Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

Yup, old Hitler was all into ensuring fair elections 👏

What's fair about Billionaire funded PACS suing to keep the one polling the highest, off the ticket?  and how is that democracy?

 

 

 

 

  • Vomit 1
Posted

Nazis murdered gays 

Nazis were against abortion and birth control 

Nazis smashed unions 

Nazis were real racist 

Book burning? Yup, Nazis 

Stealing elections like 1/6--Nazis yup 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Nazis murdered gays 

Nazis were against abortion and birth control 

Nazis smashed unions 

Nazis were real racist 

Book burning? Yup, Nazis 

Stealing elections like 1/6--Nazis yup 

 

So are the HAMAS/Sharia law the left is openly supporting now.

 

 

you just need a Reichstag fire fire, as the election isnt looking good for the ACT blue/priorities tools

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said:

What's fair about Billionaire funded PACS suing to keep the one polling the highest, off the ticket?  and how is that democracy?

 

 

 

 

might be because he's a crook who is not to be trusted by billionaires or anyone...but esp billionaires.  victimhood is not a successful strategy dude.  self identifying victims don't do well.  Find a new Messiah.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
  • Vomit 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

might be because he's a crook who is not to be trusted by billionaires or anyone...but esp billionaires.  victimhood is not a successful strategy dude.  self identifying victims don't do well.  Find a new Messiah.

nice way of saying billionaires influencing the election. Not democracy.

 

but then again, you guys have proven democracy is just a talking point.

 

 

 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

might be because he's a crook who is not to be trusted by billionaires or anyone...but esp billionaires.  victimhood is not a successful strategy dude.  self identifying victims don't do well.  Find a new Messiah.

We currently have a President that's a crook so the distinction is not necessarily a reason for exclusion from the ballot.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

We currently have a President that's a crook so the distinction is not necessarily a reason for exclusion from the ballot.

Just imagine if Some Billionaire funded Right leaning PAC was suing in swing states to keep Biden off the ticket.

 

There would be no reasonable explanation allowed.  It would be wall to wall TV coverage about righty billionaires trying to influence the election and attacking

democracy.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

We currently have a President that's a crook so the distinction is not necessarily a reason for exclusion from the ballot.

and what crime has he committed?  but thanks for recognizing trump as as a criminal.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

and what crime has he committed?  but thanks for recognizing trump as as a criminal.

His son owed a laptop! 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
21 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said:

So are the HAMAS/Sharia law the left is openly supporting now.

 

 

you just need a Reichstag fire fire, as the election isnt looking good for the ACT blue/priorities tools

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yup.

 

Queers for Palestine.  Talk about dummies but it fits their new buzz word.  "Colonization", or some derivative of the word. 

 

Saw some parodies on this.  Like

 

Blacks for the KKK

Uighurs for the CCP

Turkeys for Thanksgiving

Deer for Hunters

 

  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

sarcasm I hope

 

Nazis killed thousands of pregnant Jews and their babies.  Forced sterilization was also performed.

 

https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306593

For once I'm interested in your response to this @Tommy Callahan.  explain and please don't hide behind an emoji.  talk about pu$$ies.

 

hmmmm, Tommy, Do you feel the holocaust never happened?

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Although the practice is usually associated with Nazi Germany, North Korea, and other oppressive regimes, it was the U.S. that first introduced forced sterilization laws. They were written in accordance with eugenic culture during the Antebellum Period. Here's a timeline of some of the more notable events since 1849

 

https://www.thoughtco.com/forced-sterilization-in-united-states-721308#:~:text=Although the practice is usually associated with Nazi,some of the more notable events since 1849.

 

Gordon Lincecum, a famed Texas biologist and physician, proposed a bill mandating the eugenic sterilization of the mentally handicapped and others whose genes he deemed undesirable. Although the legislation was never sponsored or brought up for a vote, it represented the first serious attempt in U.S. history to use forced sterilization for eugenic purposes.

