daz28 Posted May 23 Posted May 23 6 minutes ago, BillStime said: The cult will never be able to erase the DJT stain. Here's the censorship THEY were so worried about. She wasn't allowed to speak the rest of the day. They'll probably be ecstatic, because it's a dem, and hypocrisy doesn't exist in the bubble.
BillStime Posted May 23 Author Posted May 23 2 minutes ago, daz28 said: Here's the censorship THEY were so worried about. She wasn't allowed to speak the rest of the day. They'll probably be ecstatic, because it's a dem, and hypocrisy doesn't exist in the bubble. Where are the twitter files when you need them? @BillsFanNC? Bueller?
The Frankish Reich Posted May 23 Posted May 23 On 5/20/2024 at 10:59 AM, BillStime said: Only the best... Somehow it failed to dawn on me that this is the famously mentally unstable Royce White, former NBA forward. Good Lord. 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted May 23 Posted May 23 9 hours ago, daz28 said: Here's the censorship THEY were so worried about. She wasn't allowed to speak the rest of the day. They'll probably be ecstatic, because it's a dem, and hypocrisy doesn't exist in the bubble. Censorship? The house and senate hearings/committees are a conglomerate of silliness, pettiness, shutdowns, putdowns, grandstanding, implications, posturing and theater. They live and operate in a world the rest of us do not. Or, as you indicated yesterday—-politicians honest lolol. If the rules were followed, they were followed. If they were not, procedural complaints will surely follow. Stand by though, I may be enraged by something similar happening in the senate in a half hour or so. 1 1
daz28 Posted May 23 Posted May 23 2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Censorship? The house and senate hearings/committees are a conglomerate of silliness, pettiness, shutdowns, putdowns, grandstanding, implications, posturing and theater. They live and operate in a world the rest of us do not. Or, as you indicated yesterday—-politicians honest lolol. If the rules were followed, they were followed. If they were not, procedural complaints will surely follow. Stand by though, I may be enraged by something similar happening in the senate in a half hour or so. Were the rules followed? The procedural complaints will be ignored. Carl said that McGovern had “accused the presumed nominee for the office of president of engaging in illegal activities,” describing the words as “offensive” and stating that a presumptive nominee of a party is subject to the same rules of decorum as those that apply to a sitting president — a bold claim considering how often Republicans themselves accuse President Joe Biden of committing crimes. McGovern’s statement was not a slanderous accusation of criminality, but rather an acknowledgment of the various existing legal proceedings against the former president. Ahead of Carl’s ruling, McGovern raised several points of inquiry before the floor, asking if it was “correct that members can mention the trial, call it a sham, and question the integrity of the judge, but a reference to the mere existence of that same trial without any characterization, that’s out of order?” Carl refused to provide a response. 1
Tommy Callahan Posted May 23 Posted May 23 Dems gotta keep the "hate orange dude energy going hard". Cause they can't stand on the accomplishments of the Dem platform as it's only benefiting the crust and public corps owned by the correct groups.
BillStime Posted May 23 Author Posted May 23 1 minute ago, Tommy Callahan said: Dems gotta keep the "hate orange dude energy going hard". Cause they can't stand on the accomplishments of the Dem platform as it's only benefiting the crust and public corps owned by the correct groups. Every accusation is a confession. Where is the CONALD'S GREATESTE ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF ALL TIME thread?
Tommy Callahan Posted May 23 Posted May 23 Still trying to point at the other party cause they don't have Biden accomplishments.
BillStime Posted May 23 Author Posted May 23 6 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: Still trying to point at the other party cause they don't have Biden accomplishments. JFC, we don't? Are you really this pathetic? (Stupid question - you are beyond pathetic). YOU WISH Trump had these accomplishments: Is Infrastructure still two weeks out? What about the CHIPS acts? Oh, Veterans, you know, those folks you call suckers and losers and the true patriots who fought Nazis in WWII, Biden signed the PACT Act - an expansion of benefits for toxic-exposed veterans to improve their health and lives. Inflation Reduction Act? You know - lowering drugs costs for Americans - caping insulin costs - every single cult member voted against it. Protecting Social Security and Medicare How's TrumpCare? Oh, that's right - doesn't exist. Meanwhile, Biden signed a law to protect ACA. Job Growth = all time high bro! More people working now than ever before... Stock Market = all time high bro! How's NATO looking these days? Stronger than ever. Democracy - Biden is protecting our DEMOCRACY with honesty and integrity.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted May 23 Posted May 23 29 minutes ago, daz28 said: Were the rules followed? The procedural complaints will be ignored. I don’t know if the rules were followed. You don’t know if the rules were followed. What I do know is that you’ve had multiple opportunities to declare the Dems are above reproach. You’ve offered you don’t trust them. We’re in the same boat, really. Now….. If there was a procedure violated, a complaint rendered and then the complaint was ignored, a second complaint should be lodged post haste. We have to have procedures else we have anarchy. 29 minutes ago, daz28 said: Carl said that McGovern had “accused the presumed nominee for the office of president of engaging in illegal activities,” describing the words as “offensive” and stating that a presumptive nominee of a party is subject to the same rules of decorum as those that apply to a sitting president — a bold claim considering how often Republicans themselves accuse President Joe Biden of committing crimes. McGovern’s statement was not a slanderous accusation of criminality, but rather an acknowledgment of the various existing legal proceedings against the former president. Ahead of Carl’s ruling, McGovern raised several points of inquiry before the floor, asking if it was “correct that members can mention the trial, call it a sham, and question the integrity of the judge, but a reference to the mere existence of that same trial without any characterization, that’s out of order?” Carl refused to provide a response. Bold claims are just that, bold. It is likely the millionth time a bold claim was made in the halls of power. I don’t care.
