Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 2/8/2024 at 12:50 AM, Doc said:

 

Like that border "deal"? :lol:

Expand  

They had a deal until someone nixed it.  They worked on it for months, then DT wasted all that time/money, because he's going to fix it in his first week as president(inmate), just like he did last time when he had Congress.  LOL

Posted
  On 2/8/2024 at 12:53 AM, daz28 said:

They had a deal until someone nixed it.  They worked on it for months, then DT wasted all that time/money, because he's going to fix it in his first week as president(inmate), just like he did last time when he had Congress.  LOL

Expand  

 

How many illegals came into the country under Trump compared to now?

Posted
  On 2/8/2024 at 1:00 AM, Doc said:

 

How many illegals came into the country under Trump compared to now?

Expand  

A lot, but he was doing a better job of deporting.  I'm not a Biden shill I deal in facts, but it's also a fact that there's simply more people coming and Biden is actually apprehending millions.  This bill is no dumber than Trumps wall, and costs about the same, without all the environmental damage.  Not to mention it would have taken years to erect.  This will take months to put in effect, but just call it a "DISASTER", while playing political theater.  

Posted
  On 2/8/2024 at 1:12 AM, daz28 said:

A lot, but he was doing a better job of deporting.  I'm not a Biden shill I deal in facts, but it's also a fact that there's simply more people coming and Biden is actually apprehending millions.  This bill is no dumber than Trumps wall, and costs about the same, without all the environmental damage.  Not to mention it would have taken years to erect.  This will take months to put in effect, but just call it a "DISASTER", while playing political theater.  

Expand  

Why are there more coming over than ever before? Hint: current admin policy.

Posted
  On 2/8/2024 at 1:17 AM, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Why are there more coming over than ever before? Hint: current admin policy.

Expand  

That's certainly a factor, but I don't believe the voter farming BS.  We also can't be sure that crossing wouldn't have been going up if not for Covid, and having title 42 helped.  Biden is weak on deporting, though for sure.  That's why I love this bill.  It makes action mandatory. 

Posted
  On 2/8/2024 at 1:24 AM, daz28 said:

That's certainly a factor, but I don't believe the voter farming BS.  We also can't be sure that crossing wouldn't have been going up if not for Covid, and having title 42 helped.  Biden is weak on deporting, though for sure.  That's why I love this bill.  It makes action mandatory. 

Expand  

Voter farming? Maybe maybe not. But illegals get counted in the census, and that does determine how things are allocated.

Posted
  On 2/8/2024 at 1:27 AM, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Voter farming? Maybe maybe not. But illegals get counted in the census, and that does determine how things are allocated.

Expand  

Then you'd think Texas would be happy to keep them all.  I don't buy that one either, because it's making DEM governors look bad now.  If that was their plan, it was dumb, and backfired hugely.  

Posted
  On 2/8/2024 at 1:29 AM, daz28 said:

Then you'd think Texas would be happy to keep them all.  I don't buy that one either, because it's making DEM governors look bad now.  If that was their plan, it was dumb, and backfired hugely.  

Expand  

Texas doesn't want any of them, that's the point. It seems like alot of these dem sanctuary cities don't want them either.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 2/8/2024 at 1:31 AM, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Texas doesn't want any of them, that's the point. It seems like alot of these dem sanctuary cities don't want them either.

Expand  

 

Yeah, that "stunt" turned out to be both politically and in reality brilliant.

  • BillsFanNC changed the title to Illegal Immigration is Bad For America:"Undocumented Americans" are the people dems care most about.
Posted
  On 2/8/2024 at 7:27 PM, BillsFanNC said:

 

Expand  

They got you right where they want you.  Don't think, just post dumb lies.  If you "encounter' someone in the woods, and escort them off your property, it's NOT the same thing as "letting them in".  You jokers really have a horrible view of what letting someone in means.  When someone breaks down a barrier(or door), it's NOT the same as letting them in.  LOL  

Posted
  On 2/8/2024 at 7:36 PM, daz28 said:

They got you right where they want you.  Don't think, just post dumb lies.  If you "encounter' someone in the woods, and escort them off your property, it's NOT the same thing as "letting them in".  You jokers really have a horrible view of what letting someone in means.  When someone breaks down a barrier(or door), it's NOT the same as letting them in.  LOL  

Expand  

Huh? Who gets escorted off? You must not know how this currently works. They apprehend them and then they get released into the country! They are supposed to appear at a future court date and of course they never do. If they were stopping them and sending them back that would be one thing but they are definitely not doing that. They are even committing crimes here and not getting sent back! This is all insanity 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 2/8/2024 at 7:39 PM, KDIGGZ said:

Huh? Who gets escorted off? You must not know how this currently works. They apprehend them and then they get released into the country! They are supposed to appear at a future court date and of course they never do. If they were stopping them and sending them back that would be one thing but they are definitely not doing that. They are even committing crimes here and not getting sent back! This is all insanity 

Expand  

This is about the bill supposedly "letting 5000 in/day", which is complete nonsense.  It's 5000 ENCOUNTERS.  I'm not talking about apprehensions and what happens after that, just that the 5000 encounters is being intentionally mischaracterized.  As for what you were saying though, yes that is insanity.    

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
  On 2/8/2024 at 7:47 PM, daz28 said:

This is about the bill supposedly "letting 5000 in/day", which is complete nonsense.  It's 5000 ENCOUNTERS.  I'm not talking about apprehensions and what happens after that, just that the 5000 encounters is being intentionally mischaracterized.  As for what you were saying though, yes that is insanity.    

Expand  

How about accurately characterizing 5000 ENCOUNTERS for us?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 2/8/2024 at 7:52 PM, JDHillFan said:

How about accurately characterizing 5000 ENCOUNTERS for us?

Expand  

There were 1.6 million of them last year, so shouldn't be hard to track down someone who can explain it to you.  I've seen the border patrol trucks around the Niagara river, maybe stop one of them and ask them.  

×
×
  • Create New...