 

The Nixon administration dramatically increased Medicaid-funded sterilization of low-income Americans, primarily those of color. While these sterilizations were voluntary as a matter of policy, anecdotal evidence later suggested that they were often involuntary as a matter of practice. Patients were frequently misinformed or left uninformed regarding the nature of the procedures that they'd agreed to undergo.

 

Opinion | The Nazis’ First Victims Were the Disabled - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

 

Yes. the Nazis state killing started with the undesirables like disabled and what not.  

 

in Nazi Germany, transgender people had a variety of experiences depending on whether they were considered "Aryan" or capable of useful work.[1] According to the Museum of Jewish Heritage, the Nazi German government "brutally targeted the trans community, deporting many trans people to concentration camps and wiping out vibrant community structures."[2]

Some male-to-female transvestites were targeted under Paragraph 175 as part of the persecution of homosexuals in Nazi Germany; Germany's transvestite community had a recognized subcategory (referred to by Magnus Hirschfeld as early as the 1920s as "total transvestites" or "extreme transvestites") that would later be recognized more widely in medical literature as transsexual.[3][4]

Historian Laurie Marhoefer argues that transgender people were a discrete target of Nazi persecution, citing instances of charges for violating Paragraph 183, a law against cross-dressing.[5] Marhoefer also notes that the Nazis shut down several magazines published by transgender people, shut down the Eldorado Berlin nightclubs that some transgender people worked at, and shut down the Institut für Sexualwissenschaft, a sexology research institute that advocated for transgender rights. Most people who held "transvestite certificates", given to them under the Weimar Republic, had them revoked or German police refused to recognize them. Despite these actions taken against transgender people by the Nazis, there was "little public discussion of trans people" in Germany.[6]

 

 

Eugenics was international, but US sterilization policies were enacted at the state level and addressed local concerns. Thirty-two states legalized eugenic sterilization between 1907 and 1937, resulting in the sterilization of more than 63,000 individuals.  State sterilization laws varied widely, both in their statutory provisions and in the number of operations performed

The law applied only to people already under court-ordered guardianship as “feebleminded” or “insane,” and surgery was legally voluntary. Still, at least 2,350 people—80 percent of them “feebleminded”—were sterilized. For most, sterilization was the “price of freedom” from the state institution.

 

 

Eugenics like other authoritarian things like banning alcohol were progressive policies at the time.  just saying

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Tommy Callahan
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

eighteen wrongs don't make a right Tommy.  Do you think the Nazis were justified in those crimes?

it's not a vacuum.  like most topics.  and no its not a good thing.  but perspective.

 

Eugenics like other authoritarian things like banning alcohol were progressive policies at the time. 

 

And aligned with the NAZIS of the same time frame.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Tommy Callahan
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Wow, understatement of the millennium....

Noticed you skipped right past the part where what the horrible things the nazis were doing, lined right up with US progressive policies in the same time frame.

 

two birds of the same feather.

 

Specifically, by 1936 when both England and the U.S. genetic scientific communities finally condemned eugenical sterilization, over 60,000 forced sterilizations were already performed in the United States on mostly poor (and often African-American) people confined to mental hospitals.

 

your article talks about 300 people in the same time frame.

 

and just think. the current "Abortion till birth" narrative the left demands, again mostly results in minorities being aborted. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Tommy Callahan
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said:

Just imagine if Some Billionaire funded Right leaning PAC was suing in swing states to keep Biden off the ticket.

 

There would be no reasonable explanation allowed.  It would be wall to wall TV coverage about righty billionaires trying to influence the election and attacking

democracy.

 

 

 

 

The biggest thing the Dems have taken from the Nazi's is the government propaganda machine composed of public/private censorship and monitoring of dissenting ideas and facts.  Suppressing anyone and anything that disagrees with the official story.  What the State is unable to do without violating the Constitution is farmed out to various social media platforms, think tanks, and universities acting as a proxy for the government.  Pretenders expressing concern for threats to democracy posed by the extremists.  Dems playing the part of wolves in sheep's clothing.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
×
×
  • Create New...