I’d like to see players’ contracts not only have incentives but penalties as well.

[RyanC883]

I think not hitting incentives is a penalty, in a way.    You could structure a K to have an incentive that if you are under X number of interceptions or fumbles, then you get X  dollars.  Although may lead to players playing too tight, not exactly what you want.  

 

 

[Rc2catch]

 

 

[vanislebills44]

every time josh checks it down and doesn't force a throw into tight coverage he should get atleast an attaboy

[DabillsDaBillsDaBills]

Just now, vanislebills44 said:

every time josh checks it down and doesn't force a throw into tight coverage he should get atleast an attaboy

 

McDermott: Best I can do is an angry glare

[Mango]

I am going to have to go back and check your reactions to any of my posts and rethink my position anything you agree with. 

This will never happen. And nor should it. I know I am thinking a million steps down the line here, but if this were to get approved at the level of the NFL, just wait until your employer starts asking for money back if you miss a monthly/quarterly/yearly target. 

This is crazy. 

[JohnBonhamRocks]

I’m on board with this if the penalties are akin to those given to someone for their last place fantasy football league finish.

 

For example, after his 3 fumbles, Cook would have to sell lemonade while wearing a dress in Delaware Park.

[Aussie Joe]

I’d like penalties to apply to some of the dumb threads that get started here ..

 

Start a dumb thread …tax his sorry ass…

 

 

[stuvian]

Demaurice Smith wants to hear from you

[14774]

I think having penalties as a contractual thing would never get approved nor work. BUT...I think incentives should be a more widespread thing. Games played, yards, receptions, sacks, tackles, FG/PATs made, etc.