Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
59 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

Here's the more specific allegations:

 

 

Gotta wait for more facts to come out. But there are bruises and abrasions on a pregnant woman. I don't really see how even the best case scenario here could be anything less than damning for Von Miller.

If you slam the door and I'm on the other side, can you tell that I am " visibly" agitated?

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, billsfan_34 said:

He sure did; just remember we were a dumpster fire before he got here. The grass isn’t always greener…

How were we a dumpster fire? We were coming off a great season. 
 

Free agents were coming here cheaper than they’d get elsewhere. You don’t do that to go to a dumpster fire. 

Edited by Bobby Hooks
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

The issue would be the timeline, if this doesn't play out quickly enough it's possible even if they do eventually suspend him that it'll be after those cap hits are set.

The Pats were still on the hook for Hernandez when he got suspended since it was guaranteed.. and that man was the lowest form of human life. 

Posted
4 hours ago, ALLinALLEN said:

We're going to be the Lions and have to trade Allen to a superbowl contender so we can see him win arent we?

 

I joke but were halfway there in years....

I feel like this statement is true, I feel it deep….. deep down in my plums. 

Posted

Man, part of the reason they brought him in was because of his leadership.

 

This incident sounds so ugly.  If proven true, I absolutely hope they cut him without hesitation..

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Bobby Hooks said:

How were we a dumpster fire? We were coming off a great season. 
 

Free agents were coming here cheaper than they’d get elsewhere. You don’t do that to go to a dumpster fire. 

He meant Beane, not Miller.

Posted

If they cut Matt Araiza for allegedly raping an individual and knew of Von Miller's previous troubles in Denver in 2021 that mysteriously disappeared,then Beane is on the hot seat also because Von was a bust.Better days are ahead fellow Bills fan.

Posted
4 hours ago, ALLinALLEN said:

We're going to be the Lions and have to trade Allen to a superbowl contender so we can see him win arent we?

 

I joke but were halfway there in years....

 

Sure, if you want to give up. The Bills can turn back into pumpkins like we're used to. It won't be that bad. We can debate who we are drafting and which washed out QB to sign. All our games will be at 1pm. Just like old times.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, boyst said:

she could easily say they came from someone else or refuse to testify. women do this all the time in domestic issues, sadly. it's not for money - it's fear, conditioning, or other such things that make it a tragedy.

 

a non cooperative witness makes a case unable to prosecute. there have there have been cases where the accuser is paid and a settlement reached - literally a time where they sent the witness on a vacation when the court dates came up.

 

3 minutes ago, Patrick Duffy said:

Was going to mention basically about the same type of thing @boyst stated below

 

 

 

Ok. Then I'll answer both of ya...lol.

 

While correct having the victim back out and not testify can usually lead to the case not moving forward, there are also many cases where it has. Some states do have different laws regarding it, but in some places if the police find the evidence and the DA wishes to proceed it's because there is enough evidence to convict without a witness. Would hardly be unprecedented is my point. 

 

Now do they have that? That I don't know. Would the DA prosecute a famous athlete without a witness? Again, not known. But it is plausible that Texas of all places would move forward with it. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, stlbills13 said:

 

I agree with all of this but really I'm just operating under the assumption that money talks. Even in justice-heavy states like Texas

Yep. Money talks so much in Texas that they convinced the NFL to let the Texans off scott free in the Watson case, minus the "salary cap" violation and stripping them of a 5th round pick.

 

Watson's a scumbag. Miller's a scumbag. Let's see what happens.

Posted
7 minutes ago, PatsFanNH said:

The Pats were still on the hook for Hernandez when he got suspended since it was guaranteed.. and that man was the lowest form of human life. 

Also supremely ***** in the head.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Warcodered said:

Also supremely ***** in the head.

Oh I 100% agree! I was just saying if the Pats ended up having to pay him the Bills would probably be on the hook for Miller.  Although I can’t remember if the league made them or if the fiancée sued for the money.. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Call_Of_Ktulu said:

I feel like this statement is true, I feel it deep….. deep down in my plums. 


He came in as Josh Allen was winning a Super Bowl for the Arizona Cardinals and I said no, let the boy watch.  He needs to learn, the way I learned, from my father..

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
25 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

 

For $120M/season?  

 

I expect a little bit more than from someone that works at Topps making $32k.  

 

But what, Thursday thru Sunday isn't long enough?  

 

But hey, since our defense has earned it ... 

 

 

 

Okay so you did answer my question.  You do want to the Bills to be the ONLY team in the ENTIRE NFL to have shorten bye weeks to practice.  Come to Buffalo, we aren't going to give you full bye weeks while 31 other teams will. 

 

In your mind, 4 days should be enough for them.  Practicing or playing every week since late July when they report to camp.  Not to mention OTA's and weight training/conditioning, training room, film....it's grueling.  Every weekend late July to January (longer if you're in the playoffs) is taken away by football.  And you say it makes "absolutely no sense" for them to have a week off?

 

This sounds like someone who has never done anything physically exerting for long periods of time.  I don't know if you have or haven't but it definitely sounds like you haven't.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, OutOfBubbleGum said:

But was there a clause in the contract? Hernandez no. Miller? Hopefully yes.

It was a newer contract for Hernandez. The bleep hit the fan in year 2 of a 4 year deal..  Mind you they should have known better since even the players were scared of him and didn’t hang out with him.. how did so many bad men play with Tim Tebow?? Lol

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, PatsFanNH said:

The Pats were still on the hook for Hernandez when he got suspended since it was guaranteed.. and that man was the lowest form of human life. 

I think AH is why there are now COC clauses in player contracts. 

  • Like (+1) 2
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...