Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm actually hoping Rodgers comes back and does well this season just for the story it would be.

 

I like the guy since he turned heel, as long as it doesn't cost us. 

 

If we can't beat out the Jets with or without Rodgers then that's on us. 

  • Disagree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, PatsFanNH said:

Or they beat the Raiders (whose O is god awful) and they always play the Bills hard so they could be 6-4 and in second place in the division.. (at worst they be 5-5 I can’t see the raiders beating that D)

 

Crosby will probably be a big problem for their OL and that could lead to turnovers which could give the Raiders a short field. The Jets offense is crap.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, Gregg said:

 

Crosby will probably be a big problem for their OL and that could lead to turnovers which could give the Raiders a short field. The Jets offense is crap.

Both O’s are.. I just think the Jets D is better than the Raiders D. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, MJS said:

Look at it from a global standpoint? What does that mean?

Why does it matter if he would have hard feelings or not?

It means this team isn't winning anything with Trevor Simien or Zach Wilson under center but they already know who Simien is.  Developing Wilson in hopes he figures it out is more meaningful than winning one more game with Simien.  Likely this is the position that was dictated to Saleh from ownership.

Posted
3 hours ago, FrenchConnection said:

It's that the HC of an NFL team couldn't get "Zach gives us the best chance to win" out of his mouth. I'm not laughing at the Jets. I'm laughing at Salah's inability to not create national news. This was a front-page story on both ESPN and SI.com.

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Gregg said:

 

A 40-year-old coming back from a torn Achillies in less than 4 months. I can't see it happening. If he does by some miracle come back, there is an excellent chance he will hurt it again. They lose to the Raiders this Sunday night to go 4-5 and then lose at Buffalo to go 4-6 what would be the point of him coming back in a losing year.


he will be cured after spending 3 days here…of course, after the equinox so it will be in darkness.

 

2322930.jpg

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, frostbitmic said:

Why would he put Siemian in vs the Bills ?... Zack Wilson is 2-0 vs the Bills.

 

Wilson has never beaten the Bills in Buffalo. I don't think that changes this year.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Gregg said:

 

A 40-year-old coming back from a torn Achillies in less than 4 months. I can't see it happening. If he does by some miracle come back, there is an excellent chance he will hurt it again. They lose to the Raiders this Sunday night to go 4-5 and then lose at Buffalo to go 4-6 what would be the point of him coming back in a losing year.

I doubt they lose to the Raiders, FWIW.

Edited by vincec
Posted

There’s a chance, small as it may be, that Nathaniel Hackett is the issue. You must remember how awful he was, right? You

must not forget. He is an AWFUL coach. AWFUL. Zach isn’t well liked, he’s not respected, but he does have some talent. Hackett couldn’t get talent out of his own hands if he was holding it, let alone Zach Wilson. 
 

I hate that I typed any of this. 

Posted
6 hours ago, TheFunPolice said:

reason: Rodgers loves Zach and Rodgers is Zach's idol. 

 

No matter what, if/when Rodgers is ready to come back Zach would 100% step aside without any hard feelings because he's one of Aaron's biggest fans. 

 

Even if the Jets were 10-3 under Wilson that's his hero and he would look at it as having done his part to keep the team alive for Rodgers return. 

 

A week ago, Rodgers said he wasn't even jogging yet.  Why on earth would he come back (in what...week 13? 15?) for a lost season?

 

 

Makes no sense

4 hours ago, FrenchConnection said:

He's not even a lovable meathead like Dan Campbell.

 

 

Campbell's a legit coach.  COTY material.

 

Saleh is that guy at Planet Fitness....

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Ballhawk said:

I give Saleh a lot of credit for the coaching job he's done to get this team to 5-4, but anyone thinking they can make the playoffs and make a run has not been following the the offensive brand of football in the NFL for the past 10 years. 

 

I don't know. At least in that game the Jets looked like a poorly coached team.  All the penalties. Guys don't even know where to line up. Tons of false starts. Even given their QB situation, they looked like a train wreck.

Posted
4 hours ago, TheFunPolice said:

 

Oh, I'm not saying it's smart or that I agree with it. But IMO it's 100% because Rodgers backs Zach and is giving the strong impression that he'll be back soon. Those in charge (maybe the owner or GM) are making sure this happens unless it becomes untenable. 

 

Rodgers has gone out of his way to defend Zach on his weekly MacAfee appearances.

 

The team is doing everything it can to please Aaron.

 

 

Talk about allowing an inmate to run the asylum:  the Jests hired Rodgers' buddy, Hackett, to run the offense and Cobb and Lazard to play WR.   Of course they'll keep Aaron's fanboy.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Rubes said:

Can't wait to see Siemian step in and light up our defense.

 

 

It would be the end of this Bills team and would be the end of the season if that happened and we lost.... unrecoverable. WE MUST BEAT THE JETS. PERIOD.

Posted
8 hours ago, Gregg said:

 

A 40-year-old coming back from a torn Achillies in less than 4 months. I can't see it happening. If he does by some miracle come back, there is an excellent chance he will hurt it again. They lose to the Raiders this Sunday night to go 4-5 and then lose at Buffalo to go 4-6 what would be the point of him coming back in a losing year.

 

So I tore mine and recall the doc saying the thread they use to sew it back together is stronger than the actual tendon so not likely he tears the same one.  But could tear the other one or pull hamstring or something else, much better chance of something like that happening.  After my first one I kind of gave up on weekend sports as didn't want to risk tearing the other one and going through all that again.  And I was younger than Rodgers even! LOL

Posted
13 hours ago, vincec said:

I doubt they lose to the Raiders, FWIW.

 

They should have lost the Giants game. If KT doesn't jump offside on the play where Zach completed a pass to midfield then they run out of time and lose. You see how bad the Giants are. I wouldn't be shocked who wins this game. Neither team is good.

  • Agree 2
Posted (edited)

wfan absolutely trashed the Bills today. Evan and Tiki show. I gotta find the clip but they trashed Allen , Evan said they should trade him lmao.. 

Otherwise it has been glorious listening,  they all guaranteed a Jest victory.  

P.S- can't stand the kay show, him ,Don and Rosenturd are brutal but props to him for asking that question 

10 hours ago, Success said:

We really have to win the next 2.  I can out-excuse anyone here, but there are no excuses if we're not 7-4 before that Philly game.

 

Facts.

Absolutely must wins. And Idk the last time I said that

And a Philly L wouldn't kill us. Still feel we'd win though. Go into the bye 7-5 or 8-4 

Edited by JerseyBills
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...