remember the situation for Hernandez in New England*?

 

He was under contract, right?

He was convicted and the Pats still had to pay him.

 

I believe that's why they have the clause in most contracts related to suspensions/arrests/convictions in pretty much every contract now.

Edited by The Wiz
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, boyst said:

Anyone remember the situation for Hernandez in New England*?

 

He was under contract, right?

 

IIRC they cut him before he went to the stoney lonesome, so I think they had to eat the cap. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Scott7975 said:

 

Exactly.  You can tell the people (not everyone) that are just jumping for joy over this because they think it's an easy out on this contract.  Same people would be hating it if Von was playing at his elite level.  I'm disgusted either way if this is true.

 

Some guys are turning this situation into "fire everyone" "clean house" "the organization is a mess."  "what can we save on his contract" "easy out." etc.. This is just disgusting in itself. 


First day on the internet?  You’ll love it!!

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
5 minutes ago, mannc said:

Someone upthread indicated that the Bills would still be stuck with the dead cap hit, just as the Raiders were in the Ruggs situation.  I'm sure the team is thoroughly investigating all the ins and outs here.   

 

That would really suck if that is the case.....would really put the Bills in a no win situation.

 

 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...