Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sounds interesting.  One of the guys was appointed by W Bush, a guy libs say is a war criminal who never sniffed the inside of a courtroom (like other notable American  politickers Clinton, Clinton, Spitzer and the like).  The other guy likes to do his personal laundry in the public eye, and his family seems to be a mess. 
 

Not for me. 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Sounds interesting.  One of the guys was appointed by W Bush, a guy libs say is a war criminal who never sniffed the inside of a courtroom (like other notable American  politickers Clinton, Clinton, Spitzer and the like).  The other guy likes to do his personal laundry in the public eye, and his family seems to be a mess. 
 

Not for me. 

 

 

 

They probably wouldn't want you 

Posted

Righties here will mock it because it's not maga enough.   They will be called rinos even if that makes zero sense.

 

Sounds like real conservatives attacking Trump.  Time will tell if it's legit.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted (edited)

lol, yeah. George Conway is a real conservative.

 

anything to get the Right to fall in love with the Bush era GOP.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Tommy Callahan
Posted
40 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

They probably wouldn't want you 

That's ok.  I'm not 7, and understand that I won't get invited to everyone's birthday party.  It's liberating. 

 

 

11 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

👆

👇

 

Neither is the rule of law!

 

Which rule of law are you referencing?  Be specific, this is your mic drop moment. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

Righties here will mock it because it's not maga enough.   They will be called rinos even if that makes zero sense.

 

Sounds like real conservatives attacking Trump.  Time will tell if it's legit.

Or, perhaps it's better to think of this group as a franchise.    See, some folks like your McDonald's because they like a Quarter Pounder with Cheese and the crispy french fries.   Some might like Burger King, preferring the Classic Chicken sandwich and Onion rings.   Still others might think Wendy's for a Frosty, or maybe Popeye's chicken niblets suits a particular fancy.  In fact, there are people who prefer the anit-biotic-free chicken of a Chipolte (they swaddle in comfort and love before the slaughter).  

 

Or, put another way...does every political group aligned with your party preference ring your bell with regularity?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Or, perhaps it's better to think of this group as a franchise.    See, some folks like your McDonald's because they like a Quarter Pounder with Cheese and the crispy french fries.   Some might like Burger King, preferring the Classic Chicken sandwich and Onion rings.   Still others might think Wendy's for a Frosty, or maybe Popeye's chicken niblets suits a particular fancy.  In fact, there are people who prefer the anit-biotic-free chicken of a Chipolte (they swaddle in comfort and love before the slaughter).  

 

Or, put another way...does every political group aligned with your party preference ring your bell with regularity?

 

 

When I said time will tell you took that as they ring my bell?  Huh.  That's unusual.   Plus, and this may be foreign to as closed a mind as yours, I can respect one aspect of a group or ideology while despising the rest.   Not that I despise the constitution, but their interpretations.

 

But by all means, keep blasting away at any negativity toward the orangutan king.  I know anything even hinting at negativity toward him is worthy only of derision from the not cult right.

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

They always go back to the orange dude. always.  while trying to call other insults.

 

its a strange obsession.

 

reminds me of the quote. 

 

Any person capable of angering you, is your master.

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

When I said time will tell you took that as they ring my bell?  Huh.  That's unusual.   Plus, and this may be foreign to as closed a mind as yours, I can respect one aspect of a group or ideology while despising the rest.   Not that I despise the constitution, but their interpretations.

 

But by all means, keep blasting away at any negativity toward the orangutan king.  I know anything even hinting at negativity toward him is worthy only of derision from the not cult right.

Thank you for the opportunity to clarify.  What made me think you had tunnel vision was when you said "righties here will mock it because it's not maga enough".  Off the top of my head, I have encountered 3 or 4 different versions of conservatism from people who clearly identify as 'rightie" out of the handful that post here.   From my perspective only, I wouldn't identify as "maga", didn't call the new group "rhinos" and indicated the plan was "interesting enough".  

 

I don't understand the jump from my post to you ruminating about not despising the constitution, I can't see where my post implied or suggested that. 

 

If you're upset because you're a  Chik fil-A or Arby's guy and I left them out of my franchise analogy, I want you to know I just ran out of time.

 

Btw...remember the lessons of the original  L. Ron, don't take yourself so seriously. 

 

 

 

 

  • Sad 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

That's ok.  I'm not 7, and understand that I won't get invited to everyone's birthday party.  It's liberating. 

 

 

Which rule of law are you referencing?  Be specific, this is your mic drop moment. 

 

I don't need to emphasize any laws. There's ample evidence here of you defending every aspect of this POS:

 

image.thumb.jpeg.1fdbe85a7d335fa55860c0d21ab88b52.jpeg

 

 

Posted (edited)
57 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Thank you for the opportunity to clarify.  What made me think you had tunnel vision was when you said "righties here will mock it because it's not maga enough".  Off the top of my head, I have encountered 3 or 4 different versions of conservatism from people who clearly identify as 'rightie" out of the handful that post here.   From my perspective only, I wouldn't identify as "maga", didn't call the new group "rhinos" and indicated the plan was "interesting enough".  

 

I don't understand the jump from my post to you ruminating about not despising the constitution, I can't see where my post implied or suggested that. 

 

If you're upset because you're a  Chik fil-A or Arby's guy and I left them out of my franchise analogy, I want you to know I just ran out of time.

 

Btw...remember the lessons of the original  L. Ron, don't take yourself so seriously. 

 

 

 

 

So this doesn't exactly translate very well, so you're saying this flavor of conservative doesn't suit you? but neither does the extreme right MAGA? But is there one that is standing up and not just letting the extreme right of the party lead the whole thing around that does? Or are you just okay with that which would essentially mean your okay with the extreme right being in charge of the party anyway?

Edited by Warcodered
Posted
33 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

I don't need to emphasize any laws. There's ample evidence here of you defending every aspect of this POS:

 

image.thumb.jpeg.1fdbe85a7d335fa55860c0d21ab88b52.jpeg

 

 

No one said you had to do anything, BillSy.   You offered a comment, and I asked you to clarify.  I knew you wouldn't, but asked anyways.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...