BillsFanNC Posted November 8, 2023 Posted November 8, 2023 Impeding an official proceeding caught on video. Straight to the DC gulag? right. 1
JaCrispy Posted November 8, 2023 Posted November 8, 2023 2 standards of justice means there is no justice… 1 3
Warcodered Posted November 8, 2023 Posted November 8, 2023 26 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Impeding an official proceeding caught on video. Straight to the DC gulag? right. Hmmm then maybe they shouldn't have let spectators into a proceeding that they know has a bunch of people protesting. 🤷♂️ Totally see the similarities though I mean other than being allowed to be there at the start and just sitting until they started yelling their message, and only yelling their message while then peacefully following police instructions and following them out. But you know besides that exactly the same thing. 1
Tiberius Posted November 8, 2023 Posted November 8, 2023 Apples are not all that different from oranges, are they?
Tommy Callahan Posted November 8, 2023 Posted November 8, 2023 34 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Impeding an official proceeding caught on video. Straight to the DC gulag? right. I believe those are the rules they made. Gotta live by them now. 1
JaCrispy Posted November 8, 2023 Posted November 8, 2023 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Apples are not all that different from oranges, are they? A spade is a spade…it doesn’t say you can’t interrupt proceedings only on certain days…let’s keep it real…👍 1
Tiberius Posted November 8, 2023 Posted November 8, 2023 Just now, JaCrispy said: A spade is a spade…it doesn’t say you can’t interrupt proceedings only on certain days…let’s keep it real…👍 Man Slaughter is not premeditated murder Degrees, shades of grey, outright difference... I mean, it don't fit
Tommy Callahan Posted November 8, 2023 Posted November 8, 2023 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Man Slaughter is not premeditated murder still crimes under the criminal code that will result in consequences. but that law is worded so badly, any attempt fits it. Edited November 8, 2023 by Tommy Callahan 1
JaCrispy Posted November 8, 2023 Posted November 8, 2023 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Man Slaughter is not premeditated murder Degrees, shades of grey, outright difference... I mean, it don't fit Correct…but the law they used to prosecute J6 protesters does not differentiate…You can feel however you want, but the law must be followed, and equally applied to all…👍 1 1
Wacka Posted November 8, 2023 Posted November 8, 2023 Lock em up for 3 years! Peacefully protesting and obeying instructions of the cops were what the vast majority of the J6 prisoners were doing. 2
BillStime Posted November 8, 2023 Posted November 8, 2023 Karen Psyop should have leveraged this thread for this garbage:
BillsFanNC Posted February 5 Author Posted February 5 At the same time Sen Lankford wants to give DC federal judges control over our immigration system, the courthouse is bracing for a major sh*tshow--in fact, it already is--if SCOTUS reverses an appellate court decision on DOJ's application of 1512c2, obstruction of an official proceeding. Every judge except one (Nichols) refused to dismiss the post-Enron law DOJ slapped against 320+ J6ers and Donald Trump. But since SCOTUS granted cert in December, some judges have released a few from prison, delayed sentencing and trials for others, and urged DOJ to seek plea deals on other counts. (This is Judge Beryl Howell, former chief judge, during a hearing a few days after SCOTUS took the case.) It is impossible to overstate just what a black eye this will be for the entire DC district court, the DC US attorney's office, and the entire DOJ if SCOTUS overturns how DOJ used the statute. These are the same judges Lankford and others want to empower in deciding the "constitutionality" of his alleged immigration bill. 2
Recommended Posts