Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I see constant complaints around here with regard to the supporting cast. I believe there is plenty of blame to go around here and it should start with Beane. There has been no true effort to try and find a No. 2 receiver since John Brown left. However, Dawson Knox is making an obscene amount of money for a guy who is essentially interchangeable with about 20 other TEs in the league based on what he actually provides. This reeks of a signing that was Allen driven based on their relationship. Star players that want power and a say in personnel decisions should also thus inherit responsibility. Where does everyone fall on this? Those are critical resources that could have been used elsewhere..  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 4
Posted

I would agree that Dorsey as OC, Kyle Allen as backup and resigning of Knox were all partially Josh's preference.  I don't think he had much input on any draft picks though.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
Posted

No, he’s just the QB. Of course he’s going to give his input, why wouldn’t he? I’ve said this a 1,000 times before and I’ll say it again-Beane is also paid millions of dollars a year to make these decisions. Personnel falls on the front office and the coaches. Josh didn’t sit in a meeting with Beane and say “you better pay Dawson $12 million a year or I’m out” 

  • Agree 8
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted

Knox got that contract because he's a versatile player who works hard, at the time looked like he also had more upside to get better and was also the only TE available in a very bare Bills cupboard. That's it. It had nothing to do with Allen, imo.

If Allen has any effect on personnel decisions, it's that the Bills seem to focus more on using resources to beef up their D and less on their offense because they think Allen can just turn a sow's ear into a silk purse.

  • Like (+1) 10
  • Agree 7
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 4
Posted
3 minutes ago, Johnnyp566 said:

I see constant complaints around here with regard to the supporting cast. I believe there is plenty of blame to go around here and it should start with Beane. There has been no true effort to try and find a No. 2 receiver since John Brown left. However, Dawson Knox is making an obscene amount of money for a guy who is essentially interchangeable with about 20 other TEs in the league based on what he actually provides. This reeks of a signing that was Allen driven based on their relationship. Star players that want power and a say in personnel decisions should also thus inherit responsibility. Where does everyone fall on this? Those are critical resources that could have been used elsewhere..  

 

Not sure if Josh insisted on that deal, but I didn't think Knox deserved that kinda deal based on his play.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I doubt it honestly, especially considering how he’s performed with just Diggs as the absolute only consistent option on offense. 
 

Green Bay did little to accommodate Rodgers and look what that did over time… 

 

When you’re able to polish 💩 as a QB I get how there is a reluctance to assign resources on a unit that is performing well. 
 

New England did the same thing… draft pretty much TEs for a QB with some mid-low round WRs. The only difference there is they always invested in actually protecting Tommy by improving OLine play. 
 

Let’s hope they figure at least that part out for Josh before it becomes too little too late. 

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

I'm sure Allen has given his input. It was pretty heavily implied that last year he really wanted Beasley and Brown back. I've also heard that Josh had sent a message to Beane about Kincaid on draft day. And we all know Dorsey was the frontrunner for the OC job...and he happened to be who Josh wanted.

 

I believe there is a delicate balance of hearing his input and then deciding if what he wants is feasible and makes sense. In other words last year he wanted Cole back. At that point it's on Beane to weigh the options out there. If he felt there were better choices he would go that way. All things even, I think Allen's wants may break a tie.

Edited by BuffaloBillyG
  • Agree 1
Posted

Josh may have had input on bringing back Brown and Beasley last season and maybe Gentry to the PS a few years ago but I don't think he has much say in the major decisions.

 

In promoting Dorsey to OC, I'm guessing McBeane asked Josh if he could work with Dorsey and Josh said yes... there's your recommendation.

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

There “would” be blame on say, for instance Allen,  if he was “insisting” that say Knox be signed, or any other player that under performs, but that would come down to Beane/McDermott for buckling, but I doubt that Allen  has that sort of influence.

 

Imo, most if not all of the offensive woes come down to a patchwork quilt for an O-line (since day one), which creates endless negative outcomes, add on the poor use of existing personnel, (and yes we need to get a better #2 WR and make Davis the stud #3 he can totally be). These are the things that negatively effect Allen’s play.  Fix those things and the offense will shine, again jmo. Sure hope Joe Brady has his OC sh-t together and gets it right, right away. 
 