daz28 Posted May 23 Posted May 23 5 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I don’t know if the rules were followed. You don’t know if the rules were followed. What I do know is that you’ve had multiple opportunities to declare the Dems are above reproach. You’ve offered you don’t trust them. We’re in the same boat, really. Now….. If there was a procedure violated, a complaint rendered and then the complaint was ignored, a second complaint should be lodged post haste. We have to have procedures else we have anarchy. Bold claims are just that, bold. It is likely the millionth time a bold claim was made in the halls of power. I don’t care. The rule that took an hour to come up with was, wait for this: House members may not criticize the king. I'm not kidding either. Even though everything stated was factual. As McGovern continued through Trump’s legal woes, Rep. Erin Houchin (R-Ind.) grew impatient. “Take down his words,” she said. “Mr. Speaker, I demand that his words be taken down.” “The gentleman from Massachusetts will now be seated,” Carl ordered McGovern. The House then came to an abrupt pause as the House parliamentarian, staff and Carl figured out whether McGovern’s words broke any rules that would merit having them struck from the record. Clerks rifled through a transcript of McGovern’s remarks as members of the Rules Committee crowded around the Democratic and Republican work stations. McGovern, meanwhile, leaned back in his chair sporting a large smirk. Across the chamber, Houchin leaned forward in her chair and covered herself with a large white shawl. A little over an hour later, Carl returned to the rostrum. “The chair is prepared to rule,” he said, in a slow Southern drawl. He would be striking down McGovern’s words. The Democrat stared back at him with his hands in the air, then rolled his eyes at the decision. Carl cited the archaic House rule McGovern had referenced earlier that prohibits House members from criticizing the king. Carl argued that, per that rule, House members in the chamber can’t accuse a presidential nominee of engaging in illegal activities — even if that nominee has been legally charged. “This is warranted even though a candidate may not have officially obtained the party’s nomination once there’s no reasonable dispute that the candidate will receive the nomination,” Carl said. The Republican added that while the House rules allow for criticism of a candidate’s official positions, “it is a breach of order to refer to a candidate in terms [that are] personally offensive.” McGovern, thus, was blocked from speaking on the House floor for the rest of the day. 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted May 23 Posted May 23 12 minutes ago, daz28 said: The rule that took an hour to come up with was, wait for this: House members may not criticize the king. I'm not kidding either. Even though everything stated was factual. As McGovern continued through Trump’s legal woes, Rep. Erin Houchin (R-Ind.) grew impatient. “Take down his words,” she said. “Mr. Speaker, I demand that his words be taken down.” “The gentleman from Massachusetts will now be seated,” Carl ordered McGovern. The House then came to an abrupt pause as the House parliamentarian, staff and Carl figured out whether McGovern’s words broke any rules that would merit having them struck from the record. Clerks rifled through a transcript of McGovern’s remarks as members of the Rules Committee crowded around the Democratic and Republican work stations. McGovern, meanwhile, leaned back in his chair sporting a large smirk. Across the chamber, Houchin leaned forward in her chair and covered herself with a large white shawl. A little over an hour later, Carl returned to the rostrum. “The chair is prepared to rule,” he said, in a slow Southern drawl. He would be striking down McGovern’s words. The Democrat stared back at him with his hands in the air, then rolled his eyes at the decision. Carl cited the archaic House rule McGovern had referenced earlier that prohibits House members from criticizing the king. Carl argued that, per that rule, House members in the chamber can’t accuse a presidential nominee of engaging in illegal activities — even if that nominee has been legally charged. “This is warranted even though a candidate may not have officially obtained the party’s nomination once there’s no reasonable dispute that the candidate will receive the nomination,” Carl said. The Republican added that while the House rules allow for criticism of a candidate’s official positions, “it is a breach of order to refer to a candidate in terms [that are] personally offensive.” McGovern, thus, was blocked from speaking on the House floor for the rest of the day. Perhaps, in addition to the complaint, a strongly worded letter to leadership is in order.
The Frankish Reich Posted May 23 Posted May 23 46 minutes ago, BillStime said: JFC, we don't? Are you really this pathetic? (Stupid question - you are beyond pathetic). YOU WISH Trump had these accomplishments: Is Infrastructure still two weeks out? What about the CHIPS acts? Oh, Veterans, you know, those folks you call suckers and losers and the true patriots who fought Nazis in WWII, Biden signed the PACT Act - an expansion of benefits for toxic-exposed veterans to improve their health and lives. Inflation Reduction Act? You know - lowering drugs costs for Americans - caping insulin costs - every single cult member voted against it. Protecting Social Security and Medicare How's TrumpCare? Oh, that's right - doesn't exist. Meanwhile, Biden signed a law to protect ACA. Job Growth = all time high bro! More people working now than ever before... Stock Market = all time high bro! How's NATO looking these days? Stronger than ever. Democracy - Biden is protecting our DEMOCRACY with honesty and integrity.
Recommended Posts