Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 11/25/2023 at 10:43 PM, Charles Romes said:

I like it in the sense that Brady is taking command and giving the O a definite plan.  He wanted Ty in there last week and we saw why. Tomorrow we will see why Isabella got the nod. 

Expand  

I could definitely see it going either way, hoping for more consistency with Brady and it could be interesting if he does have a plan to get Isabella involved, I'm hopeful on the former not going to hold my breath on the latter, sometimes even if there was a plan it doesn't work out.

Posted

If Isabella actually plays tomorrow, it makes me think they're lacking trust in harty. I hope he does play, let's get some fresh blood out there. 

 

As far as fornette, Imo he is an insurance policy if Murray or cook gets injured 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 5
Posted
  On 11/25/2023 at 11:00 PM, BBFL said:

Ok. Preseason isn’t that much to go by but Ingram always caught my attention. Certainly more good than bad. 

Expand  

I thought the same. Let's see if he gets in and has the speed to keep up with the 1's

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
  On 11/25/2023 at 10:14 PM, JohnNord said:

Last time Isabella was called up everyone assumed he’d be involved and I think he ended up playing special teams.  With Dane Jackson out, I could see the same scenario play out.  
 

Then again we have a new OC who showed a willingness utilize different players in the offense.   It’s not impossible to think he could be in on a few plays like Johnson last week.  

I think Ty Johnson is keeping him on the PS.  He plays special teams and also has shown an ability to pitch in on offense 

Expand  

This first part

  On 11/25/2023 at 10:43 PM, Charles Romes said:

I like it in the sense that Brady is taking command and giving the O a definite plan.  He wanted Ty in there last week and we saw why. Tomorrow we will see why Isabella got the nod. 

Expand  

See above.

 

He's in for special teams. Now, I'm sure he may get 1 or 2 snaps on Offense while he's called up to see what he has but he's there for ST. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
  On 11/25/2023 at 10:01 PM, DuckyBoys said:

looks like lot or 4 wr and Kincaid tomorrow  I wouldnt expect they need Fournette when the run game will probably be Josh scrambles plus a few random rb runs  Spread the eagles out and attack the secondary

Expand  

Totally agree.  Attack their secondary with 11 personnel.  Spread everyone out and be willing to hit Cook out of the backfield.  Let JA17 run when he feels the need.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
  On 11/25/2023 at 11:55 PM, BuffaninSarasota said:

Per Joe B, Isabella up likely as a special team’s replacement for Rapp, who played a large role on ST

Expand  


Screw that, we don’t need Isabella out there on offense.

 

You want to see this offense hum? Put more Gilliam out there.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 11/25/2023 at 10:18 PM, billsbackto81 said:

Looks like Big Game Gabe is now Big Blocking Gabe.

Expand  

 

 Don't really even care what any players role and contribution is...... provided that the end result is  win I can care less if the only player that scores is  player x or player y.  If Gabe only blocks but it helps the team score that's fine by me and I daresay the players.  Any players that don't feel that way  are the players I want purged from the team going forward.  

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
  On 11/25/2023 at 11:55 PM, BuffaninSarasota said:

Per Joe B, Isabella up likely as a special team’s replacement for Rapp, who played a large role on ST

Expand  

 

Hmmm... could be but it's odd to me that they would want a 5'9" wide receiver to take the snaps for Taylor Rapp.

 

It seems more likely to me that Ja'Marcus Ingram (6'2" 190 lbs) would take Rapp's snaps.

 

We shall see.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 11/25/2023 at 11:57 PM, boyst said:

This first part

See above.

 

He's in for special teams. Now, I'm sure he may get 1 or 2 snaps on Offense while he's called up to see what he has but he's there for ST. 

Expand  

I think Isabela probably is up to cover kicks.  Ingram obviously is up for Jackson.  I wondered if Hamlin would just step in for Rapp, and Isabella might see some offensive snaps.  But maybe Isabella simply is up given the possibility that Lewis has to play more defensive snaps with Hyde and Johnson hurting. 

Posted
  On 11/26/2023 at 12:24 AM, Sierra Foothills said:

 

Hmmm... could be but it's odd to me that they would want a 5'9" wide receiver to take the snaps for Taylor Rapp.

 

It seems more likely to me that Ja'Marcus Ingram (6'2" 190 lbs) would take Rapp's snaps.

 

We shall see.

Expand  

The way to address part of that issue is to not kick off very much and to ask Bass to kick it out of the end zone when we do have to kick off. 

  On 11/26/2023 at 1:27 AM, SoCal Deek said:

Him and Sherfield are neck and neck for that award. 

Expand  

Sherfield hasn’t really had (or, I suppose, earned) a chance on the offensive side if the ball.  The Hardy signing looks incomprehensible. 

Posted
  On 11/26/2023 at 1:28 AM, SectionC3 said:

Sherfield hasn’t really had (or, I suppose, earned) a chance on the offensive side if the ball.  The Hardy signing looks incomprehensible. 

Expand  

Both have been nothing more than afterthoughts. They could’ve used the money on better snacks in the team commissary. 😉

Posted
  On 11/25/2023 at 10:55 PM, Process said:

At some point they need to phase out Harty completely on offense and give Isabella a shot at that role. 

 

Right now every single play that goes to Harty is a wasted down. 

Expand  

Agreed.  
 

I already ate my crow on Harty week 4.  I threw in the towel.  He’s doesn’t have the speed he used to have.  The juice isn’t loose.  It’s gone. 
 

Isabella on offense over Harty  👍🏻 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...