GO BILLS!!!

Edited by Don Otreply
  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
2 hours ago, Simon said:

Knox got that contract because he's a versatile player who works hard, at the time looked like he also had more upside to get better and was also the only TE available in a very bare Bills cupboard. That's it. It had nothing to do with Allen, imo.

If Allen has any effect on personnel decisions, it's that the Bills seem to focus more on using resources to beef up their D and less on their offense because they think Allen can just turn a sow's ear into a silk purse.


Agree with all the reasons for signing Knox to that long term deal. Do you think he would’ve gotten as much in the open market? I think the Bills overpaid and it’s partly because of Allen’s relationship with Knox. 
 

Posted
2 minutes ago, 90sBills said:


Agree with all the reasons for signing Knox to that long term deal. Do you think he would’ve gotten as much in the open market? I think the Bills overpaid and it’s partly because of Allen’s relationship with Knox. 
 

Well said 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Simon said:

 

If Allen has any effect on personnel decisions, it's that the Bills seem to focus more on using resources to beef up their D and less on their offense because they think Allen can just turn a sow's ear into a silk purse.

 

I knew a guy who did that once

Posted
3 hours ago, Johnnyp566 said:

I see constant complaints around here with regard to the supporting cast. I believe there is plenty of blame to go around here and it should start with Beane. There has been no true effort to try and find a No. 2 receiver since John Brown left. However, Dawson Knox is making an obscene amount of money for a guy who is essentially interchangeable with about 20 other TEs in the league based on what he actually provides. This reeks of a signing that was Allen driven based on their relationship. Star players that want power and a say in personnel decisions should also thus inherit responsibility. Where does everyone fall on this? Those are critical resources that could have been used elsewhere..  

no

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Lost said:

I would agree that Dorsey as OC, Kyle Allen as backup and resigning of Knox were all partially Josh's preference.  I don't think he had much input on any draft picks though.


Don’t forget Matt Barkley and Tanner Gentry. 
 

I think the org needs to pull some decision making back from Josh.
 

That said, I have no idea how much say he has over all things Gabe Davis, draft, etc. 

Posted

they overpaid Knox based on their philosophy of drafting/retaining their own.   Josh had zero to do with it  Have to show your draft picks were up to snuff by keeping mediocre players at top 10 starter money

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Johnnyp566 said:

I see constant complaints around here with regard to the supporting cast. I believe there is plenty of blame to go around here and it should start with Beane. There has been no true effort to try and find a No. 2 receiver since John Brown left. However, Dawson Knox is making an obscene amount of money for a guy who is essentially interchangeable with about 20 other TEs in the league based on what he actually provides. This reeks of a signing that was Allen driven based on their relationship. Star players that want power and a say in personnel decisions should also thus inherit responsibility. Where does everyone fall on this? Those are critical resources that could have been used elsewhere..  

 

 

Knox is either 8th or 9th highest paid TE in the league and most of the players behind him pay wise are on contacts expiring this coming off season which likely means by this time next year, Knox may be like the 17th highest paid TE or lower.  With the emergence of Kincaid, he very likely will become the Bills primary blocking TE, but also one of the better blocking TE's who can actually catch passes and run routes in the league so can't just ignore him.  He won't be the next Lee Smith!

 

Did Allen give input sure, but to say they were signed and given big contracts because of Allen is just laughable.  From what's been written, there has been an effort to find a #2 WR, talks with OBJ, Hopkins, and who knows who else.  But they also didn't have the money to spend.  Add into that hope that Davis would develop also factored in so don't want to spend big money on a player when the answer may be with a guy on a rookie contract.

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, 90sBills said:


Agree with all the reasons for signing Knox to that long term deal. Do you think he would’ve gotten as much in the open market? I think the Bills overpaid and it’s partly because of Allen’s relationship with Knox. 
 

 

I suck with salary cap and contract stuff so I have no idea what he might have been worth on the open market when the contract was signed.

Judging by the other extensions/re-signings that Bean has done, there's no real pattern of him wildly overpaying so I'd guess his contract was pretty close to what his market value would have been at the time.

  • Like (+1) 2
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...