Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, MJS said:

You just need excellent coverage guys to blitz like that, and the secondary is so banged up.

When you blitz like that you actually don't need to cover as long so it actually masks lesser corners 

 

Hence why McDermott is getting more aggressive on an older and banged up secondary... Dropping seven could make them cover for 5 seconds.... Blitzing 6 gets the ball out in two... That's three less seconds to cover

 

Defensive backs need to trust their technique 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Livinginthepast said:

I wish Rasul Douglas reaction on the TD run by Hurts had been slightly faster like maybe an athlete in his 20s in the NFL and not like some mall cop to a SF shop lifter! Watch his pathetic attempt to stop Hurts!

Was he the one standing in the endzone who tried to sort of punch the ball after watching Hurst run to the goal line?  I thought that was Poyer.

Posted
3 hours ago, MJS said:

Nice breakdown. I wish McDermott did not blitz so many guys all the time. I'm not against blitzing, but it is just so risky blitzing that many. Why not bring just one or two extra?

 

Eh, the big criticism with Frazier is that he NEVER brought extra pressure. A nice balance would be best, and you have to be good at reading the situation obviously. 

 

Something I noticed yesterday was we blitzed a linebacker (I can't remember who) from like 2-3 yards behind the line of scrimmage and he looked SO SLOW I knew there was no chance he could possibly impact the play, let alone get to Hurts in time to disrupt him. And of course, I don't even think he had touched the LOS before the pass was thrown. 

 

The best pressure schemes understand their personnel and how to use them. Don't call a blitz just to call a blitz - make sure the guy you're sending has a realistic chance to do something. Otherwise you're taking him out of coverage for no reason. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
31 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

When you blitz like that you actually don't need to cover as long so it actually masks lesser corners 

 

Hence why McDermott is getting more aggressive on an older and banged up secondary... Dropping seven could make them cover for 5 seconds.... Blitzing 6 gets the ball out in two... That's three less seconds to cover

 

Defensive backs need to trust their technique 

True, to an extent. I just think he blitzes too many at once.

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Bruffalo said:

Because McDermott's whole defensive philosophy seems to break down when he faces a QB who knows what he's doing (or Mac Jones, apparently).

 

😂🤣😂

 

 

Edited by PBF81
Posted

The defense is the same zone every week every down every game. The league figured this guy’s defense out in 2020. Just zero adjustments and every QB that’s willing to take the easy throw will have anything they want on every 3rd down. If we aren’t turning people over, we aren’t stopping them. McDermotts defense is what cost us a Super Bowl and now it’s costing us the playoffs 

  • Eyeroll 2
  • Agree 1
Posted

Not aiding any defense of the Defense, is the fact that they were on the field in regulation for only 24 minutes and 56 plays.  Both well below league averages.  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, Luka said:

Remember Jim Schwartz? He had a hell of defense. Still does to this day. 

Do you remember when his defense also gave up critical touchdowns in terrible spots?

 

And couldn't get stops when it mattered in big games?

 

Yeah that happened with him here too

Posted
4 hours ago, MJS said:

You just need excellent coverage guys to blitz like that, and the secondary is so banged up.

Douglas, Poyer, Hyde, Benford.   Coach has plenty of talent in the secondary

Posted
13 minutes ago, Chaos said:

Douglas, Poyer, Hyde, Benford.   Coach has plenty of talent in the secondary

Poyer and Hyde are not what they used to be. Benford is fine, but he was a 6th round pick for a reason.

Posted
8 minutes ago, MJS said:

Poyer and Hyde are not what they used to be. Benford is fine, but he was a 6th round pick for a reason.

McD failed as a DC this season. His failure is on him. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Livinginthepast said:

I wish Rasul Douglas reaction on the TD run by Hurts had been slightly faster like maybe an athlete in his 20s in the NFL and not like some mall cop to a SF shop lifter! Watch his pathetic attempt to stop Hurts!


He was in position and had enough time to nail him and keep him out of the end zone.  Wimpy attempt.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, BobbyC81 said:


He was in position and had enough time to nail him and keep him out of the end zone.  Wimpy attempt.

 

imo, there was exactly a 0% chance he was keeping Hurts out of the endzone from that position.

His choices were:

1) Take out Hurts' knees in frustration just after he had already crossed the goalline

2) Get close enough to take a hopeless punch at the ball

 

Considering what an awful day he was having, I'm glad Rasul didn't resort to #1.

Posted
14 minutes ago, BobbyC81 said:


He was in position and had enough time to nail him and keep him out of the end zone.  Wimpy attempt.

Yes oddly so. Even if he nailed Hurts at the goal line and made him pay for it and he still got the TD I would be ok with it but he caresses him!

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...