Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, BBFL said:


Interesting list. Waldron is probably the best out of those 3. 

I won’t say they are my top three but each have interesting pedigrees to add to the traditional list. 
 

Waldron is an interesting candidate having turned around geno, and having background with Mcvay and bill b. Seems to have some nifty scheme wrinkles in recaps I see about Seattle. I don’t watch a ton of their games but enough to be curious 

1 minute ago, RoscoeParrish said:


We have won plenty of games solely because of McD’s defense in his tenure. Short term memory. 

Not enough

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, TheFunPolice said:

 

Than Marv Levy?

 

Nobody yet.

 

If McDermott retires today is he a HOF candidate?

 

I think that's an obvious answer. 

 

 


I won’t get into the Marv vs. McD debate.  
 

My point was he is one of the best HC’s this losing franchise has ever had. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, JROC INTEL said:

I’m nervous about hiring a guy with no experience. Not saying it can’t work, but there would most likely be years of growing pains

 

Nervous about what? Not winning against the Cowboys in a couple weeks in a lost season? I dont think anyone is saying to make it a multi-year deal. But might as well make him interim now and see how it goes. McD's already blown the year.

Just now, RoscoeParrish said:


I won’t get into the Marv vs. McD debate.  
 

My point was he is one of the best HC’s this losing franchise has ever had. 

 

Two losers.

Posted
Just now, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Nervous about what? Not winning against the Cowboys in a couple weeks in a lost season? I dont think anyone is saying to make it a multi-year deal. But might as well make him interim now and see how it goes. McD's already blown the year.

Ok you’ve convinced me. I’m saying he could win out this year and still doom us next year bc he see’s situations he hasn’t before through lack of experience as a HC.  

Posted
6 minutes ago, JROC INTEL said:

I get that, and you may be right. But how is he to compete with weathered veterans like andy reid. Don’t we want someone with a little more experience?

Don’t care. I want a guy that is aggressive and attacks. I want someone that puts the ball in Josh Allen’s hands and gets out of the way. McDermott is a loser and the stats all support it.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Nervous about what? Not winning against the Cowboys in a couple weeks in a lost season? I dont think anyone is saying to make it a multi-year deal. But might as well make him interim now and see how it goes. McD's already blown the year.

 

Two losers.


4th most wins in the NFL since he took over.  That ain’t a loser. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

Yeah these are the no brainer options for sure. I like Brady, he's been better than Dorsey in his short audition, but he isn't an innovator like the guys you mentioned. I'll lose no sleep moving on from him in exchange for an offensive head coach.

 

Recent teams that went from floundering to becoming Super Bowl caliber all followed the same formula - hire an up and coming offensive wunderkind and figure out the rest. Rams, 49ers, Dolphins, Eagles. That was their formula. Best part is we already have the QB so the rest is easy.

 

Unfortunately I think Beane has to go too. Let the new head coach choose someone that will find him next level offensive players to put around the elite QB. I like Beane overall, he represents the franchise well. But too many strikeouts in free agency and he failed to build around Allen. Whether he's more responsible or McDermott is I think you just need to start fresh from top to bottom.


brady got a bit tarnished in his last stop but not long ago he was very much in the list of innovative young guys. 
 

he’s not top of the list but he’s worth discussion probably. That he’s in house already might be his biggest knock if trying to turn the page cleanly but I’d have to wrestle with that a bit

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, RoscoeParrish said:


Or he’s the reason we won last week and were even in the game today for taking a stance and firing our franchise QBs buddy and OC.  

Lol, you’re comparing him to guys that had Jeff Tuel, Brian Brohm and Trent Edwards at QB. McDermott STINKS. He must go. 

McDermott:
Overall record: 68-41 or 62.4%
One score games: 28-26 or 51.2%
In overtime games: 1-6 or 14.3% and he hasn't won one since 2017. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

McDermott and Beane have to go (they won’t). This regime is shot. There’s a soft underbelly in both the approach and roster construction. They’ll always be good enough to not get blown out in the big games.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:


it’s just exhausting to be on the coaching carousel, and all of us have been through it so many times.


I’ve got news: even more exhausting is having the wrong coach waste years.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted (edited)

Winners know how to close out games when your superstar QB leaves the field for the final time with the lead.

 

I don't care how many Ints Josh throws or how many fumbles he loses or how many over throws he tosses. If he leaves the field with the lead, he's the reason you're winning. If there's less than 2 minutes left you better get him the W if you're this so called defensive guru.

 

So sick of watching these teams, most of them bad to mediocre just chip away at his prevent bend and break defensive schemes for the winning scores. 

 

Good coaches put their players in position to win, not play not to lose.

Edited by billsbackto81
  • Like (+1) 4
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Lol, you’re comparing him to guys that had Jeff Tuel, Brian Brohm and Trent Edwards at QB. McDermott STINKS. He must go. 

McDermott:
Overall record: 68-41 or 62.4%
One score games: 28-26 or 51.2%
In overtime games: 1-6 or 14.3% and he hasn't won one since 2017. 

 


I don’t disagree this team needs to be better in close/OT games.  I just don’t think firing the HC is the answer. 

Edited by RoscoeParrish
Posted (edited)

 

7 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Nervous about what? Not winning against the Cowboys in a couple weeks in a lost season? I dont think anyone is saying to make it a multi-year deal. But might as well make him interim now and see how it goes. McD's already blown the year.

 

Two losers.

Why am I a loser for wanting someone with experience like a jim Harb over a guy who had been our oc for two games? 

Edited by JROC INTEL
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...